Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rameshkumar Sundaram <rameshkumar.sundaram@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Willmar Knikker <willmar@met-dubbel-l.nl>,
	jjohnson@kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: fix use after free in ath11k_dp_rx_msdu_coalesce.
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 22:08:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a7d32f8-78e9-48a2-8914-0a7864345d25@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d3c5eae-233a-4c31-b64e-70f0afe74da6@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 5/5/2026 8:38 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 5/5/2026 7:30 AM, Willmar Knikker wrote:
>> In ath11k_dp_rx_msdu_coalesce the loop uses ->is_continuation after
>> the dev_kfree_skb_any. This can cause a use after free kfence.
>>
>> Move the use after the dev_kfree_skb_any after use of ->is_continuation
>> inline with the while in the while loop above this one.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Willmar Knikker <willmar@met-dubbel-l.nl>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 7 ++++---
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
>> index fe79109adc70..02bd9787d6b4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
>> @@ -1825,11 +1825,12 @@ static int ath11k_dp_rx_msdu_coalesce(struct ath11k *ar,
>>   		skb_pull(skb, hal_rx_desc_sz);
>>   		skb_copy_from_linear_data(skb, skb_put(first, buf_len),
>>   					  buf_len);
>> -		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>> -
>>   		rem_len -= buf_len;
>> -		if (!rxcb->is_continuation)
>> +		if (!rxcb->is_continuation) {
>> +			dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>>   			break;
>> +		}
>> +		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> 
> rather than repeating code imo it would be "better" to cache the flag before
> freeing and then test the cached flag.
> 
> however as you note this proposed logic matches the logic already present in
> the "Free up all buffers of the MSDU" portion of the function, so from that
> perspective the proposal is consistent with that logic.
> 
> let's see if anyone else has an opinion...


IMO a cached flag is a little easier to read and harder to regress.

Also please add a Fixes tag. This appears to go back to the initial 
ath11k commit.

Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")


--
Ramesh

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-05 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-05 14:30 [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: fix use after free in ath11k_dp_rx_msdu_coalesce Willmar Knikker
2026-05-05 15:08 ` Jeff Johnson
2026-05-05 16:38   ` Rameshkumar Sundaram [this message]
2026-05-05 16:53   ` Willmar Knikker
2026-05-12  2:55   ` Baochen Qiang
2026-05-05 15:13 ` Jeff Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7a7d32f8-78e9-48a2-8914-0a7864345d25@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=rameshkumar.sundaram@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willmar@met-dubbel-l.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox