From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] cfg80211: NL80211_ATTR_SOCKET_OWNER support for CMD_CONNECT
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 01:07:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5847B51A.6090303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481093287.4092.20.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Hi Johannes,
On 12/07/2016 12:48 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 00:40 -0600, Denis Kenzior wrote:
>>
>>> No, this is the part you didn't understand. Simply authenticating
>>> doesn't actually create anything like a "link" to the AP. The only
>>
>> Okay, but it is then a bit misleading that iw link reports us being
>> 'connected' during this time for example.
>
> It doesn't!
>
> # iw wlan0 auth <ssid> <bssid> open 2462
>
> -> iw event reporting
> wlan0 (phy #0): auth <localMAC> -> <bssid> status: 0: Successful
>
> # iw wlan0 link
> Not connected.
>
Yes, you're right. It is iw info that shows us 'connected'
< Request: Get Interface (0x05) len 8 [ack] 35235.316448
Interface Index: 3 (0x00000003)
> Result: New Interface (0x07) len 108 35235.316455
Interface Index: 3 (0x00000003)
Interface Name: wlp2s0
Wiphy: 0 (0x00000000)
Interface Type: 2 (0x00000002)
Wireless Device: 1 (0x0000000000000001)
Generation: 5 (0x00000005)
Wiphy Frequency: 2417 (0x00000971)
Wiphy Channel Type: 1 (0x00000001)
Channel Width: 1 (0x00000001)
Center Frequency 1: 2417 (0x00000971)
Wiphy TX Power Level: 2200 (0x00000898)
> Response: Get Interface (0x05) len 4 35235.316457
Status: Success (0)
>
>> Fair enough. I think we can live with that since we're not using
>> CMD_AUTHENTICATE unless we need to roam using FT.
>
> That seems like a very strange decision, but it's obviously up to you
> :)
>
Care to elaborate ?
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-07 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-02 20:56 [PATCH][RFC] cfg80211: NL80211_ATTR_SOCKET_OWNER support for CMD_CONNECT Andrew Zaborowski
2016-12-05 13:51 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-05 14:55 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-05 14:58 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-05 15:05 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-05 15:14 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-05 15:32 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-06 7:16 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-06 21:42 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-07 1:40 ` Andrew Zaborowski
2016-12-07 6:19 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-07 9:49 ` Andrew Zaborowski
2016-12-07 6:15 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-07 6:40 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-07 6:48 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-07 7:07 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2016-12-07 7:38 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-05 15:40 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5847B51A.6090303@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.zaborowski@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).