From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name,
sean.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 wireless-drivers] mt76: mt7663u: fix memory leaks in mt7663u_probe
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:58:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rm7f8pt.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622144018.GA27892@localhost.localdomain> (Lorenzo Bianconi's message of "Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:40:18 +0200")
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com> writes:
>> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>> > Fix the two following memory leaks in mt7663u_probe:
>> > 1- if device power-own times out, remove ieee80211 hw device.
>> > 2- if mt76u queues allocation fails, remove pending urbs.
>>
>> One logical change per patch, please. If you have to create a list of
>> changes in the commit log that's a good sign that you need to split the
>> patch :)
>
> both of them are memory leaks in the error path of the same routine (mt7663u_probe()).
> Do I need to split them even in this case? If so I am fine with it.
> Do I need to send a v3?
Oh, I didn't notice that they were in the same function. So I guess this
sort of gray area and no need to send v3 because of this.
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-22 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-21 16:03 [PATCH v2 wireless-drivers] mt76: mt7663u: fix memory leaks in mt7663u_probe Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-22 14:20 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-22 14:40 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-22 14:58 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2020-06-22 15:03 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-23 8:43 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871rm7f8pt.fsf@codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).