From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] wifi: rtw88: Refactor looping in rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 05:32:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a0854a459549a5addfd39ab94669c1@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017080638.13074-1-pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com>
Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com> wrote:
> The previous implementation included an unnecessary else
> condition paired with a continue statement. Since a check
> is already performed to determine if the band is either
> 2G or 5G, the else condition will never be triggered.
> We can remove this check.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410171143.OnFlgIwK-lkp@intel.com/
no need this Closes link because of typo of v1. I will remove this during merging.
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Changed from using a pointer approach to a simpler if-else structure for clarity.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c
> index 37ef80c9091d..8b9f8f73c14c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c
> @@ -1470,10 +1470,8 @@ static void rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> rate = rates[i];
> if (band == PHY_BAND_2G)
> hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_2g[rfpath][rate] = offset;
> - else if (band == PHY_BAND_5G)
> - hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath][rate] = offset;
> else
> - continue;
> + hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath][rate] = offset;
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-18 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 8:06 [PATCH v2] wifi: rtw88: Refactor looping in rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate Mohammed Anees
2024-10-18 5:32 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2024-10-25 2:15 ` Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a0854a459549a5addfd39ab94669c1@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).