Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] wifi: ath12k: Use pci_{enable/disable}_link_state() APIs to enable/disable ASPM states

["Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2025, Jeff Johnson wrote:

> On 8/25/2025 10:44 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >  # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause-Clear
> >  config ATH12K
> >  	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies Wi-Fi 7 support (ath12k)"
> > -	depends on MAC80211 && HAS_DMA && PCI
> > +	depends on MAC80211 && HAS_DMA && PCI && PCIEASPM
> 
> As you point out in patch 1/8, PCIEASPM is protected by EXPERT.
> 
> Won't this prevent the driver from being built (or even showing up in
> menuconfig) if EXPERT is not enabled?

It doesn't work that way, PCIEASPM defaults to y:

$ sed -i -e 's|CONFIG_PCIEASPM=y|CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n|g' .config && make oldconfig && grep -e 'CONFIG_EXPERT ' -e 'CONFIG_PCIEASPM=' .config
#
# configuration written to .config
#
# CONFIG_EXPERT is not set
CONFIG_PCIEASPM=y

> Should we consider having a separate CONFIG item that is used to protect just
> the PCI ASPM interfaces? And then we could split out the ath12k_pci_aspm
> functions into a separate file that is conditionally built based upon that
> config item?
> 
> Or am I too paranoid since everyone enables EXPERT?

One just cannot control PCIEASPM value if EXPERT is not set. ASPM is 
expected to be enabled, or "experts" get to keep the pieces.

-- 
 i.