linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Shashidhar Lakkavalli <slakkavalli@datto.com>,
	Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V3 1/2] mac80211: add hw 80211 encapsulation offloading support
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:28:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878swspmdu.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5647fa751aed450f09312c35f8d5becd47e26b66.camel@sipsolutions.net>

Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 11:50 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> [snip, you really should try that sometimes ;-)]
>
>> ieee80211_queue_skb() calls ieee80211_get_txq() which treats skb-
>> datalike it contains an 802.11 header. That is probably not the
>> intention here, is it?
>
> Indeed, that makes no sense.
>
>> I guess we could augment the TXQ stuctures to also handle 802.3 frames
>> (and introduce ieee80211_queue_skb_8023())? Or would it be better to
>> have a qdisc on 802.3-mode interfaces and push packets back to that? I
>> guess we'd still benefit from per-station queueing of packets even if
>> they are Ethernet frames, which would mean amending the TXQs would be
>> better?
>
> TXQs would be better, yes. We should do that.

Cool. Glad that we agree ;)

-Toke

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-02 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-01 13:14 [RFC V3 0/2] mac80211: add 802.11 encapsulation offloading John Crispin
2019-04-01 13:14 ` [RFC V3 1/2] mac80211: add hw 80211 encapsulation offloading support John Crispin
2019-04-02  9:31   ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-04-02 14:39     ` John Crispin
2019-04-02 16:33       ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-04-02  9:50   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-02 12:44     ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-02 13:28       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-04-02 14:37         ` John Crispin
2019-04-10  7:28     ` John Crispin
2019-04-10 10:16       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-08 19:28   ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-01 13:14 ` [RFC V3 2/2] ath10k: add tx hw 802.11 encapusaltion " John Crispin
2019-04-01 13:20   ` Ben Greear
2019-04-01 14:02   ` John Crispin
2019-04-02  9:27     ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-04-02 14:38       ` John Crispin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878swspmdu.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=slakkavalli@datto.com \
    --cc=vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).