From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D8A55C07 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710784487; cv=none; b=hhTeE9B6vedtW3xvb9/r9CBMLj19QJW3T3sHrWwJvQmX3lweJOwG1UA1ov3uMjHnFXnT3rrdzsdiDtX//YwZ1CGoHEiIYYJU4sWFPMl6CeaA0b5CGYtD8eotxUFcqGUV14Gl7/43FgAlMFdf10Hz33yJlagHYgd8A7PNbO3fBOQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710784487; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qepjLFBOtzZoOmQQb1bfwPWOL137DOQO8cSoa8pFgnU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rgDzlB1dElE44J+Qz6xyVXYIpQwLi1iZmUfb2XAof5Ck1goRUlsw7AjB1XBqyzX79lXJbmebNkLlt5iuXfSZ2oxNGj6oRF/hsmrIYz9v12psU9hietK+a+Vr9leYYN9u3n0Hom+xfKi2dQP+kGgNAVAaezP1DhufTJhlTsZevog= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nzUcX5p+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nzUcX5p+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D987EC433F1; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:54:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1710784486; bh=qepjLFBOtzZoOmQQb1bfwPWOL137DOQO8cSoa8pFgnU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=nzUcX5p+/rvDh513vLqNqZ9WBbrRWIIE0qI/66bHS5ahGZh3X8bIgMaxlQnKJqhbj IIC0G6QpTlbU8lIggbKq/jOUSmuWybnOZi//ScNw+q6Nk/83ecHLhRBvVfBTWRJ68z lM8wkS5DxhilM6okT9EmH8L6JUF+SlTbA0KNcb1z8PgvsYmnyPymVFZsIXLlWiOf1l egIeSEdp3FpP2mvQ1o70+muS2Vo4rlvjGJWjF5KQNiQzu5E8LJWZg81RY/se5WFrkT bHhJ0HOkqsdqx0KowWN/MZI+JKf0VTgRblVWwphXGpHKDoa7rIdqpu3mJA32+4Xf02 m4Mb1DdimTR+g== From: Kalle Valo To: Aloka Dixit Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz References: <20240314204651.11075-1-quic_alokad@quicinc.com> <87sf0nczca.fsf@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:54:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sf0nczca.fsf@kernel.org> (Kalle Valo's message of "Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:51:49 +0200") Message-ID: <878r2fctng.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Kalle Valo writes: > Aloka Dixit writes: > >> WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace >> peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data. >> >> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 >> >> Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz") >> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit > > What does this fix from user's point of view? Does it mean that 320 MHz > chanels were broken before and this commit fixes that? I can ammend the > commit message. And what about WCN7850? Does it work the same? -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches