From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ath10k: allow explicit MSI/MSI-X disabling
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:01:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871u24ofke.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385125518-13461-9-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> (Michal Kazior's message of "Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:05:18 +0100")
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> writes:
> This can be useful for testing and debugging.
>
> Two new ath10k_pci module options are now available:
>
> disable_msix - disable just MSI-X
> disable_msi - disable MSI (along with MSI-X)
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
This is useful but I think it's a bit too much to have two more options,
it would be simpler to have just one. Few quick ideas how to do this a
bit differently:
irq_mode: 0 = automatic, 2 = MSI, 1 = legacy
Here the problem is of course that we can't force use of MSI if the host
only supports legacy interrupts, but IMHO that's a minor nuisance and in
that case we should just enable legacy interrupts.
disable_msi: 0x1 = disable MSI-X, 0x2 = disable MSI
Basically this is just your booleans converted to a bitfield.
I vote for irq_mode because I think that's easier for the user to
understand. But I'm sure there is a better way to do this.
> + if (msix_supported && !ath10k_disable_msix && !ath10k_disable_msi) {
> + ar_pci->num_msi_intrs = MSI_NUM_REQUEST;
> + ret = pci_enable_msi_block(ar_pci->pdev, ar_pci->num_msi_intrs);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + return 0;
> + if (ret > 0)
> + pci_disable_msi(ar_pci->pdev);
> +
> + /* fall-through */
> + }
If we force some other irq mode than the default it would be good to
have an info print for that.
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-25 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 13:05 [PATCH 0/8] ath10k: pci fixes 2013-11-22 Michal Kazior
2013-11-22 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/8] ath10k: don't consume other's shared interrupts Michal Kazior
2013-11-24 13:59 ` Kalle Valo
2013-11-22 13:05 ` [PATCH 2/8] ath10k: split up pci irq code Michal Kazior
2013-11-22 13:05 ` [PATCH 3/8] ath10k: fix memory leak on hif_start failpath Michal Kazior
2013-11-22 13:05 ` [PATCH 4/8] ath10k: don't use interrupts for BMI Michal Kazior
2013-11-22 13:05 ` [PATCH 5/8] ath10k: defer irq registration until hif start() Michal Kazior
2013-11-22 13:05 ` [PATCH 6/8] ath10k: extract functions for legacy irq handling Michal Kazior
2013-11-22 13:05 ` [PATCH 7/8] ath10k: re-add support for early fw indication Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 12:20 ` Kalle Valo
2013-11-25 12:46 ` Michal Kazior
2013-11-22 13:05 ` [PATCH 8/8] ath10k: allow explicit MSI/MSI-X disabling Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 12:01 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2013-11-25 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] ath10k: pci fixes 2013-11-22 Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ath10k: don't consume other's shared interrupts Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ath10k: split up pci irq code Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ath10k: don't use interrupts for BMI Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ath10k: decouple ath10k_pci_start_ce() Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ath10k: defer irq registration until hif start() Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ath10k: extract functions for legacy irq handling Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ath10k: re-add support for early fw indication Michal Kazior
2013-11-25 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ath10k: allow explicit MSI/MSI-X disabling Michal Kazior
2013-11-27 14:47 ` Kalle Valo
2013-11-27 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] ath10k: pci fixes 2013-11-22 Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871u24ofke.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox