From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
"wnhuang@chromium.com" <wnhuang@chromium.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mwifiex: parse chip specific gpio from device tree
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:19:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73667407.d5gJFSzxQK@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1be9cc31466a49d2b6673e09795c9497@SC-EXCH04.marvell.com>
On Tuesday 09 February 2016 14:03:19 Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:11:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 08 February 2016 02:15:27 Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> > > > if (adapter->dt_node) {
> > > > + if (of_property_read_u32(adapter->dt_node,
> > > > + "mwifiex,chip-
> > gpio",
> > > > + &data) == 0) {
> > > > + mwifiex_dbg(adapter, INFO,
> > > > + "chip_gpio = 0x%x\n",
> > data);
> > > > + adapter->hs_cfg.gpio = data;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > >
> > >
> > > Please use the GPIO DT binding. Reading a number from DT is not a
> > > proper way to get a GPIO number, as you may have more than one GPIO
> > > controller in a system and it is not obvious to which controller this
> > > number belongs, or if you need to specify things like polarity.
> >
> > My read of this is it is not the host SOC gpio, but the WiFi device's
> > GPIO number. The host GPIO is defined in patch 3. We could still use the
> > GPIO binding to describe it doing something like "marvell,<wifi gpio pin
> > name>-gpios". Then the assignment is based on the property name.
I see.
> Yes. This is not host SOC gpio. It's wifi chip's gpio number.
> We will use GPIO binding for this in updated version.
No, if it doesn't refer to a number that is interpreted by the host
but is used internally in the device, then leave it as it is, as Rob
suggested.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-09 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 10:15 [PATCH v3 1/3] mwifiex: register platform specific driver Amitkumar Karwar
2016-02-08 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mwifiex: parse chip specific gpio from device tree Amitkumar Karwar
2016-02-08 12:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 21:47 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-09 14:03 ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-02-09 14:19 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-02-09 14:26 ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-02-08 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mwifiex: parse host wakeup configuration " Amitkumar Karwar
2016-02-08 12:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09 13:46 ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-02-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mwifiex: register platform specific driver Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09 13:44 ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-02-09 14:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09 14:27 ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-02-08 21:56 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-09 14:00 ` Amitkumar Karwar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73667407.d5gJFSzxQK@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akarwar@marvell.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=huxm@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishants@marvell.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wnhuang@chromium.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).