linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT 1/7] ath10k: remove DMA mapping wrappers
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:37:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8738jfz3a2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392629563-31046-2-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> (Michal Kazior's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:32:37 +0100")

Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> writes:

> There's no real benefit from using them. DMA-API
> already provides debugging. Some skbuffs are
> already mapped directly with DMA-API since wrapper
> arguments were insufficient and extending them
> would be pointless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>

[...]

> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> @@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@ static void ath10k_wmi_event_host_swba(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	struct wmi_bcn_info *bcn_info;
>  	struct ath10k_vif *arvif;
>  	struct sk_buff *bcn;
> -	int vdev_id = 0;
> +	int err, vdev_id = 0;

We use ret, res and err as names for the status variable. We should try
to unify this and use ret everywhere.

-- 
Kalle Valo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-19 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-17  9:32 [RFC/RFT 0/7] ath10k: performance improvements Michal Kazior
2014-02-17  9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 1/7] ath10k: remove DMA mapping wrappers Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 12:37   ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2014-02-17  9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 2/7] ath10k: remove is_aborted from skb_cb Michal Kazior
2014-02-17  9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 3/7] ath10k: replace send_head() with tx_sg() Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 12:48   ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-19 13:25     ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 14:18       ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-20  6:43         ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-24 11:46           ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-17  9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 4/7] ath10k: bypass htc for htt tx path Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 14:56   ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-17  9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 5/7] ath10k: batch htt tx/rx completions Michal Kazior
2014-02-19 15:10   ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-20 11:23     ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-24 11:49       ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-17  9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 6/7] ath10k: remove pci completion list Michal Kazior
2014-02-17  9:32 ` [RFC/RFT 7/7] ath10k: minimize coherent dma accesses Michal Kazior
2014-02-17 15:01 ` [RFC/RFT 0/7] ath10k: performance improvements Kalle Valo
2014-02-19 15:16 ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-26 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Michal Kazior
2014-02-26 11:34   ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ath10k: remove DMA mapping wrappers Michal Kazior
2014-02-26 11:34   ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ath10k: remove is_aborted from skb_cb Michal Kazior
2014-02-26 12:09   ` [PATCH v2 0/8] ath10k: performance improvements Michal Kazior
2014-02-27  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 " Michal Kazior
2014-02-27  7:19   ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ath10k: remove DMA mapping wrappers Michal Kazior
2014-02-27  7:19   ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ath10k: remove is_aborted from skb_cb Michal Kazior
2014-02-27  7:19   ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ath10k: replace send_head() with tx_sg() Michal Kazior
2014-02-27  7:19   ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ath10k: bypass htc for htt tx path Michal Kazior
2014-02-28  9:06     ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-28  9:15       ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-28  9:28         ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-28  9:54           ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-27  7:19   ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ath10k: batch htt tx/rx completions Michal Kazior
2014-02-28  9:00     ` Kalle Valo
2014-02-28  9:07       ` Michal Kazior
2014-02-27  7:19   ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ath10k: reduce htt tx/rx spinlock overhead Michal Kazior
2014-02-27  7:19   ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ath10k: remove pci completion list Michal Kazior
2014-02-27  7:19   ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ath10k: minimize coherent dma accesses Michal Kazior
2014-02-28 10:13   ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ath10k: performance improvements Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8738jfz3a2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).