linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "fengwei.yin" <fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org,
	k.eugene.e@gmail.com, bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com,
	lking@qti.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wcn36xx: handle rx skb allocation failure to avoid system crash
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 09:12:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <566B7499.4040403@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151211140833.GA22332@localhost>



On 2015/12/11 22:08, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:44:54PM +0800, fengwei.yin wrote:
>>>             /* skip this frame if we can't alloc a new rx buffer */
>>>             if (ret)
>>>                    goto drop;
>> This can't work because we need to initialize the DMA for the old skb again.
>> Which is done in following
>> 	switch (ch->ch_type) {
>> block.
>
> Hmm, good point.  You could still move that out to a function like this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/dxe.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/dxe.c
> index f8dfa05..fd447bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/dxe.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/dxe.c
> @@ -467,6 +467,27 @@ out_err:
>
>   }
>
> +/* or whatever name makes sense... */
> +static void wcn36xx_restart_dma(struct wcn36xx *wcn,
> +				struct wcn36xx_dxe_ch *ch,
> +				struct wcn36xx_dxe_desc *dxe)
> +{
> +	switch (ch->ch_type) {
> +	case WCN36XX_DXE_CH_RX_L:
> +		dxe->ctrl = WCN36XX_DXE_CTRL_RX_L;
> +		wcn36xx_dxe_write_register(wcn, WCN36XX_DXE_ENCH_ADDR,
> +					   WCN36XX_DXE_INT_CH1_MASK);
> +		break;
> +	case WCN36XX_DXE_CH_RX_H:
> +		dxe->ctrl = WCN36XX_DXE_CTRL_RX_H;
> +		wcn36xx_dxe_write_register(wcn, WCN36XX_DXE_ENCH_ADDR,
> +					   WCN36XX_DXE_INT_CH3_MASK);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		wcn36xx_warn("Unknown channel\n");
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static int wcn36xx_rx_handle_packets(struct wcn36xx *wcn,
>   				     struct wcn36xx_dxe_ch *ch)
>   {
> @@ -478,26 +499,18 @@ static int wcn36xx_rx_handle_packets(struct wcn36xx *wcn,
>   	while (!(dxe->ctrl & WCN36XX_DXE_CTRL_VALID_MASK)) {
>   		skb = ctl->skb;
>   		dma_addr = dxe->dst_addr_l;
> -		wcn36xx_dxe_fill_skb(wcn->dev, ctl);
> +		ret = wcn36xx_dxe_fill_skb(wcn->dev, ctl);
>
> -		switch (ch->ch_type) {
> -		case WCN36XX_DXE_CH_RX_L:
> -			dxe->ctrl = WCN36XX_DXE_CTRL_RX_L;
> -			wcn36xx_dxe_write_register(wcn, WCN36XX_DXE_ENCH_ADDR,
> -						   WCN36XX_DXE_INT_CH1_MASK);
> -			break;
> -		case WCN36XX_DXE_CH_RX_H:
> -			dxe->ctrl = WCN36XX_DXE_CTRL_RX_H;
> -			wcn36xx_dxe_write_register(wcn, WCN36XX_DXE_ENCH_ADDR,
> -						   WCN36XX_DXE_INT_CH3_MASK);
> -			break;
> -		default:
> -			wcn36xx_warn("Unknown channel\n");
> -		}
> +		/* skip this frame in OOM condition */
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto drop;
>
>   		dma_unmap_single(wcn->dev, dma_addr, WCN36XX_PKT_SIZE,
>   				 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>   		wcn36xx_rx_skb(wcn, skb);
> +
> +drop:
> +		wcn36xx_restart_dma(wcn, ch, dxe);
>   		ctl = ctl->next;
>   		dxe = ctl->desc;
>   	}
>
>
>
> ...that said, not really sure it's worth it now that the 'goto' is only
> skipping two lines.  So, I would be ok with the original patch too.
>
I don't want to introduce "goto". But I really like your choice to create
wcn36xx_restart_dma. I will keep some original patch to avoid "goto" and
adopt the function wcn36xx_restart_dma. Will send the patch out.

Regards
Yin, Fengwei

      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-12  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-02  5:27 [PATCH] wcn36xx: handle rx skb allocation failure to avoid system crash Fengwei Yin
2015-12-11 13:14 ` fengwei.yin
2015-12-11 13:37   ` Bob Copeland
2015-12-11 13:44     ` fengwei.yin
2015-12-11 14:08       ` Bob Copeland
2015-12-12  1:12         ` fengwei.yin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=566B7499.4040403@linaro.org \
    --to=fengwei.yin@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=k.eugene.e@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lking@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
    --cc=wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).