From: nick@nhthomas.freeserve.co.uk
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Wifi signal level differences
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:51:44 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7566504.38231368021104217.JavaMail.www@wwinf3714> (raw)
Hi,
I have an Atheros ath6kl_usb based wifi dongle.
I am using it with an embedded project.
The driver code can be built for either X86 or sh4 hardware - so I can also use the same USB wifi dongle on my Fedora 12 Linux PC or plugged in to the embedded device.
It's working fine in both situations.
But, I notice that the signal level reported in /proc/net/wireless is slightly different between the two units.
Note, I am using the same physical Atheros wifi dongle, and moving it from one device to the other to this test.
I notice that when using the X86 PC I see a signal level of -61, which is marginally better than the -66 I see in the embedded device.
I know that this isn't an exact science - but using a short USB extension lead I can orientate the wifi dongle to be in the same place and orientation when plugged in to either device.
So, I would expect the wifi signal strength to be reported the same !?
I know there are many differences between my Fedora 12 PC, and the embedded STLinux project - not least that the driver is compiled using different compilers.
But, I was wondering what else could explain the difference in signal levels between the two?
Also, which part of the driver code is responsible for reading/calculating the signal level value?
Regards
Nick
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-08 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-08 13:51 nick [this message]
2013-05-08 14:29 ` Wifi signal level differences Dan Williams
2013-05-08 14:42 ` nick
2013-05-15 13:19 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7566504.38231368021104217.JavaMail.www@wwinf3714 \
--to=nick@nhthomas.freeserve.co.uk \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).