From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>,
<franky.lin@broadcom.com>, <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcm80211: remove redundant condition check before debugfs_remove_recursive
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:30:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877ejg1hcd.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5BA391D4.20205@huawei.com> (zhong jiang's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:25:56 +0800")
zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> writes:
> On 2018/9/20 20:07, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>>> debugfs_remove_recursive has taken IS_ERR_OR_NULL into account. So just
>>> remove the condition check before debugfs_remove_recursive.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
>> It seems you already submitted an identical patch four days earlier:
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10593061/
>>
>> Why the duplicate? Please ALWAYS add a changelog and increase the version number:
>
> I am sorry for that. Maybe I send the patch earlier, but I remeber I
> should forget to cc to
> netdev@vger.kernel.org and LMLK. So I repost it. Plese ingore the current patch.
Even then please increase the version number and mention in the change
log why you sent a new version. Otherwise you will make maintainers
confused and wasting time with asking what has changed.
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-20 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 14:10 [PATCH] brcm80211: remove redundant condition check before debugfs_remove_recursive zhong jiang
2018-09-20 12:07 ` Kalle Valo
[not found] ` <20180920120709.5FE6960BF7@smtp.codeaurora.org>
2018-09-20 12:25 ` zhong jiang
2018-09-20 12:30 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2018-09-20 12:37 ` zhong jiang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-08 13:40 zhong jiang
2018-09-20 12:10 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877ejg1hcd.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
--cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).