From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>,
Martin Kaistra <martin.kaistra@linutronix.de>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 19/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: add hw crypto support for AP mode
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 01:32:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61d5c08b-d924-42ad-8a56-ba3ddb970297@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64617033bcdc445091186070350a0d20@realtek.com>
On 25/02/2026 04:28, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> Martin Kaistra <martin.kaistra@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> Am 21.02.26 um 23:09 schrieb Bitterblue Smith:
>>> On 22/12/2023 12:14, Martin Kaistra wrote:
>>>> Add a custom function for allocating entries in the sec cam. This allows
>>>> us to store multiple keys with the same keyidx.
>>>>
>>>> The maximum number of sec cam entries for 8188f is 16 according to the
>>>> vendor driver. Add the number to rtl8xxxu_fileops, so that other chips
>>>> which might support more entries, can set a different number there.
>>>>
>>>> Set the bssid as mac address for group keys instead of just using the
>>>> ethernet broadcast address and use BIT(6) in the sec cam ctrl entry
>>>> for differentiating them from pairwise keys like in the vendor driver.
>>>>
>>>> Add the TXDESC_EN_DESC_ID bit and the hw_key_idx to tx
>>>> broadcast/multicast packets in AP mode.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, allow the usage of rtl8xxxu_set_key() for AP mode.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kaistra <martin.kaistra@linutronix.de>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h | 5 ++
>>>> .../realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8188f.c | 1 +
>>>> .../wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 48 +++++++++++++++----
>>>> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
>>>> index c5e6d8f7d26bd..62e6318bc0924 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
>>>> @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ struct rtl8xxxu_txdesc40 {
>>>> #define DESC_RATE_ID_SHIFT 16
>>>> #define DESC_RATE_ID_MASK 0xf
>>>> #define TXDESC_NAVUSEHDR BIT(20)
>>>> +#define TXDESC_EN_DESC_ID BIT(21)
>>>> #define TXDESC_SEC_RC4 0x00400000
>>>> #define TXDESC_SEC_AES 0x00c00000
>>>> #define TXDESC_PKT_OFFSET_SHIFT 26
>>>> @@ -1775,6 +1776,7 @@ struct rtl8xxxu_cfo_tracking {
>>>> #define RTL8XXXU_MAX_MAC_ID_NUM 128
>>>> #define RTL8XXXU_BC_MC_MACID 0
>>>> #define RTL8XXXU_BC_MC_MACID1 1
>>>> +#define RTL8XXXU_MAX_SEC_CAM_NUM 64
>>>>
>>>> struct rtl8xxxu_priv {
>>>> struct ieee80211_hw *hw;
>>>> @@ -1908,6 +1910,7 @@ struct rtl8xxxu_priv {
>>>> char led_name[32];
>>>> struct led_classdev led_cdev;
>>>> DECLARE_BITMAP(mac_id_map, RTL8XXXU_MAX_MAC_ID_NUM);
>>>> + DECLARE_BITMAP(cam_map, RTL8XXXU_MAX_SEC_CAM_NUM);
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct rtl8xxxu_sta_info {
>>>> @@ -1919,6 +1922,7 @@ struct rtl8xxxu_sta_info {
>>>>
>>>> struct rtl8xxxu_vif {
>>>> int port_num;
>>>> + u8 hw_key_idx;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct rtl8xxxu_rx_urb {
>>>> @@ -1993,6 +1997,7 @@ struct rtl8xxxu_fileops {
>>>> u16 max_aggr_num;
>>>> u8 supports_ap:1;
>>>> u16 max_macid_num;
>>>> + u16 max_sec_cam_num;
>>>> u32 adda_1t_init;
>>>> u32 adda_1t_path_on;
>>>> u32 adda_2t_path_on_a;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8188f.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8188f.c
>>>> index 1e1c8fa194cb8..574a5fe951543 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8188f.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8188f.c
>>>> @@ -1751,6 +1751,7 @@ struct rtl8xxxu_fileops rtl8188fu_fops = {
>>>> .max_aggr_num = 0x0c14,
>>>> .supports_ap = 1,
>>>> .max_macid_num = 16,
>>>> + .max_sec_cam_num = 16,
>>>> .adda_1t_init = 0x03c00014,
>>>> .adda_1t_path_on = 0x03c00014,
>>>> .trxff_boundary = 0x3f7f,
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>>>> index ecf54eb8dba61..7aafae9fe76b8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>>>> @@ -4559,8 +4559,10 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_cam_write(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv,
>>>> * This is a bit of a hack - the lower bits of the cipher
>>>> * suite selector happens to match the cipher index in the CAM
>>>> */
>>>> - addr = key->keyidx << CAM_CMD_KEY_SHIFT;
>>>> + addr = key->hw_key_idx << CAM_CMD_KEY_SHIFT;
>>>> ctrl = (key->cipher & 0x0f) << 2 | key->keyidx | CAM_WRITE_VALID;
>>>> + if (!(key->flags & IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_PAIRWISE))
>>>> + ctrl |= BIT(6);
>>>>
>>>> for (j = 5; j >= 0; j--) {
>>>> switch (j) {
>>>> @@ -5546,13 +5548,14 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>>> struct rtl8xxxu_tx_urb *tx_urb;
>>>> struct ieee80211_sta *sta = NULL;
>>>> struct ieee80211_vif *vif = tx_info->control.vif;
>>>> + struct rtl8xxxu_vif *rtlvif = (struct rtl8xxxu_vif *)vif->drv_priv;
>>>> struct device *dev = &priv->udev->dev;
>>>> u32 queue, rts_rate;
>>>> u16 pktlen = skb->len;
>>>> int tx_desc_size = priv->fops->tx_desc_size;
>>>> u8 macid;
>>>> int ret;
>>>> - bool ampdu_enable, sgi = false, short_preamble = false;
>>>> + bool ampdu_enable, sgi = false, short_preamble = false, bmc = false;
>>>>
>>>> if (skb_headroom(skb) < tx_desc_size) {
>>>> dev_warn(dev,
>>>> @@ -5594,10 +5597,14 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>>> tx_desc->txdw0 =
>>>> TXDESC_OWN | TXDESC_FIRST_SEGMENT | TXDESC_LAST_SEGMENT;
>>>> if (is_multicast_ether_addr(ieee80211_get_DA(hdr)) ||
>>>> - is_broadcast_ether_addr(ieee80211_get_DA(hdr)))
>>>> + is_broadcast_ether_addr(ieee80211_get_DA(hdr))) {
>>>> tx_desc->txdw0 |= TXDESC_BROADMULTICAST;
>>>> + bmc = true;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> tx_desc->txdw1 = cpu_to_le32(queue << TXDESC_QUEUE_SHIFT);
>>>> + macid = rtl8xxxu_get_macid(priv, sta);
>>>>
>>>> if (tx_info->control.hw_key) {
>>>> switch (tx_info->control.hw_key->cipher) {
>>>> @@ -5612,6 +5619,10 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>>> default:
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> + if (bmc && rtlvif->hw_key_idx != 0xff) {
>>>> + tx_desc->txdw1 |= TXDESC_EN_DESC_ID;
>>>> + macid = rtlvif->hw_key_idx;
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* (tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) && */
>>>> @@ -5655,7 +5666,6 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>>> else
>>>> rts_rate = 0;
>>>>
>>>> - macid = rtl8xxxu_get_macid(priv, sta);
>>>> priv->fops->fill_txdesc(hw, hdr, tx_info, tx_desc, sgi, short_preamble,
>>>> ampdu_enable, rts_rate, macid);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -6667,6 +6677,7 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>>>
>>>> priv->vifs[port_num] = vif;
>>>> rtlvif->port_num = port_num;
>>>> + rtlvif->hw_key_idx = 0xff;
>>>>
>>>> rtl8xxxu_set_linktype(priv, vif->type, port_num);
>>>> ether_addr_copy(priv->mac_addr, vif->addr);
>>>> @@ -6843,11 +6854,19 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_set_rts_threshold(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 rts)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static int rtl8xxxu_get_free_sec_cam(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv = hw->priv;
>>>> +
>>>> + return find_first_zero_bit(priv->cam_map, priv->fops->max_sec_cam_num);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static int rtl8xxxu_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
>>>> struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
>>>> struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
>>>> struct ieee80211_key_conf *key)
>>>> {
>>>> + struct rtl8xxxu_vif *rtlvif = (struct rtl8xxxu_vif *)vif->drv_priv;
>>>> struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv = hw->priv;
>>>> struct device *dev = &priv->udev->dev;
>>>> u8 mac_addr[ETH_ALEN];
>>>> @@ -6859,9 +6878,6 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
>>>> dev_dbg(dev, "%s: cmd %02x, cipher %08x, index %i\n",
>>>> __func__, cmd, key->cipher, key->keyidx);
>>>>
>>>> - if (vif->type != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION)
>>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> -
>>>> if (key->keyidx > 3)
>>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -6885,7 +6901,7 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
>>>> ether_addr_copy(mac_addr, sta->addr);
>>>> } else {
>>>> dev_dbg(dev, "%s: group key\n", __func__);
>>>> - eth_broadcast_addr(mac_addr);
>>>> + ether_addr_copy(mac_addr, vif->bss_conf.bssid);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> val16 = rtl8xxxu_read16(priv, REG_CR);
>>>> @@ -6899,16 +6915,28 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
>>>>
>>>> switch (cmd) {
>>>> case SET_KEY:
>>>> - key->hw_key_idx = key->keyidx;
>>>> +
>>>> + retval = rtl8xxxu_get_free_sec_cam(hw);
>>>> + if (retval < 0)
>>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> +
>>>> + key->hw_key_idx = retval;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP && !(key->flags & IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_PAIRWISE))
>>>> + rtlvif->hw_key_idx = key->hw_key_idx;
>>>> +
>>>> key->flags |= IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_GENERATE_IV;
>>>> rtl8xxxu_cam_write(priv, key, mac_addr);
>>>> + set_bit(key->hw_key_idx, priv->cam_map);
>>>
>>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> Hi Bitterblue,
>>
>>>
>>> It turns out RTL8188CUS and RTL8192CU don't like this patch, specifically
>>> when we use iwd. After the WPA2 handshake no more data is transmitted.
>>>
>>> Before this patch, key->hw_key_idx was the same as key->keyidx. After
>>> this patch, when we use iwd, the group key is installed first. It has
>>> key->keyidx = 1, but it gets key->hw_key_idx = 0. The pairwise key is
>>> installed second. It has key->keyidx = 0, but it gets key->hw_key_idx = 1.
>>> Both keyidx and hw_key_idx are passed to the chip in rtl8xxxu_cam_write().
>>>
>>> It's fine with wpa_supplicant. wpa_supplicant installs the pairwise key
>>> first, with key->keyidx = 0, then the group key, with key->keyidx = 1.
>>>
>>> This patch imitating rtw88 makes the old chips work again with iwd.
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> So you reserve the first 4 entries for group keys and use key->keyidx as
>> key->hw_key_idx directly for those, right? Does that work if 2 virtual
>> interfaces are used at the same time?
>> I will do some tests in the next days, but I suspect this be an issue.
>
> Ah. I'm not aware that rtl8xxxu can support 2 virtual interfaces, and
> only RTL8188FU declares .supports_concurrent = 1, so maybe we can have
> special handling for this chip?
I would like to enable supports_concurrent for more chips, if I can test
this feature.
>
> I'd share some information about security CAM for reference. Since data is
> quite old (10+ years), I can't guarantee all are correct.
>
> 1. default key switch in rtl8xxxu_set_key()
> SEC_CFG_TXBC_USE_DEFKEY and SEC_CFG_RXBC_USE_DEFKEY mean that
> broadcast/multicast packets use default key (CAM entries 0~3 for
> keyidx 0~3).
> For two interfaces case, that'd a problem, so maybe we should use
> software encryption/decryption for non-pairwise key.
>
> val8 = SEC_CFG_TX_SEC_ENABLE | SEC_CFG_TXBC_USE_DEFKEY |
> SEC_CFG_RX_SEC_ENABLE | SEC_CFG_RXBC_USE_DEFKEY;
> val8 |= SEC_CFG_TX_USE_DEFKEY | SEC_CFG_RX_USE_DEFKEY;
> rtl8xxxu_write8(priv, REG_SECURITY_CFG, val8);
>
> 2. group key (GK) field of security CAM in rtl8xxxu_cam_write()
> The group key field of security CAM is BIT(6) which isn't supported
> by earlier chips (sorry I have no data about the exact chips).
>
BIT 6 is used in the rtl8188eu driver, and not used in the rtl8192cu driver,
so I assume it's just the older RTL8188CU/RTL8192CU and RTL8723AU that don't
support it.
> If a chip can support group key field, the CAM layout with default key
> enabled for two interfaces (STA-1+AP-1) can be
>
> STA-1 <-> AP-10
> AP-1 <-> STA-20
>
> CAM GK MAC KEY
> 0
> 1 1 00: AP-1 (GTK) // should be on entry 0~3 depends on key_idx
> 2
> 3
> 4
> 5 1 AP-10 AP-10 (GTK) // can be on any entry after 4
> 6
>
What are the numbers 1, 10, and 20 in "AP-1", "AP-10", "STA-20" ?
> (pairwise key can be on any entry after 4)
>
> if (!(key->flags & IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_PAIRWISE))
> ctrl |= BIT(6);
>
> My perspective are
> 1. currently default key is enabled, so we should treat CAM entry 0~3 as
> special cases. That means rtl8xxxu_get_free_sec_cam() should be modified
> as Bitterblue's version.
>
> 2. For two interfaces, I guess RTL8188FU can support GK bit, so it'd be worth
> to try the method of example 2 above.
>
> If we want earlier chips can support two interfaces, I think we should
> disable default key.
Indeed, the rtl8192cu driver (out of kernel) doesn't set SEC_CFG_TXBC_USE_DEFKEY
and SEC_CFG_RXBC_USE_DEFKEY when concurrent mode is enabled.
> Seemingly, it is not possible that using hardware
> crypto when operating one interface and then switching to use software> crypto when operating two interfaces. That means broadcast/multicast
> packets should be by software crypto entirely if we want to support two
> interfaces.
>
> 3. I think rtw88 has similar problem for two interfaces.
>
>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/core.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/core.c
>>> index ee278f0548e4..f7b35655bec5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/core.c
>>> @@ -6942,7 +6942,8 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_get_free_sec_cam(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>>> {
>>> struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv = hw->priv;
>>>
>>> - return find_first_zero_bit(priv->cam_map, priv->fops->max_sec_cam_num);
>>> + return find_next_zero_bit(priv->cam_map, priv->fops->max_sec_cam_num,
>>> + RTL8XXXU_SEC_DEFAULT_KEY_NUM);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int rtl8xxxu_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
>>> @@ -6999,12 +7000,15 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
>>>
>>> switch (cmd) {
>>> case SET_KEY:
>>> + if (key->flags & IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_PAIRWISE) {
>>> + retval = rtl8xxxu_get_free_sec_cam(hw);
>>> + if (retval < 0)
>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>
>>> - retval = rtl8xxxu_get_free_sec_cam(hw);
>>> - if (retval < 0)
>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> -
>>> - key->hw_key_idx = retval;
>>> + key->hw_key_idx = retval;
>>> + } else {
>>> + key->hw_key_idx = key->keyidx;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP && !(key->flags & IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_PAIRWISE))
>>> rtlvif->hw_key_idx = key->hw_key_idx;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
>>> index 4b05dba22e67..188f4bbe99cd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
>>> @@ -1788,6 +1788,7 @@ struct rtl8xxxu_cfo_tracking {
>>> #define RTL8XXXU_BC_MC_MACID 0
>>> #define RTL8XXXU_BC_MC_MACID1 1
>>> #define RTL8XXXU_MAX_SEC_CAM_NUM 64
>>> +#define RTL8XXXU_SEC_DEFAULT_KEY_NUM 4
>>>
>>> struct rtl8xxxu_priv {
>>> struct ieee80211_hw *hw;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-22 10:14 [PATCH v3 00/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Add concurrent mode for 8188f Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: remove assignment of priv->vif in rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed() Martin Kaistra
2024-01-10 14:54 ` Kalle Valo
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: prepare supporting two virtual interfaces Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support setting linktype for both interfaces Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: 8188e: convert usage of priv->vif to priv->vifs[0] Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support setting mac address register for both interfaces Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: extend wifi connected check to " Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: extend check for matching bssid " Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: don't parse CFO, if both interfaces are connected in STA mode Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support setting bssid register for multiple interfaces Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support multiple interfaces in set_aifs() Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support multiple interfaces in update_beacon_work_callback() Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support multiple interfaces in configure_filter() Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support multiple interfaces in watchdog_callback() Martin Kaistra
[not found] ` <CAKFoaw3gz+kQMJJUEdDFvOCxQwqYZ0ijTNT2Z-YHiwC_Rv6puw@mail.gmail.com>
2023-12-25 5:22 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2024-01-08 9:42 ` Martin Kaistra
2024-01-09 2:55 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support multiple interfaces in {add,remove}_interface() Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support multiple interfaces in bss_info_changed() Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: support multiple interface in start_ap() Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: add macids for STA mode Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: remove obsolete priv->vif Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: add hw crypto support for AP mode Martin Kaistra
2026-02-21 22:09 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-02-23 2:26 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-02-24 15:43 ` Martin Kaistra
2026-02-25 2:28 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-10 23:32 ` Bitterblue Smith [this message]
2026-03-11 2:38 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 22:16 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-03-10 23:33 ` Bitterblue Smith
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: make supporting AP mode only on port 0 transparent Martin Kaistra
2023-12-22 10:14 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: declare concurrent mode support for 8188f Martin Kaistra
2024-01-11 16:36 ` Zenm Chen
2024-01-12 0:33 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2024-01-12 4:51 ` Zenm Chen
[not found] ` <CAKFoaw3TVZmp3LEcy4Oo1ZBy_vvOxivuvmdD+TT+Ou4Zy19cJA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-12-25 5:32 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Add concurrent mode " Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61d5c08b-d924-42ad-8a56-ba3ddb970297@gmail.com \
--to=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.kaistra@linutronix.de \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox