* ATH10K VLAN firmware issue @ 2015-12-08 14:29 Cedric VONCKEN 2015-12-09 15:33 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Cedric VONCKEN @ 2015-12-08 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath10k, linux-wireless I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with eth0. I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the STA eth0. If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not sent. I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with VLAN tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. Thanks for your help. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2015-12-08 14:29 ATH10K VLAN firmware issue Cedric VONCKEN @ 2015-12-09 15:33 ` Ben Greear 2015-12-09 17:24 ` voncken 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2015-12-09 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cedric VONCKEN, ath10k, linux-wireless This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you in other cases as well? Thanks, Ben On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: > I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). > > My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with > eth0. > I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the > STA eth0. > > If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not > sent. > I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with > VLAN tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). > > I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, > 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from openwrt, > and in all cases I have the same issue. > > Thanks for your help. > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* RE: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2015-12-09 15:33 ` Ben Greear @ 2015-12-09 17:24 ` voncken 2016-11-04 14:13 ` Bruno Antunes 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: voncken @ 2015-12-09 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Ben Greear', ath10k, 'linux-wireless' > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] > Envoyé : mercredi 9 décembre 2015 16:34 > À : Cedric VONCKEN; ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless > Objet : Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue > > This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you in > other cases as well? No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). Thanks Cedric. > > Thanks, > Ben > > On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: > > I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). > > > > My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with eth0. > > I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the STA > > eth0. > > > > If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not sent. > > I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with VLAN > > tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). > > > > I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, > > 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from > > openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > > linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > -- > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2015-12-09 17:24 ` voncken @ 2016-11-04 14:13 ` Bruno Antunes [not found] ` <27f802e7-79c5-a17f-1883-88e62a6520ef@ezplanet.net> 2016-11-04 21:17 ` Valo, Kalle 0 siblings, 2 replies; 27+ messages in thread From: Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-04 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: voncken Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless, OpenWrt Development List Hi all, Old thread but I think the issue is still present. I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP and Sta, and with no security. I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. Although it works the throughput is very bad. Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. Best Regards, Bruno On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> wrote: > > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] >> Envoy=C3=A9 : mercredi 9 d=C3=A9cembre 2015 16:34 >> =C3=80 : Cedric VONCKEN; ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless >> Objet : Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >> >> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you in >> other cases as well? > > No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). > > Thanks > > Cedric. > >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >> > I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >> > >> > My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with eth0. >> > I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the STA >> > eth0. >> > >> > If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not > sent. >> > I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with VL= AN >> > tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >> > >> > I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >> > 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from >> > openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >> > >> > Thanks for your help. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >> > linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > >> >> -- >> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless"= in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <27f802e7-79c5-a17f-1883-88e62a6520ef@ezplanet.net>]
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue [not found] ` <27f802e7-79c5-a17f-1883-88e62a6520ef@ezplanet.net> @ 2016-11-04 14:41 ` Bruno Antunes 2016-11-04 17:28 ` yu-chieh kung 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-04 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mauro Mozzarelli Cc: OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrote: > Since the capability is implemented in software you might be testing the > limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. By loading the module in rawmode? The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. > > > > On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >> >> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >> >> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >> and Sta, and with no security. >> >> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >> >> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >> >> Best Regards, >> Bruno >> >> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] >>>> Envoy=C3=A9 : mercredi 9 d=C3=A9cembre 2015 16:34 >>>> =C3=80 : Cedric VONCKEN; ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless >>>> Objet : Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >>>> >>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you in >>>> other cases as well? >>> >>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Cedric. >>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >>>>> >>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with eth= 0. >>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the S= TA >>>>> eth0. >>>>> >>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not >>> >>> sent. >>>>> >>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with >>>>> VLAN >>>>> tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >>>>> >>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from >>>>> openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles= s" >>> in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-04 14:41 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] " Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-04 17:28 ` yu-chieh kung 2016-11-04 21:50 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: yu-chieh kung @ 2016-11-04 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruno Antunes Cc: Mauro Mozzarelli, OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org I met the same problem before, if i modify the 1q header to other value (0xaa00) before go into firmware. I can capture the packet in the air I think the vlan packet is dropped in firmware. 2016-11-04 22:41 GMT+08:00 Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com>: > On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrot= e: >> Since the capability is implemented in software you might be testing the >> limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. > > By loading the module in rawmode? > > The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. > >> >> >> >> On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>> >>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>> >>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >>> and Sta, and with no security. >>> >>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>> >>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Bruno >>> >>> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] >>>>> Envoy=C3=A9 : mercredi 9 d=C3=A9cembre 2015 16:34 >>>>> =C3=80 : Cedric VONCKEN; ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless >>>>> Objet : Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >>>>> >>>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you i= n >>>>> other cases as well? >>>> >>>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Cedric. >>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ben >>>>> >>>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >>>>>> >>>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with et= h0. >>>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the = STA >>>>>> eth0. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not >>>> >>>> sent. >>>>>> >>>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with >>>>>> VLAN >>>>>> tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >>>>>> >>>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >>>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from >>>>>> openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.or= g >>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>>>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wirele= ss" >>>> in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-04 17:28 ` yu-chieh kung @ 2016-11-04 21:50 ` Ben Greear 2016-11-04 22:23 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2016-11-04 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yu-chieh kung, Bruno Antunes Cc: Mauro Mozzarelli, OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org I can reproduce this in my CT firmware. I'll see if I can fix it, but for stock firmware, it might be that changing the driver to use Ethernet packet type of native-wifi would make .1q vlans work. Thanks, Ben On 11/04/2016 10:28 AM, yu-chieh kung wrote: > I met the same problem before, > if i modify the 1q header to other value (0xaa00) before go into firmware. > I can capture the packet in the air > I think the vlan packet is dropped in firmware. > > 2016-11-04 22:41 GMT+08:00 Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com>: >> On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrote: >>> Since the capability is implemented in software you might be testing the >>> limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. >> >> By loading the module in rawmode? >> >> The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>>> >>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>>> >>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >>>> and Sta, and with no security. >>>> >>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>>> >>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Bruno >>>> >>>> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] >>>>>> Envoyé : mercredi 9 décembre 2015 16:34 >>>>>> À : Cedric VONCKEN; ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless >>>>>> Objet : Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >>>>>> >>>>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you in >>>>>> other cases as well? >>>>> >>>>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Cedric. >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ben >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with eth0. >>>>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the STA >>>>>>> eth0. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not >>>>> >>>>> sent. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with >>>>>>> VLAN >>>>>>> tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >>>>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from >>>>>>> openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>>>>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" >>>>> in >>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ath10k mailing list >> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-04 21:50 ` Ben Greear @ 2016-11-04 22:23 ` Ben Greear 2016-11-05 8:05 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2016-11-07 11:54 ` Bruno Antunes 0 siblings, 2 replies; 27+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2016-11-04 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yu-chieh kung, Bruno Antunes Cc: Mauro Mozzarelli, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, OpenWrt Development List, ath10k@lists.infradead.org The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and it appears to work for me. Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure you remove/rename any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and see if that fixes your problem. Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC address for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in order for this to work. https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full-community.bin Thanks, Ben On 11/04/2016 02:50 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > I can reproduce this in my CT firmware. I'll see if I can fix it, > but for stock firmware, it might be that changing the driver to use Ethernet packet type > of native-wifi would make .1q vlans work. > > Thanks, > Ben > > On 11/04/2016 10:28 AM, yu-chieh kung wrote: >> I met the same problem before, >> if i modify the 1q header to other value (0xaa00) before go into firmware. >> I can capture the packet in the air >> I think the vlan packet is dropped in firmware. >> >> 2016-11-04 22:41 GMT+08:00 Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com>: >>> On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrote: >>>> Since the capability is implemented in software you might be testing the >>>> limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. >>> >>> By loading the module in rawmode? >>> >>> The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>>>> >>>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>>>> >>>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >>>>> and Sta, and with no security. >>>>> >>>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>>>> >>>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> Bruno >>>>> >>>>> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] >>>>>>> Envoyé : mercredi 9 décembre 2015 16:34 >>>>>>> À : Cedric VONCKEN; ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless >>>>>>> Objet : Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you in >>>>>>> other cases as well? >>>>>> >>>>>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Cedric. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Ben >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with eth0. >>>>>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the STA >>>>>>>> eth0. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not >>>>>> >>>>>> sent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with >>>>>>>> VLAN >>>>>>>> tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >>>>>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from >>>>>>>> openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>>>>>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" >>>>>> in >>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ath10k mailing list >>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >> > > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-04 22:23 ` Ben Greear @ 2016-11-05 8:05 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2016-11-05 14:35 ` Ben Greear 2016-11-07 11:54 ` Bruno Antunes 1 sibling, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Gottschall @ 2016-11-05 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Greear, yu-chieh kung, Bruno Antunes Cc: Mauro Mozzarelli, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, OpenWrt Development List, ath10k@lists.infradead.org would be good if qca can fix this bug finally in all available firmwares. its a very annoying issue since a long time Sebastian Am 04.11.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Ben Greear: > The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in > at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and it > appears > to work for me. > > Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure you > remove/rename > any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and see if that fixes your > problem. > > Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC address > for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in order for > this to work. > > https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full-community.bin > > > Thanks, > Ben > > > On 11/04/2016 02:50 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >> I can reproduce this in my CT firmware. I'll see if I can fix it, >> but for stock firmware, it might be that changing the driver to use >> Ethernet packet type >> of native-wifi would make .1q vlans work. >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> On 11/04/2016 10:28 AM, yu-chieh kung wrote: >>> I met the same problem before, >>> if i modify the 1q header to other value (0xaa00) before go into >>> firmware. >>> I can capture the packet in the air >>> I think the vlan packet is dropped in firmware. >>> >>> 2016-11-04 22:41 GMT+08:00 Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com>: >>>> On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli >>>> <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrote: >>>>> Since the capability is implemented in software you might be >>>>> testing the >>>>> limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. >>>> >>>> By loading the module in rawmode? >>>> >>>> The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>>>>> >>>>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >>>>>> and Sta, and with no security. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>>>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>>>>> >>>>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>>>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> Bruno >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] >>>>>>>> Envoyé : mercredi 9 décembre 2015 16:34 >>>>>>>> À : Cedric VONCKEN; ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless >>>>>>>> Objet : Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for >>>>>>>> you in >>>>>>>> other cases as well? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cedric. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Ben >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged >>>>>>>>> with eth0. >>>>>>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected >>>>>>>>> to the STA >>>>>>>>> eth0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames >>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sent. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the >>>>>>>>> frame with >>>>>>>>> VLAN >>>>>>>>> tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >>>>>>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from >>>>>>>>> openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>>>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to >>>>>>>>> majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>>>>>>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>>>> linux-wireless" >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ath10k mailing list >>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >>> >> >> > > -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Regards Sebastian Gottschall / CTO NewMedia-NET GmbH - DD-WRT Firmensitz: Berliner Ring 101, 64625 Bensheim Registergericht: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 25473 Geschäftsführer: Peter Steinhäuser, Christian Scheele http://www.dd-wrt.com email: s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com Tel.: +496251-582650 / Fax: +496251-5826565 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-05 8:05 ` Sebastian Gottschall @ 2016-11-05 14:35 ` Ben Greear 2016-11-15 14:37 ` voncken 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2016-11-05 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sebastian Gottschall, yu-chieh kung, Bruno Antunes Cc: Mauro Mozzarelli, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, OpenWrt Development List, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Looks to me like 10.4 defaults to the right value, but possibly there are other issues with it. I tested my CT 10.4 and it worked OK with vlans for me. Thanks, Ben On 11/05/2016 01:05 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > would be good if qca can fix this bug finally in all available firmwares. its a very annoying issue since a long time > > Sebastian > > > Am 04.11.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Ben Greear: >> The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in >> at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and it appears >> to work for me. >> >> Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure you remove/rename >> any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and see if that fixes your problem. >> >> Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC address >> for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in order for this to work. >> >> https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full-community.bin >> >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> >> On 11/04/2016 02:50 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>> I can reproduce this in my CT firmware. I'll see if I can fix it, >>> but for stock firmware, it might be that changing the driver to use Ethernet packet type >>> of native-wifi would make .1q vlans work. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ben >>> >>> On 11/04/2016 10:28 AM, yu-chieh kung wrote: >>>> I met the same problem before, >>>> if i modify the 1q header to other value (0xaa00) before go into firmware. >>>> I can capture the packet in the air >>>> I think the vlan packet is dropped in firmware. >>>> >>>> 2016-11-04 22:41 GMT+08:00 Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com>: >>>>> On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrote: >>>>>> Since the capability is implemented in software you might be testing the >>>>>> limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. >>>>> >>>>> By loading the module in rawmode? >>>>> >>>>> The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >>>>>>> and Sta, and with no security. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>>>>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>>>>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>> Bruno >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] >>>>>>>>> Envoyé : mercredi 9 décembre 2015 16:34 >>>>>>>>> À : Cedric VONCKEN; ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless >>>>>>>>> Objet : Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you in >>>>>>>>> other cases as well? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cedric. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Ben >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with eth0. >>>>>>>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the STA >>>>>>>>>> eth0. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sent. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with >>>>>>>>>> VLAN >>>>>>>>>> tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >>>>>>>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from >>>>>>>>>> openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>>>>>>>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ath10k mailing list >>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* RE: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-05 14:35 ` Ben Greear @ 2016-11-15 14:37 ` voncken 2016-11-15 14:55 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: voncken @ 2016-11-15 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Ben Greear' Cc: linux-wireless, 'OpenWrt Development List', ath10k Hi Ben, Do you plan to release a candelatech firmware with this fix? Regards. Cedric Voncken. > -----Message d'origine----- > De : linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless- > owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Ben Greear > Envoyé : samedi 5 novembre 2016 15:35 > À : Sebastian Gottschall; yu-chieh kung; Bruno Antunes > Cc : Mauro Mozzarelli; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; OpenWrt > Development List; ath10k@lists.infradead.org > Objet : Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue > > Looks to me like 10.4 defaults to the right value, but possibly there > are other issues with it. I tested my CT 10.4 and it worked OK with > vlans for me. > > Thanks, > Ben > > On 11/05/2016 01:05 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > > would be good if qca can fix this bug finally in all available > > firmwares. its a very annoying issue since a long time > > > > Sebastian > > > > > > Am 04.11.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Ben Greear: > >> The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in > >> at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and > it > >> appears to work for me. > >> > >> Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure > >> you remove/rename any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and > see if that fixes your problem. > >> > >> Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC > >> address for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in > order for this to work. > >> > >> https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full- > community.b > >> in > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ben > >> > >> > >> On 11/04/2016 02:50 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > >>> I can reproduce this in my CT firmware. I'll see if I can fix it, > >>> but for stock firmware, it might be that changing the driver to use > >>> Ethernet packet type of native-wifi would make .1q vlans work. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Ben > >>> > >>> On 11/04/2016 10:28 AM, yu-chieh kung wrote: > >>>> I met the same problem before, > >>>> if i modify the 1q header to other value (0xaa00) before go into > firmware. > >>>> I can capture the packet in the air I think the vlan packet is > >>>> dropped in firmware. > >>>> > >>>> 2016-11-04 22:41 GMT+08:00 Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com>: > >>>>> On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli > <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrote: > >>>>>> Since the capability is implemented in software you might be > >>>>>> testing the limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. > >>>>> > >>>>> By loading the module in rawmode? > >>>>> > >>>>> The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP and > >>>>>>> Sta, and with no security. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, > >>>>>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. > >>>>>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>> Bruno > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> > wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- > >>>>>>>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] Envoyé : > >>>>>>>>> mercredi 9 décembre 2015 16:34 À : Cedric VONCKEN; > >>>>>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless Objet : Re: ATH10K > >>>>>>>>> VLAN firmware issue > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken > >>>>>>>>> for you in other cases as well? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cedric. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> Ben > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged > with eth0. > >>>>>>>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected > >>>>>>>>>> to the STA eth0. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames > >>>>>>>>>> are not > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> sent. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the > >>>>>>>>>> frame with VLAN tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, > >>>>>>>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 > >>>>>>>>>> from openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > >>>>>>>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to > >>>>>>>>>> majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at > >>>>>>>>>> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc > >>>>>>>>> http://www.candelatech.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-wireless" > >>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More > >>>>>>>> majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list > >>>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > >>>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt- > devel > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list > >>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > >>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> ath10k mailing list > >>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org > >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-15 14:37 ` voncken @ 2016-11-15 14:55 ` Ben Greear 2016-11-15 15:00 ` Bruno Antunes 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2016-11-15 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: voncken; +Cc: linux-wireless, 'OpenWrt Development List', ath10k The beta-18 release on my web page has the fix and should work fine. Probably soon I will promote the beta-18 to final release status. Any help in testing and verifying the beta works well is welcome. Thanks, Ben On 11/15/2016 06:37 AM, voncken wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Do you plan to release a candelatech firmware with this fix? > > Regards. > > Cedric Voncken. >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless- >> owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Ben Greear >> Envoyé : samedi 5 novembre 2016 15:35 >> À : Sebastian Gottschall; yu-chieh kung; Bruno Antunes >> Cc : Mauro Mozzarelli; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; OpenWrt >> Development List; ath10k@lists.infradead.org >> Objet : Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >> >> Looks to me like 10.4 defaults to the right value, but possibly there >> are other issues with it. I tested my CT 10.4 and it worked OK with >> vlans for me. >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> On 11/05/2016 01:05 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >>> would be good if qca can fix this bug finally in all available >>> firmwares. its a very annoying issue since a long time >>> >>> Sebastian >>> >>> >>> Am 04.11.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Ben Greear: >>>> The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in >>>> at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and >> it >>>> appears to work for me. >>>> >>>> Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure >>>> you remove/rename any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and >> see if that fixes your problem. >>>> >>>> Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC >>>> address for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in >> order for this to work. >>>> >>>> https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full- >> community.b >>>> in >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/04/2016 02:50 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>>>> I can reproduce this in my CT firmware. I'll see if I can fix it, >>>>> but for stock firmware, it might be that changing the driver to use >>>>> Ethernet packet type of native-wifi would make .1q vlans work. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ben >>>>> >>>>> On 11/04/2016 10:28 AM, yu-chieh kung wrote: >>>>>> I met the same problem before, >>>>>> if i modify the 1q header to other value (0xaa00) before go into >> firmware. >>>>>> I can capture the packet in the air I think the vlan packet is >>>>>> dropped in firmware. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2016-11-04 22:41 GMT+08:00 Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli >> <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> Since the capability is implemented in software you might be >>>>>>>> testing the limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By loading the module in rawmode? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP and >>>>>>>>> Sta, and with no security. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>>>>>>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>>>>>>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>> Bruno >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>>>>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] Envoyé : >>>>>>>>>>> mercredi 9 décembre 2015 16:34 À : Cedric VONCKEN; >>>>>>>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless Objet : Re: ATH10K >>>>>>>>>>> VLAN firmware issue >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken >>>>>>>>>>> for you in other cases as well? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cedric. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Ben >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged >> with eth0. >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected >>>>>>>>>>>> to the STA eth0. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames >>>>>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sent. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the >>>>>>>>>>>> frame with VLAN tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >>>>>>>>>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 >>>>>>>>>>>> from openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to >>>>>>>>>>>> majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at >>>>>>>>>>>> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.candelatech.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >> linux-wireless" >>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More >>>>>>>>>> majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt- >> devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> ath10k mailing list >>>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-15 14:55 ` Ben Greear @ 2016-11-15 15:00 ` Bruno Antunes 2016-11-15 15:06 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-15 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Greear Cc: voncken, OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 15 November 2016 at 14:55, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: > The beta-18 release on my web page has the fix and should work fine. > > Probably soon I will promote the beta-18 to final release > status. Any help in testing and verifying the beta works well > is welcome. I will also do testing with that version. For clarity can I refer you and your firmware releases in the bug report? Thanks, Bruno > > Thanks, > Ben > > On 11/15/2016 06:37 AM, voncken wrote: >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> Do you plan to release a candelatech firmware with this fix? >> >> Regards. >> >> Cedric Voncken. >>> >>> -----Message d'origine----- >>> De : linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless- >>> owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Ben Greear >>> Envoy=C3=A9 : samedi 5 novembre 2016 15:35 >>> =C3=80 : Sebastian Gottschall; yu-chieh kung; Bruno Antunes >>> Cc : Mauro Mozzarelli; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; OpenWrt >>> Development List; ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>> Objet : Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >>> >>> >>> Looks to me like 10.4 defaults to the right value, but possibly there >>> are other issues with it. I tested my CT 10.4 and it worked OK with >>> vlans for me. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ben >>> >>> On 11/05/2016 01:05 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >>>> >>>> would be good if qca can fix this bug finally in all available >>>> firmwares. its a very annoying issue since a long time >>>> >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 04.11.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Ben Greear: >>>>> >>>>> The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in >>>>> at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and >>> >>> it >>>>> >>>>> appears to work for me. >>>>> >>>>> Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure >>>>> you remove/rename any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and >>> >>> see if that fixes your problem. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC >>>>> address for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in >>> >>> order for this to work. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full- >>> >>> community.b >>>>> >>>>> in >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ben >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/04/2016 02:50 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I can reproduce this in my CT firmware. I'll see if I can fix it, >>>>>> but for stock firmware, it might be that changing the driver to use >>>>>> Ethernet packet type of native-wifi would make .1q vlans work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ben >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/04/2016 10:28 AM, yu-chieh kung wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I met the same problem before, >>>>>>> if i modify the 1q header to other value (0xaa00) before go into >>> >>> firmware. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can capture the packet in the air I think the vlan packet is >>>>>>> dropped in firmware. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2016-11-04 22:41 GMT+08:00 Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli >>> >>> <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Since the capability is implemented in software you might be >>>>>>>>> testing the limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By loading the module in rawmode? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP and >>>>>>>>>> Sta, and with no security. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>>>>>>>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>>>>>>>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Bruno >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> >>> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>>>>>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] Envoy=C3=A9 : >>>>>>>>>>>> mercredi 9 d=C3=A9cembre 2015 16:34 =C3=80 : Cedric VONCKEN; >>>>>>>>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless Objet : Re: ATH10K >>>>>>>>>>>> VLAN firmware issue >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken >>>>>>>>>>>> for you in other cases as well? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cedric. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Ben >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged >>> >>> with eth0. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected >>>>>>>>>>>>> to the STA eth0. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames >>>>>>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> sent. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the >>>>>>>>>>>>> frame with VLAN tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> from openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to >>>>>>>>>>>>> majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.candelatech.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>> >>> linux-wireless" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More >>>>>>>>>>> majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt- >>> >>> devel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> ath10k mailing list >>>>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >> >> > > -- > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-15 15:00 ` Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-15 15:06 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2016-11-15 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruno Antunes Cc: voncken, OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 11/15/2016 07:00 AM, Bruno Antunes wrote: > On 15 November 2016 at 14:55, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: >> The beta-18 release on my web page has the fix and should work fine. >> >> Probably soon I will promote the beta-18 to final release >> status. Any help in testing and verifying the beta works well >> is welcome. > > I will also do testing with that version. > > For clarity can I refer you and your firmware releases in the bug report? It is fine by me. It is a one-line patch to fix the firmware...QCA can ask me as well if they don't figure it out on their own. Thanks, Ben > > Thanks, > Bruno >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> On 11/15/2016 06:37 AM, voncken wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ben, >>> >>> Do you plan to release a candelatech firmware with this fix? >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Cedric Voncken. >>>> >>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>> De : linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless- >>>> owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Ben Greear >>>> Envoyé : samedi 5 novembre 2016 15:35 >>>> À : Sebastian Gottschall; yu-chieh kung; Bruno Antunes >>>> Cc : Mauro Mozzarelli; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; OpenWrt >>>> Development List; ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>> Objet : Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue >>>> >>>> >>>> Looks to me like 10.4 defaults to the right value, but possibly there >>>> are other issues with it. I tested my CT 10.4 and it worked OK with >>>> vlans for me. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> On 11/05/2016 01:05 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >>>>> >>>>> would be good if qca can fix this bug finally in all available >>>>> firmwares. its a very annoying issue since a long time >>>>> >>>>> Sebastian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 04.11.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Ben Greear: >>>>>> >>>>>> The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in >>>>>> at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and >>>> >>>> it >>>>>> >>>>>> appears to work for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure >>>>>> you remove/rename any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and >>>> >>>> see if that fixes your problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC >>>>>> address for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in >>>> >>>> order for this to work. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full- >>>> >>>> community.b >>>>>> >>>>>> in >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ben >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/04/2016 02:50 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can reproduce this in my CT firmware. I'll see if I can fix it, >>>>>>> but for stock firmware, it might be that changing the driver to use >>>>>>> Ethernet packet type of native-wifi would make .1q vlans work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Ben >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/04/2016 10:28 AM, yu-chieh kung wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I met the same problem before, >>>>>>>> if i modify the 1q header to other value (0xaa00) before go into >>>> >>>> firmware. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can capture the packet in the air I think the vlan packet is >>>>>>>> dropped in firmware. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2016-11-04 22:41 GMT+08:00 Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 4 November 2016 at 14:18, Mauro Mozzarelli >>>> >>>> <openwrt@ezplanet.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Since the capability is implemented in software you might be >>>>>>>>>> testing the limit of your router's CPU i/o speed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> By loading the module in rawmode? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The AP is an APU and Sta is an APU2. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP and >>>>>>>>>>> Sta, and with no security. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>>>>>>>>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Bruno >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>>>>>>>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] Envoyé : >>>>>>>>>>>>> mercredi 9 décembre 2015 16:34 À : Cedric VONCKEN; >>>>>>>>>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org; linux-wireless Objet : Re: ATH10K >>>>>>>>>>>>> VLAN firmware issue >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken >>>>>>>>>>>>> for you in other cases as well? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cedric. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ben >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged >>>> >>>> with eth0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the STA eth0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> sent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> frame with VLAN tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> linux-wireless" in the body of a message to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.candelatech.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>>> >>>> linux-wireless" >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More >>>>>>>>>>>> majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt- >>>> >>>> devel >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> ath10k mailing list >>>>>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-04 22:23 ` Ben Greear 2016-11-05 8:05 ` Sebastian Gottschall @ 2016-11-07 11:54 ` Bruno Antunes 2016-11-07 14:06 ` Ben Greear 1 sibling, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-07 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Greear Cc: yu-chieh kung, Mauro Mozzarelli, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, OpenWrt Development List, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 4 November 2016 at 22:23, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: > The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in > at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and it > appears > to work for me. > > Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure you > remove/rename > any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and see if that fixes your > problem. Thanks for the fast reply but it only solves "half" the problem. Now the connection between the AP and the Sta can be secure and the driver doesn't need to be loaded in rawmode. Unfortunatly the the throughput is still bad. iperf3 -c 10.10.4.15 Connecting to host 10.10.4.15, port 5201 [ 4] local 10.10.4.16 port 44893 connected to 10.10.4.15 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.01 sec 42.4 KBytes 345 Kbits/sec 6 1.41 KBytes [ 4] 1.01-2.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 1 1.41 KBytes [ 4] 2.01-3.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 1 1.41 KBytes [ 4] 3.01-4.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes [ 4] 4.01-5.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes [ 4] 5.01-6.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes [ 4] 6.01-7.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 1 1.41 KBytes [ 4] 7.01-8.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes [ 4] 8.01-9.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes [ 4] 9.01-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 42.4 KBytes 34.7 Kbits/sec 9 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec receiver iperf Done. > > Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC address > for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in order for this to > work. Can you please elaborate more? My setup is the folowing. The connection between the AP and Sta is in WDS For the moment all devices are in the same VLAN. client1 --- SW1 ---- AP ...... Sta ---- SW2 --- client2 Thanks, Bruno > > https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full-community.bin > > > Thanks, > Ben > > > > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-07 11:54 ` Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-07 14:06 ` Ben Greear 2016-11-07 14:13 ` Bruno Antunes 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2016-11-07 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruno Antunes Cc: yu-chieh kung, Mauro Mozzarelli, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, OpenWrt Development List, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 11/07/2016 03:54 AM, Bruno Antunes wrote: > On 4 November 2016 at 22:23, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: >> The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in >> at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and it >> appears >> to work for me. >> >> Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure you >> remove/rename >> any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and see if that fixes your >> problem. > > Thanks for the fast reply but it only solves "half" the problem. > > Now the connection between the AP and the Sta can be secure and the > driver doesn't need to be loaded in rawmode. > > Unfortunatly the the throughput is still bad. > > iperf3 -c 10.10.4.15 > Connecting to host 10.10.4.15, port 5201 > [ 4] local 10.10.4.16 port 44893 connected to 10.10.4.15 port 5201 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd > [ 4] 0.00-1.01 sec 42.4 KBytes 345 Kbits/sec 6 1.41 KBytes > [ 4] 1.01-2.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 1 1.41 KBytes > [ 4] 2.01-3.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 1 1.41 KBytes > [ 4] 3.01-4.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes > [ 4] 4.01-5.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes > [ 4] 5.01-6.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes > [ 4] 6.01-7.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 1 1.41 KBytes > [ 4] 7.01-8.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes > [ 4] 8.01-9.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes > [ 4] 9.01-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr > [ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 42.4 KBytes 34.7 Kbits/sec 9 sender > [ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec receiver You have a complex setup, so I think it would be best if you could break it into simpler parts to test. First, try just STA to AP, no vlans, and see if you get useful throughput. Then try with VLANs Then, try with WDS. Then try with WDS and vlans. In STA to AP mode with VLANs, it performed well for me. Thanks, Ben > > iperf Done. > >> >> Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC address >> for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in order for this to >> work. > > Can you please elaborate more? > My setup is the folowing. > The connection between the AP and Sta is in WDS > For the moment all devices are in the same VLAN. > > client1 --- SW1 ---- AP ...... Sta ---- SW2 --- client2 > > > Thanks, > Bruno > >> >> https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full-community.bin >> >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> >> > >> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >> > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-07 14:06 ` Ben Greear @ 2016-11-07 14:13 ` Bruno Antunes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread From: Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-07 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Greear Cc: yu-chieh kung, Mauro Mozzarelli, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, OpenWrt Development List, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 7 November 2016 at 14:06, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: > On 11/07/2016 03:54 AM, Bruno Antunes wrote: >> >> On 4 November 2016 at 22:23, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: >>> >>> The bug appears that vlan-tx-stripping is unconditionally enabled in >>> at least my firmware. I have re-compiled w/out that flag set, and it >>> appears >>> to work for me. >>> >>> Please download this firmware, rename it firmware-2.bin, make sure you >>> remove/rename >>> any firmware-5.bin (etc) so mine will load, and see if that fixes your >>> problem. >> >> >> Thanks for the fast reply but it only solves "half" the problem. >> >> Now the connection between the AP and the Sta can be secure and the >> driver doesn't need to be loaded in rawmode. >> >> Unfortunatly the the throughput is still bad. >> >> iperf3 -c 10.10.4.15 >> Connecting to host 10.10.4.15, port 5201 >> [ 4] local 10.10.4.16 port 44893 connected to 10.10.4.15 port 5201 >> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd >> [ 4] 0.00-1.01 sec 42.4 KBytes 345 Kbits/sec 6 1.41 KBytes >> [ 4] 1.01-2.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 1 1.41 KBytes >> [ 4] 2.01-3.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 1 1.41 KBytes >> [ 4] 3.01-4.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes >> [ 4] 4.01-5.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes >> [ 4] 5.01-6.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes >> [ 4] 6.01-7.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 1 1.41 KBytes >> [ 4] 7.01-8.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes >> [ 4] 8.01-9.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes >> [ 4] 9.01-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 1.41 KBytes >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr >> [ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 42.4 KBytes 34.7 Kbits/sec 9 >> sender >> [ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec >> receiver > > > You have a complex setup, so I think it would be best if you could break it > into > simpler parts to test. Some of the parts I already tested and are working > > First, try just STA to AP, no vlans, and see if you get useful throughput. > Works fine > Then try with VLANs > To Do > Then, try with WDS. Works fine > > Then try with WDS and vlans. > The ultimate goal... > In STA to AP mode with VLANs, it performed well for me. > > Thanks, > Ben > > >> >> iperf Done. >> >>> >>> Please note that it is very likely you will have to use same MAC address >>> for the VLAN devices that the underlying station uses in order for this >>> to >>> work. >> >> >> Can you please elaborate more? >> My setup is the folowing. >> The connection between the AP and Sta is in WDS >> For the moment all devices are in the same VLAN. >> >> client1 --- SW1 ---- AP ...... Sta ---- SW2 --- client2 >> >> >> Thanks, >> Bruno >> >>> >>> https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/tmp/firmware-2-full-community.bin >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ben >>> >>> >>> >> >>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>> >> > > -- > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-04 14:13 ` Bruno Antunes [not found] ` <27f802e7-79c5-a17f-1883-88e62a6520ef@ezplanet.net> @ 2016-11-04 21:17 ` Valo, Kalle 2016-11-07 12:01 ` Bruno Antunes 1 sibling, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Valo, Kalle @ 2016-11-04 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruno Antunes Cc: voncken, OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: > Old thread but I think the issue is still present. > > I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. > > To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP > and Sta, and with no security. > > I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, > 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. > > Although it works the throughput is very bad. > Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ --=20 Kalle Valo= ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-04 21:17 ` Valo, Kalle @ 2016-11-07 12:01 ` Bruno Antunes 2016-11-07 18:06 ` Valo, Kalle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-07 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Valo, Kalle Cc: voncken, OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote: > Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: > >> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >> >> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >> >> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >> and Sta, and with no security. >> >> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >> >> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. > > Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is > properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better. > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ I will file a bug report. But since it appears to be a firmware related issue under what category can fill in the bug? Thanks, Bruno > > -- > Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-07 12:01 ` Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-07 18:06 ` Valo, Kalle 2016-11-07 18:40 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] " Bruno Antunes 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Valo, Kalle @ 2016-11-07 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: voncken, OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: > On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote: >> Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>> >>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>> >>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >>> and Sta, and with no security. >>> >>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>> >>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >> >> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is >> properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better. >> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ > > I will file a bug report. Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to find the relevant info. > But since it appears to be a firmware related issue > under what category can fill in the bug? You can file it under Drivers/network-wireless, AFAIK we don't have any separate components for firmware bugs. Here's one example to follow: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D186161 --=20 Kalle Valo= ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-07 18:06 ` Valo, Kalle @ 2016-11-07 18:40 ` Bruno Antunes 2016-11-15 13:43 ` Valo, Kalle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-07 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Valo, Kalle Cc: OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, voncken On 7 November 2016 at 18:06, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote: > Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote: >>> Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >>>> >>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >>>> >>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >>>> and Sta, and with no security. >>>> >>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >>>> >>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. >>> >>> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is >>> properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better. >>> >>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ >> >> I will file a bug report. > > Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to find > the relevant info. Just file the bug with the ID 187241 - VLAN support in ATH10k Feel free to ask for adicional info. I did not mention any names in the bug report fell free to take credit if wanted. Regards, Bruno > >> But since it appears to be a firmware related issue >> under what category can fill in the bug? > > You can file it under Drivers/network-wireless, AFAIK we don't have any > separate components for firmware bugs. Here's one example to follow: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186161 > > -- > Kalle Valo > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-07 18:40 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] " Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-15 13:43 ` Valo, Kalle 2016-11-15 14:53 ` Bruno Antunes 2017-02-21 12:59 ` voncken 0 siblings, 2 replies; 27+ messages in thread From: Valo, Kalle @ 2016-11-15 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruno Antunes Cc: OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless, voncken, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: > On 7 November 2016 at 18:06, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote: >> Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote= : >>> >>>> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is >>>> properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better. >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ >>> >>> I will file a bug report. >> >> Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to find >> the relevant info. > > Just file the bug with the ID 187241 - VLAN support in ATH10k Feel > free to ask for adicional info. I did not mention any names in the bug > report fell free to take credit if wanted. Thanks. I'll report it to the firmware team, let's see what happens. If there's more information which might help to fix this feel free to update that to the bug report. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D187241 --=20 Kalle Valo= ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-15 13:43 ` Valo, Kalle @ 2016-11-15 14:53 ` Bruno Antunes 2017-02-21 12:59 ` voncken 1 sibling, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread From: Bruno Antunes @ 2016-11-15 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Valo, Kalle Cc: OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless, voncken, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Ben Greear On 15 November 2016 at 13:43, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote: > Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 7 November 2016 at 18:06, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote: >>> Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is >>>>> properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better. >>>>> >>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ >>>> >>>> I will file a bug report. >>> >>> Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to find >>> the relevant info. >> >> Just file the bug with the ID 187241 - VLAN support in ATH10k Feel >> free to ask for adicional info. I did not mention any names in the bug >> report fell free to take credit if wanted. > > Thanks. I'll report it to the firmware team, let's see what happens. If > there's more information which might help to fix this feel free to > update that to the bug report. I'm finishing my tests and will update the bug report ASAP. Turns out the bad throughput was the result of a failure in the switch port. With Ben's firmware the VLAN support is working fine with security. Thanks, Bruno > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187241 > > -- > Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* RE: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2016-11-15 13:43 ` Valo, Kalle 2016-11-15 14:53 ` Bruno Antunes @ 2017-02-21 12:59 ` voncken 2017-02-21 13:19 ` Valo, Kalle 1 sibling, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread From: voncken @ 2017-02-21 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Valo, Kalle' Cc: 'OpenWrt Development List', 'linux-wireless', ath10k Kalle, Do you know if the firmware team planned to fix the VLAN issue on ath10k firmware? Thanks for your help. Cedric. > -----Message d'origine----- > De : linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless- > owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Valo, Kalle > Envoyé : mardi 15 novembre 2016 14:44 > À : Bruno Antunes > Cc : OpenWrt Development List; linux-wireless; voncken; > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > Objet : Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue > > Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 7 November 2016 at 18:06, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> > wrote: > >> Bruno Antunes <baantunes@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >>> On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info > >>>> is properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the > better. > >>>> > >>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ > >>> > >>> I will file a bug report. > >> > >> Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to > >> find the relevant info. > > > > Just file the bug with the ID 187241 - VLAN support in ATH10k Feel > > free to ask for adicional info. I did not mention any names in the > bug > > report fell free to take credit if wanted. > > Thanks. I'll report it to the firmware team, let's see what happens. If > there's more information which might help to fix this feel free to > update that to the bug report. > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187241 > > -- > Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2017-02-21 12:59 ` voncken @ 2017-02-21 13:19 ` Valo, Kalle [not found] ` <CAKR_QVLpSWab-kF-f8=xqw+oWAfA966GDm7CtXrWfzmJz8gP-w@mail.gmail.com> 2017-02-22 13:55 ` voncken 0 siblings, 2 replies; 27+ messages in thread From: Valo, Kalle @ 2017-02-21 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: voncken Cc: 'OpenWrt Development List', 'linux-wireless', ath10k@lists.infradead.org voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> writes: > Do you know if the firmware team planned to fix the VLAN issue on ath10k > firmware? I reported it forward only this week. --=20 Kalle Valo= ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAKR_QVLpSWab-kF-f8=xqw+oWAfA966GDm7CtXrWfzmJz8gP-w@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue [not found] ` <CAKR_QVLpSWab-kF-f8=xqw+oWAfA966GDm7CtXrWfzmJz8gP-w@mail.gmail.com> @ 2017-02-21 16:47 ` Bruno Antunes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread From: Bruno Antunes @ 2017-02-21 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Psyborg Cc: Valo, Kalle, OpenWrt Development List, linux-wireless, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, voncken On 21 February 2017 at 13:42, Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@gmail.com> wrote: > have you tried this one > https://forum.lede-project.org/t/new-qca988x-firmware-with-mesh-support/1587 >From my testing it does not work. > > On 21 February 2017 at 14:19, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote: >> >> voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> writes: >> >> > Do you know if the firmware team planned to fix the VLAN issue on ath10k >> > firmware? >> >> I reported it forward only this week. >> >> -- >> Kalle Valo >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* RE: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue 2017-02-21 13:19 ` Valo, Kalle [not found] ` <CAKR_QVLpSWab-kF-f8=xqw+oWAfA966GDm7CtXrWfzmJz8gP-w@mail.gmail.com> @ 2017-02-22 13:55 ` voncken 1 sibling, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread From: voncken @ 2017-02-22 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Valo, Kalle' Cc: 'OpenWrt Development List', 'linux-wireless', ath10k Thanks for your answer, How I can know when this issue will be fixed in ath10k firmware mainline? Do you know if Qualcomm publish a release note for this firmware? > -----Message d'origine----- > De : linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless- > owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Valo, Kalle > Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 14:19 > À : voncken > Cc : 'OpenWrt Development List'; 'linux-wireless'; > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > Objet : Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue > > voncken <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr> writes: > > > Do you know if the firmware team planned to fix the VLAN issue on > > ath10k firmware? > > I reported it forward only this week. > > -- > Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-22 13:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-08 14:29 ATH10K VLAN firmware issue Cedric VONCKEN
2015-12-09 15:33 ` Ben Greear
2015-12-09 17:24 ` voncken
2016-11-04 14:13 ` Bruno Antunes
[not found] ` <27f802e7-79c5-a17f-1883-88e62a6520ef@ezplanet.net>
2016-11-04 14:41 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] " Bruno Antunes
2016-11-04 17:28 ` yu-chieh kung
2016-11-04 21:50 ` Ben Greear
2016-11-04 22:23 ` Ben Greear
2016-11-05 8:05 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2016-11-05 14:35 ` Ben Greear
2016-11-15 14:37 ` voncken
2016-11-15 14:55 ` Ben Greear
2016-11-15 15:00 ` Bruno Antunes
2016-11-15 15:06 ` Ben Greear
2016-11-07 11:54 ` Bruno Antunes
2016-11-07 14:06 ` Ben Greear
2016-11-07 14:13 ` Bruno Antunes
2016-11-04 21:17 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-11-07 12:01 ` Bruno Antunes
2016-11-07 18:06 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-11-07 18:40 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] " Bruno Antunes
2016-11-15 13:43 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-11-15 14:53 ` Bruno Antunes
2017-02-21 12:59 ` voncken
2017-02-21 13:19 ` Valo, Kalle
[not found] ` <CAKR_QVLpSWab-kF-f8=xqw+oWAfA966GDm7CtXrWfzmJz8gP-w@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-21 16:47 ` Bruno Antunes
2017-02-22 13:55 ` voncken
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).