From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: unify warning messages in mac.c
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:40:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761nv44nd.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQmQndikH5uPDwBpstp9KmcD3tmHSGP5NpEreYEOtRm0sw@mail.gmail.com> (Michal Kazior's message of "Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:23:24 +0100")
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> writes:
> On 3 March 2014 16:43, Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>> Currently there are different styles used for warning messages, unify them to
>> look similar.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
> This still seems inconsistent.
Sure. What I did here was that I just capitalised them messages and made
sure that return code is printed in format ": %d\n".
> I also don't like the capital letters (even for abbreviations) in
> these kind of messages, but that's just my OCD..
I'm fine with starting a lower case letter. For me most important is
that the messages follow the same style.
> I think we should agree on one of the two approaches:
>
> a) start with a verb:
>
> "failed to add peer %pM on vdev %i: %d"
> "failed to initialize dfs pattern detector"
> "timed out while waiting for scan completion"
>
> b) start with a noun:
>
> "peer %pM on vdev %i could not be added: %d"
> "dfs pattern detector could not initialize"
> "scan timed out"
>
> These are still mixed.
>
> We could probably also limit the set of verbs, e.g. replace "could
> not" with "failed to" as it's practically the same thing (assuming we
> pick (a)).
That's true. I would vote for option (a).
> But then again, feel free to ignore my OCD :-)
Hehe, I had to even google that :)
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 15:43 [PATCH] ath10k: unify warning messages in mac.c Kalle Valo
2014-03-03 16:23 ` Michal Kazior
2014-03-03 16:40 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2014-03-11 11:16 ` Kalle Valo
2014-03-11 17:37 ` Ben Greear
2014-03-11 17:46 ` Joe Perches
2014-03-11 17:56 ` Ben Greear
2014-03-11 18:08 ` Joe Perches
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-24 15:00 Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8761nv44nd.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).