linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] nl80211: Allow GET_INTERFACE dumps to be filtered
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:38:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57ACA9E9.4020507@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470919643.12075.7.camel@sipsolutions.net>

Hi Johannes,

On 08/11/2016 07:47 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 17:02 -0500, Denis Kenzior wrote:
>>
>> +static int nl80211_dump_interface_parse(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> +				    struct netlink_callback *cb,
>> +				    int *filter_wiphy)
>
> Wrong indentation :)

Sorry :)

Speaking of indentation, can you point me to a doc of the rules I should 
follow?

>
>>   static int nl80211_dump_interface(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
>> netlink_callback *cb)
>>   {
>>   	int wp_idx = 0;
>>   	int if_idx = 0;
>>   	int wp_start = cb->args[0];
>>   	int if_start = cb->args[1];
>> +	int filter_wiphy = cb->args[2];
>>   	struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev;
>>   	struct wireless_dev *wdev;
>>
>> +	if (!wp_start && !if_start && !filter_wiphy) {
>
> This seems incorrect - you're setting
>
>> +		int ret;
>> +
>> +		filter_wiphy = -1;
>> +
>> +		ret = nl80211_dump_interface_parse(skb, cb,
>> &filter_wiphy);
>
> it here, but it can take the value 0, so !filter_wiphy seems wrong?
>

I can confirm that I sanity checked this patch. Both ATTR_WIPHY, 
ATTR_WDEV and wildcard dumps seemed to produce expected results.

I noticed you applied this patch.  Is there a particular scenario where 
it goes wrong or did you convince yourself it is correct?

Regards,
-Denis

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-11 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-03 22:02 [RESEND PATCH] nl80211: Allow GET_INTERFACE dumps to be filtered Denis Kenzior
2016-08-11 12:47 ` Johannes Berg
2016-08-11 16:38   ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2016-08-11 18:03     ` Johannes Berg
2016-08-11 18:20       ` Denis Kenzior
2016-08-11 18:58         ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-08-11 19:05           ` Denis Kenzior
2016-08-11 21:22             ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-08-12  5:58         ` Johannes Berg
2016-08-12 16:24           ` Denis Kenzior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57ACA9E9.4020507@gmail.com \
    --to=denkenz@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).