From: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
To: "Michał Kazior" <kazikcz@gmail.com>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
"Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi chips
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:39:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6715f59dc8e834cddd701c6f9ee9f344@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABvG-CVwRyeD5=0HqTyNQPVOV1iPtAT_GJQSmSH4=DdDca6dYw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2018-07-26 21:02, Michał Kazior wrote:
> On 26 July 2018 at 13:45, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
>> Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> Upstream kernel has an interface to help adjust sk_pacing_shift to
>>> help
>>> improve TCP UL throughput.
>>> The sk_pacing_shift is 8 in mac80211, this is based on test with 11N
>>> WiFi chips with ath9k. For QCA6174/QCA9377 PCI 11AC chips, the 11AC
>>> VHT80 TCP UL throughput testing result shows 6 is the optimal.
>>> Overwrite the sk_pacing_shift to 6 in ath10k driver.
>>
>> When I tested this, a pacing shift of 8 was quite close to optimal as
>> well for ath10k. Why are you getting different results?
>>
>>> Tested with QCA6174 PCI with firmware
>>> WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00109-QCARMSWPZ-1, but this will also affect QCA9377
>>> PCI.
>>> It's not a regression with new firmware releases.
>>>
>>> There have 2 test result of different settings:
>>>
>>> ARM CPU based device with QCA6174A PCI with different
>>> sk_pacing_shift:
>
> Different firmware releases have different tx buffering
> characteristics. In some 10.2 firmware running on QCA9888 you can have
> up to 5ms of delayed aggregation. Ideally sk_pacing_shift should be
> adjusted per firmware release. Maybe this should become part of the
> ath10k firmware wrapping "fw features" stuff?
>
recently we do not want to do like this since no test data for each
firmware.
>
> Michał
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-27 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 7:21 [PATCH 0/2] Change sk_pacing_shift in ieee80211_hw for best tx throughput Wen Gong
2018-07-26 7:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: Save sk_pacing_shift to ieee80211_hw Wen Gong
2018-07-26 14:52 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-27 8:35 ` Wen Gong
2018-07-27 9:30 ` Kalle Valo
2018-07-26 7:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi chips Wen Gong
2018-07-26 11:45 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-07-26 13:02 ` Michał Kazior
2018-07-27 9:39 ` Wen Gong [this message]
2018-07-27 12:33 ` Michał Kazior
2018-07-27 9:29 ` Wen Gong
2018-07-27 20:06 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-26 7:16 [PATCH 0/2] Change sk_pacing_shift in ieee80211_hw for best tx throughput Wen Gong
2018-07-26 7:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi chips Wen Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6715f59dc8e834cddd701c6f9ee9f344@codeaurora.org \
--to=wgong@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kazikcz@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).