From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] wifi: rtw88: usb: Further limit the TX aggregation
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:28:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <795aca2a59a34b86a0cb493d8a12ef68@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb46ea35-7e59-4742-9c1f-01ceeaad36fb@gmail.com>
Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently the number of frames sent to the chip in a single USB Request
> Block is limited only by the size of the TX buffer, which is 20 KiB.
> Testing reveals that as many as 13 frames get aggregated. This is more
> than what any of the chips would like to receive. RTL8822CU, RTL8822BU,
> and RTL8821CU want at most 3 frames, and RTL8723DU wants only 1 frame
> per URB.
>
> RTL8723DU in particular reliably malfunctions during a speed test if it
> receives more than 1 frame per URB. All traffic seems to stop. Pinging
> the AP no longer works.
>
> Fix this problem by limiting the number of frames sent to the chip in a
> single URB according to what each chip likes.
>
> Also configure RTL8822CU, RTL8822BU, and RTL8821CU to expect 3 frames
> per URB.
>
> RTL8703B may or may not be found in USB devices. Declare that it wants
> only 1 frame per URB, just in case.
>
> Tested with RTL8723DU and RTL8811CU.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-17 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-16 19:27 [PATCH v3] wifi: rtw88: usb: Further limit the TX aggregation Bitterblue Smith
2024-06-17 1:28 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2024-06-21 12:45 ` Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=795aca2a59a34b86a0cb493d8a12ef68@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
--cc=sha@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox