From: Karthikeyan Periyasamy <periyasa@codeaurora.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] ath10k: Add QCA vendor command/attr support to filterneighbor BSS frames
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:19:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7212e3a5157ab61d10b8d7184e290593@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69a99a7f1b2b7434b70c5c6df1812952928547cc.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On 2019-01-26 02:19, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> Sure. I guess my question was intended more along the lines of "how
> much
> CPU impact would you be able to live with?" :-)
As much as no CPU impact.
> At the same time, what happens today actually? Do all frames from non-
> associated clients come up to the host? If so, is this not a problem
> for
> all APs, not just ath10k?
>
Today, without this patch. No frames from non-associated clients come up
to the host in AP mode.
> And if they don't come up, what feature requires this? Sorry for the
> vague questions, but I'm not really sure what this is all about. If
> there's a need for these frames, wouldn't we need a generic way of
> enabling receiving them, and perhaps even signalling hostapd with them?
Steering application use this feature in their logical part of client
steering.
This feature allow an application to configure filtering rules to
capture from
stations that are active on the operating channel but not associated to
this AP.
It also allow to get the statistics information of the configured non
associated stations.
Ath10k driver use HW filter to capture other BSS frames and drop these
packets
after collecting statistics information of configured non associated
stations.
QCA vendor command/attr details:
https://w1.fi/cgit/hostap/commit/?id=6b21df0bb7a261ef890a02d1fef95ffa5ff54cfc
> Also, what are the statistics and what do you intend to use them for?
In this patch, we are providing the below information as a statistics of
non associated stations.
- MAC address
- Last received signal strength
- Time stamp of the last received signal strength
Thanks,
Karthikeyan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-28 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-05 11:51 [RFC 0/2] ath10k: Add QCA vendor command/attr support to filter neighbor BSS frames Karthikeyan Periyasamy
2018-07-05 11:51 ` [RFC 1/2] ath10k: add wmi interface for vdev_set_neighbor_rx_param Karthikeyan Periyasamy
2018-07-05 11:51 ` [RFC 2/2] ath10k: Add QCA vendor command/attr support to filter neighbor BSS frames Karthikeyan Periyasamy
2018-10-05 6:00 ` [RFC 2/2] ath10k: Add QCA vendor command/attr support to filterneighbor " Kalle Valo
[not found] ` <20181005060031.BA1EB60BF4@smtp.codeaurora.org>
2018-10-18 8:29 ` Johannes Berg
2018-11-20 2:40 ` Karthikeyan Periyasamy
2019-01-25 20:49 ` Johannes Berg
2019-01-28 4:49 ` Karthikeyan Periyasamy [this message]
2019-02-15 12:37 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7212e3a5157ab61d10b8d7184e290593@codeaurora.org \
--to=periyasa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).