From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: LB F <goainwo@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [BUG] wifi: rtw88: Hard system freeze on RTL8821CE when power_save is enabled (LPS/ASPM conflict)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 02:50:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74569e958a5d4f3b9c857c1ecc8ec274@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALdGYqSq416qqqZ7t+wG5fir9NWfi3578+brdaj05q-42Gj14w@mail.gmail.com>
LB F <goainwo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
> > I'd adopt your suggestion (dynamic LPS_DEEP_MODE_NONE) if the test
> > is positive.
>
> Hi Ping-Ke,
>
> Following your suggestion, I performed an additional experiment to
> validate the dynamic LPS_DEEP_MODE_NONE idea. Please treat this
> purely as a field test report -- I am not a kernel developer, and the
> implementation below is certainly not upstream-quality. I am sharing
> it only in the hope that it helps you design a proper solution.
>
> What I did:
>
> I extended your DMI quirk in pci.c with an additional capability flag
> for LPS Deep mode. The only file touched was pci.c (your patch) --
> main.c was left completely unmodified.
>
> The changes to your patch are as follows:
>
> /* 1. Extended the capabilities enum */
> enum rtw88_quirk_dis_pci_caps {
> QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM,
> QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_LPS_DEEP, /* test addition */
> };
>
> /* 2. Extended disable_pci_caps() callback */
> static int disable_pci_caps(const struct dmi_system_id *dmi)
> {
> uintptr_t dis_caps = (uintptr_t)dmi->driver_data;
>
> if (dis_caps & BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM))
> rtw_pci_disable_aspm = true;
>
> if (dis_caps & BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_LPS_DEEP))
> rtw_disable_lps_deep_mode = true;
>
> return 1;
> }
>
> /* 3. Both flags set for the HP P3S95EA#ACB entry */
> .driver_data = (void *)(BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM) |
> BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_LPS_DEEP)),
>
> I am aware that setting rtw_disable_lps_deep_mode from pci.c is
> architecturally impure -- it is a global flag that would affect all
> rtw88 devices in a hypothetical multi-adapter system. A proper
> per-device solution (e.g. a flag inside struct rtw_dev set during
> probe) would be cleaner. I simply used the existing global as the
> most straightforward way to validate the concept.
>
> Verification:
>
> Confirmed no rtw88-related entries exist in /etc/modprobe.d/,
> /lib/modprobe.d/, or /run/modprobe.d/, ruling out any external
> parameter injection.
>
> After loading the patched modules, the following was confirmed via
> sysfs:
>
> /sys/module/rtw88_core/parameters/disable_lps_deep_mode = Y
> /sys/module/rtw88_pci/parameters/disable_aspm = Y
>
> This confirms the DMI quirk is the sole source of both values.
>
> Results (10-minute idle observation, battery power, wifi.powersave=3):
>
> With your ASPM patch alone (LPS Deep still active):
> - periodic "failed to send h2c command" bursts observed
> - occasional WiFi throughput drops and Bluetooth audio stuttering
>
> With ASPM patch + LPS Deep disabled via the quirk:
> - h2c=0, lps=0 across the entire observation window
> - WiFi throughput stable, Bluetooth audio uninterrupted
>
> The result confirms that disabling LPS Deep Mode in addition to ASPM
> completely eliminates the remaining firmware timeout loop on this
> platform.
>
> I hope this experiment is useful as a data point. Please feel free to
> discard the implementation and design a proper solution -- I am ready
> to test any updated patch you send.
Thanks for your analysis of TX/RX paths, and the changes above and
verifications. :)
I'd update the patch as your proposal and send a patch. For suggestions of
TX/RX paths, I only read them a little bit, and I will study them entirely
when I have more free time.
Ping-Ke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 21:48 [BUG] wifi: rtw88: Hard system freeze on RTL8821CE when power_save is enabled (LPS/ASPM conflict) LB F
2026-03-10 2:02 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-10 11:01 ` LB F
2026-03-10 15:12 ` LB F
2026-03-11 2:20 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 2:15 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 2:22 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 11:00 ` LB F
2026-03-11 15:22 ` LB F
2026-03-12 1:56 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-12 21:42 ` LB F
2026-03-13 0:03 ` LB F
2026-03-13 0:29 ` LB F
2026-03-14 10:52 ` LB F
2026-03-14 12:39 ` LB F
2026-03-15 0:24 ` LB F
2026-03-16 2:55 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-16 20:27 ` LB F
2026-03-17 1:28 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-18 0:00 ` LB F
2026-03-18 0:58 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-18 23:55 ` LB F
2026-03-19 0:22 ` LB F
2026-03-19 0:49 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-19 1:24 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-19 23:58 ` LB F
2026-03-20 0:41 ` LB F
2026-03-20 1:00 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-20 1:19 ` LB F
2026-03-20 2:02 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-21 12:07 ` LB F
2026-03-23 2:01 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-25 20:38 ` LB F
2026-03-16 2:50 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74569e958a5d4f3b9c857c1ecc8ec274@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=goainwo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox