From: Peter Oh <poh@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>, Peter Oh <poh@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "nbd@openwrt.org" <nbd@openwrt.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: add modparam 'hw_csum' to make HW checksum configurable
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:55:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56732F64.2020508@qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQmOg3gACzk5PAtkyDo1a5WJuCauOXPZKqL+cgVi+n1HCg@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/16/2015 11:29 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 17 December 2015 at 00:50, Peter Oh <poh@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 12/16/2015 01:54 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2015-12-16 22:19, Peter Oh wrote:
> [...]
>>>> If mentioned to use the function to mesh frame only without touching
>>>> mac80211, then how do you suggest it to apply it only to mesh frame
>>>> without interfere other data frames?
>>>> Can you share your example?
>>> It's trivial - in ath10k_tx you do this:
>>>
>>> if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT &&
>>> skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)
>>> skb_checksum_help(skb);
>> Thank you Felix for the quick response.
>> I agree on your user experience opinion,
>> but what do you think when ath10k has a new chip supporting HW checksum for
>> Mesh?
> You can simply introduce a fw-feature flag saying
> "supports_mesh_csum_offload" later and skip the skb_checksum_help() if
> it's set.
If we rely on fw-feature flag, then we are not able to use HW checksum
at all even for AP/STA interfaces.
>
> Michał
Thanks,
Peter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-16 18:20 [PATCH] ath10k: add modparam 'hw_csum' to make HW checksum configurable Peter Oh
2015-12-16 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2015-12-16 20:29 ` Peter Oh
2015-12-16 20:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2015-12-16 20:46 ` Peter Oh
2015-12-16 20:53 ` Felix Fietkau
2015-12-16 21:19 ` Peter Oh
2015-12-16 21:54 ` Felix Fietkau
2015-12-16 23:50 ` Peter Oh
2015-12-16 23:59 ` Felix Fietkau
2015-12-17 22:01 ` Peter Oh
2015-12-17 22:57 ` Felix Fietkau
2015-12-17 23:16 ` Peter Oh
2015-12-17 7:29 ` Michal Kazior
2015-12-17 21:55 ` Peter Oh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56732F64.2020508@qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=poh@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=poh@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).