From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.185]:19748 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751283AbZBVGjx (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:39:53 -0500 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f33so1276374fkf.5 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:39:51 -0800 (PST) To: Larry Finger Cc: Dan Williams , John Linville , Johannes Berg , wireless Subject: Re: Signal quality strange since commit 708c57cf1709fb95 References: <49A01922.1090106@lwfinger.net> <1235241867.3284.44.camel@localhost> <49A05E35.70904@lwfinger.net> From: Kalle Valo Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:39:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <49A05E35.70904@lwfinger.net> (Larry Finger's message of "Sat\, 21 Feb 2009 14\:04\:05 -0600") Message-ID: <8763j33rgq.fsf@litku.valot.fi> (sfid-20090222_074010_307862_EFC96D26) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Larry Finger writes: > I know how it works with drivers that implement their own ioctl > calls for the WEXT interface; however, the 3 that I mentioned all > use mac80211 and get their WEXT support through cfg80211. Yes, something is wrong now. I noticed the same problem (/70 in signal strength) when I was implementing rssi support for at76c50x-usb. -- Kalle Valo