linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vnaralas@codeaurora.org
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Bhagavathi Perumal S <bperumal@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cfg80211: Add tx ack signal attribute in sta info
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:57:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65e392b36ecf5b3161be954e974c4c0a@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516623728.2508.4.camel@sipsolutions.net>

On 2018-01-22 17:52, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 18:10 +0530, Venkateswara Naralasetty wrote:
>> From: Bhagavathi Perumal S <bperumal@codeaurora.org>
>> 
>> This patch provides support for users to get ack signal
>> strength of last transmitted by introducing new attribute
>> 'NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL'.
> 
> No real objection to the patch itself, but you should say *why* you
> need this, and I'm not really sure I see much point in having the
> signal strength of the very last ACK frame?
If user wants to get instant RSSI for the station which is ideal for 
long time, user can sent null frame and get RSSI form the ack of that 
null frame.

> 
> At least provide reasoning so other drivers can decide whether to
> implement it or not.
> 
>> + * @NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL: signal strength of the last ACK 
>> frame(u8, dBm)
> 
> more like s8, really.

I have taken reference from 'NL80211_STA_INFO_SIGNAL_AVG'.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-24 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-18 12:40 [PATCH 1/2] cfg80211: Add tx ack signal attribute in sta info Venkateswara Naralasetty
2018-01-22 12:22 ` Johannes Berg
2018-01-24 11:27   ` vnaralas [this message]
2018-01-30  7:54     ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65e392b36ecf5b3161be954e974c4c0a@codeaurora.org \
    --to=vnaralas@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bperumal@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).