From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:38684 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932699Ab0CLWWy (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:22:54 -0500 To: Pavel Roskin Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Weird wireless/wpa_supplicant screw-up. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:19:41 EST." <1268432381.3596.12.camel@mj> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <7197.1268086939@localhost> <1268392481.4828.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <5220.1268430568@localhost> <1268432381.3596.12.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1268432548_4034P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:22:28 -0500 Message-ID: <6480.1268432548@localhost> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --==_Exmh_1268432548_4034P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:19:41 EST, Pavel Roskin said: > On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 16:49 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > > So the root cause has something to do with params[idx].cipher being unset. > > Sorry if it's obvious, but please make sure you don't have another > wpa_supplicant running and there is no other software that tries to > control the interface. > > If you have NetworkManager, the device in question should be unmanaged. No NetworkManager here, so that shoots that theory. There's just a wpa_supplicant running and nothing else managing the interface. --==_Exmh_1268432548_4034P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFLmr6kcC3lWbTT17ARArSpAJ9ILKTYo1dDnrZ7aXh8+vtzKv+aAACdEEpU gcfC+vIutc//OYBgAlp1+UM= =WK6/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1268432548_4034P--