Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt-binding: net: wireless: add bcm43430-fmac

[Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>]

On 04-09-17 16:42, Antony Antony wrote:
> Hi Arend,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:30:59PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>
>>>> Actually the Broadcom wifi chips themselves are discoverable. So once the
>>>> driver has access to the register space of the device it can determine the
>>>> actual chip, its revision, and exactly what cores (and their revision) are
>>>> present in the chip. Hence there is a single compatible string as there is
>>>> no need to convey the same information through device tree data.
>>>
>>> In my expereince this how it seems to work.
>>>
>>> I jsut discovered s/brcm,bcm4329-fmac/brcm/ can load the broadcom driver.
>>>
>>> brcmf: wifi@1 {
>>> 	reg = <1>;
>>> 	compatible = "brcm";
>>> };
>>>
>>> This looks better to me. Maxime, Would this work?
>>
>> I have no idea what you are saying here. To what exactly do you apply that
>> substitute. In brcmfmac I have:
> 
> Thanks for pointing me to the relevent code. I was asking about DT support I
> submitted.
> 
>>
>>          if (!np || bus_type != BRCMF_BUSTYPE_SDIO ||
>>              !of_device_is_compatible(np, "brcm,bcm4329-fmac"))
>>                  return;
>>
>> In my perception using "brcm" goes against DT compatible naming convention.
> 
> It seems the driver has a special place holder, bcm4329-fmac.
> I am still wondering what is acceptable in the DT.
> 
> compatible = ""brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> or
> compatible = "brcm";
> 
> The last one does not generate any warnings.

Ok. So what warning do you get when using "brcm,bcm4329-fmac"? Or did 
you really try ""brcm,bcm4329-fmac" as mentioned above?

Regards,
Arend