From: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Hin-Tak Leung <hintak.leung@gmail.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] rtl8187: Implement rfkill support
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:33:39 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <850984.89698.qm@web23108.mail.ird.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251277063.10667.10.camel@johannes.local>
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 03:43 +0100,
> Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>
> > The rfkill event hard just goes 1 and 0 whenever I
> slide the switch,
> > regardless of what NM does . e.g. NM set to disable
> networking has no
> > effect on the 1/0 switch (it happens just depending on
> the slide
> > switch and nothing else), and nothing changes when NM
> noticed
> > rfkill'ed if down & decided to if'up and
> reassociate.
>
> Right, I just wanted to make sure the switch could be
> correctly read
> while the interface is down.
>
> > Basically the rfkill event state just depends on the
> slide switch,
> > regardless of NM (if it is set to enable wireless
> networking, it just
> > if up the device again; if it is set to disable, it
> just stayed
> > disable & the device stay down, but the event
> state continues to
> > respond to the slide switch).
>
> Ok. But this isn't making a lot of sense to me, since
> cfg80211 should
> refuse to UP the device when it's rfkilled.
>
> Or wait ... are you using compat-wireless?
Yes, I am. I mentioned this and did wonder if the _backport/ part in /sys/class is important.
Hin-Tak
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-22 3:38 [RFC/RFT] rtl8187: Implement rfkill support Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2009-08-22 17:12 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-22 21:59 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-23 19:38 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-24 18:10 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2009-08-24 21:03 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-24 1:46 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-24 18:03 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2009-08-25 1:29 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-25 2:51 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-25 3:36 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-25 6:51 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-25 9:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 2:43 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-26 8:57 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 12:45 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-26 13:33 ` Hin-Tak Leung [this message]
2009-08-26 14:34 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 15:07 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-26 16:57 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2009-08-26 16:29 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-26 20:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-26 22:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-26 22:12 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 22:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-26 22:30 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 22:46 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=850984.89698.qm@web23108.mail.ird.yahoo.com \
--to=htl10@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=herton@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=hintak.leung@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).