From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9A8C56202 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B5B2145D for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="TATWRzZx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730735AbgKZKEv (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 05:04:51 -0500 Received: from m42-4.mailgun.net ([69.72.42.4]:61753 "EHLO m42-4.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729690AbgKZKEu (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 05:04:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1606385090; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=64QOHkD7nZIcKZ/FzIeGhS5LW89JrFwlD6gBg9kc1gQ=; b=TATWRzZxWwEMOX91yK4t8ERxzXKlsyC2mq0ocMzj4hd7ZfywROkSk3V4M7Nn6YW0zPm+PcvL S4uVNMSIvS2txiOleoUuKLunlt9L9fCWfphjOs4EUKjxVp6K/RU6sKZzLxLdEdrOLkR3kBWq kr9rN9Kj281kfkyx1vsXGbGvSUY= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.42.4 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n04.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5fbf7dc122377520ee754377 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:04:49 GMT Sender: kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A3956C43460; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83156C433ED; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:04:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 83156C433ED Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Devin Bayer Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: ath11k with QCA6391 References: <87wnz3twvo.fsf@codeaurora.org> <5f3ee526-e96f-3c88-a17e-e7ebf9703ed1@doubly.so> <87d00uo85x.fsf@codeaurora.org> <48f37c07-ca63-7ba9-1518-a31681777b15@doubly.so> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:04:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <48f37c07-ca63-7ba9-1518-a31681777b15@doubly.so> (Devin Bayer's message of "Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:22:19 +0100") Message-ID: <87a6v4ph6q.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Devin Bayer writes: > On 03/11/2020 14.56, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Devin Bayer writes: >> >>> On 02/11/2020 19.51, Kalle Valo wrote: >>>> >>>> To my knowledge, from ath11k point of view, QCA6391 should look the same >>>> as QCA6390 but most likely the board file for QCA6391 is different. >>>> >>> [snip] >>> >>> They are different than those from your repo, but maybe I can use >>> bdwlan01.e04 as the board file. >> >> Yes, that's what I would also suggest to test first: take the firmware >> from ath11k-firmware.git and the board file from the vendor. > > I would like to report that with your latest qca6390-bringup branch my QCA6391 > card is working well with just the one MSI vector. I'm using the board file for > 6390 from the linux-firmware repo. > > Thanks for the fixes :) Great, thanks for the report. It's always helpful to know what is working or not working on the field. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches