public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
	<vasanthakumar.thiagarajan@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	jjohnson@kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
	Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: baochen.qiang@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] wifi: ath11k: move .max_tx_ring to struct ath11k_hw_hal_params
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 22:43:56 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6267675.44csPzL39Z@nukework.gtech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89a61ef1-3e83-4303-ba04-cf5c5a4aae56@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Wednesday, January 14, 2026 3:59:09 PM CST Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 1/14/2026 1:29 PM, Alex G. wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 14, 2026 11:24:19 AM CST Jeff Johnson wrote:
> >> On 1/12/2026 11:00 PM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> >>> On 12/28/2025 8:44 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> >>>> ".max_tx_ring" is an upper bounds to indexing ".tcl2wbm_rbm_map". It
> >>>> is initialized in, core.c, a different file than the array. This
> >>>> spaghetti-like relation is fragile and not obvious. Accidentally
> >>>> setting ".max_tx_ring" too high leads to a hard to track out-of-
> >>>> bounds access and memory corruption.
> >>>> 
> >>>> There is a small ambiguity on the meaning of "max_tx_ring":
> >>>>   - The highest ring, max=3 implies there are 4 rings (0, 1, 2, 3)
> >>>>   - The highest number to use for array indexing (there are 3 rings)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Clarify this dependency by moving ".max_tx_ring" adjacent to the array
> >>>> ".tcl2wbm_rbm_map", and name it "num_tx_rings". Use ARRAY_SIZE()
> >>>> instead of #defines to initialize the length field.
> >>>> 
> >>>> The ath11k_hw_hal_params_qca6390 uses fewer num_tx_rings than its map,
> >>>> so use a constant to express the correct value. Add a static_assert()
> >>>> to fail compilation if the constant is accidentally set too high.
> >>> 
> >>> Text related to static_assert to be removed accordingly.
> > 
> > Hi Jeff,
> > 
> >> I removed the last sentence in 'pending', please check:
> >> 
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ath/ath.git/commit/?h=pen
> >> din g&id=26bb149b5e011b0f73f7b74421589cbd38e3304b
> > 
> > Re-reading the commit message, I think it makes sense to also remove the
> > sentence "The ath11k_hw_hal_params_qca6390 uses fewer num_tx_rings than
> > its
> > map, so use a constant to express the correct value.". Do you think it's
> > worth submitting a v4 with this minor change?
> > 
> > Alex
> 
> No need to submit a v4. I can make that change in 'pending'

Thank you!

> /jeff





  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-15  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-28 15:14 [PATCH v3] wifi: ath11k: move .max_tx_ring to struct ath11k_hw_hal_params Alexandru Gagniuc
2025-12-29  3:14 ` Baochen Qiang
2026-01-13  7:00 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2026-01-14 17:24   ` Jeff Johnson
2026-01-14 21:29     ` Alex G.
2026-01-14 21:59       ` Jeff Johnson
2026-01-15  4:43         ` Alex G. [this message]
2026-01-16  1:26 ` Jeff Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6267675.44csPzL39Z@nukework.gtech \
    --to=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=baochen.qiang@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vasanthakumar.thiagarajan@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox