From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 391B5136351; Mon, 7 Sep 2026 00:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788742418; cv=none; b=a0F0+kKB5UuMNWAu3JoxhFGKWfexB0zcZ0TEyD0jT660Al64vz/7gcKZ7JtgNLYDmBIutKeocysTbI/9ZkkHgK+S9gzXmW+i6e2KXxf0S8Ahux4dtlAC2oOaGhbzGvUhkUMXhN6sr/UcrtEGC/EPKyLrg7KbmU2dagvRe7P76co= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788742418; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8oerNDadBeL5/DMlpJ6zVKmqUvuHWphCdDja55UIutY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=mJ1A+EyUjNkX/bz2KyId8wxZl396SmyIekFOBcgrL1dqRvK6sAl3Awcsg0eBtazSKQz9N20qgWphMnxXNCrh/WBLz9Uwcx5P18UagtsZzceoLoxaOmdnM5TvFDhIU+xqaAwY7i11oPZ4ZEn8iUmnarswQ6OlC5yZREhFUUS1ECc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.b=VjqAjtZA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.b="VjqAjtZA" X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.80 with qID 6870rW3x92353040, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=realtek.com; s=dkim; t=1788742412; bh=VXNvg6DFW62+TDnBK7kaCLKyc1Lj68wdQzE/9+J7o6E=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=VjqAjtZACeIJVZ4VeRQVK0NIRG7agc735voKhdvTfFvwRlTnAKRAu4gdln8Gu/E0I WmrPX6qjxmg9L5b+l32c3EPOFj/578x7+8PigR8x4JVzLqXDR+T1xrY1Ibe8edHA0A K50eSrZvw0nePny01eXM1TEDQr6vQLLQTbA5TjNb1FmxwDo0GEayPf8W2gCxKMJtBi 10WWdRoUYPzE9K1bAceVTj6HOUCmyab5chfCexQLKXIs68bQT7fhkokIQY3UJjsmWy nLGrseQ+gr3Ry/z9gRQyD+NEaqX6Ivm826Uq09iU6yyQdYnfAwkYTHUHPg/3TquJfH UX9Ur+jO1jp8Q== Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtkexhmbs03.realtek.com.tw[10.21.1.53]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/3.29/5.94) with ESMTPS id 6870rW3x92353040 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 7 Sep 2026 08:53:32 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.56) by RTKEXHMBS03.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.43; Mon, 7 Sep 2026 08:53:33 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([::1]) by RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::126f:59ad:658:674d%10]) with mapi id 15.02.2562.043; Mon, 7 Sep 2026 08:53:33 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: Maxim Skokov CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: fix typos in comments, debug messages and struct field Thread-Topic: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: fix typos in comments, debug messages and struct field Thread-Index: AQHdPLxoeqCUhqVOYE+KCJqv7rQpLLbCTFvg Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 00:53:33 +0000 Message-ID: <8094bfc474e34b2f826b9487e49bd601@realtek.com> References: <20260904222548.19732-1-skokovmaksimevg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20260904222548.19732-1-skokovmaksimevg@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW Content-Language: zh-TW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Maxim Skokov wrote: > Correct several misspellings found by codespell: >=20 > moniter -> monitor (struct rtw89_btc_wl_role_info_bpos field) > serach -> search (comment) > Unsupport -> Unsupported (error message) > nofity -> notify (comment) > updat -> update (debug message) > lagacy -> legacy (comment) >=20 > The renamed struct field has no users, so no further changes are > needed. No functional changes. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Maxim Skokov Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih > --- >=20 > Notes: > Found with codespell. Patch prepared with AI assistance; all changes = reviewed by me. Add a tag like Assisted-by: LLM codespell ? Just reply this mail, no need to resend v2.=20