From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7A1C001E0 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234288AbjHAOC3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:02:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56432 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234213AbjHAOCN (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:02:13 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B761F1704 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 07:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC9A615B8 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7FD7C433C8; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:02:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1690898531; bh=xN9WItc/524GYuL6CKLrjp85TZ7y8WHMjHcz9E9K7Hg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=hb6kDjaFUkJn3BRoVvETND5fOlsXOEE4Tn3u3+/97Oz0xQG3xNUB1Abq8wKZftwvX Mdyrnb70o4b7YqS54sVzOU68rnqiAtvH3yDxpT0eSgvQ27oscL0rhSySPjBatnt5en g7CL4//DhvNqjRAaS45761mAiDjkddmkIikNkIDs2F5uELcnP9J6P0wi0dxMob4XS7 9Ljfc3qEfmOm/IlryRL/UdQeYTaYSj+v4n7Ww3ripZcA54Sv43LzE+UEFFIIXf62+8 vE/o9/YrxUUftuIAbYzi88TcHejmxLd4iepDUi/WL2OCnfJcjP8YEGPAxABvQ+tDdB j1MNz/6FEtqRw== From: Kalle Valo To: Dmitry Antipov Cc: Doug Brown , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, lvc-project@linuxtesting.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] wifi: libertas: add missing calls to cancel_work_sync() References: <20230724084457.64995-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru> <87cz0h3d1q.fsf@kernel.org> <87r0onxdra.fsf@kernel.org> <0368ccdc-74f4-6ec1-1b7d-cfb5ebfd479d@yandex.ru> <87mszayj8x.fsf@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 17:02:08 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87mszayj8x.fsf@kernel.org> (Kalle Valo's message of "Tue, 01 Aug 2023 16:39:26 +0300") Message-ID: <87bkfqyi73.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Kalle Valo writes: > Dmitry Antipov writes: > >> On 8/1/23 13:23, Kalle Valo wrote: >> >>> Another problem I see that you don't always reply to review comments and >>> that gives an impression that the comments are ignored. Please always >>> try to reply something to the review comments, even if just a simple >>> "ok" or "I don't agree because...". >> >> Looking through my e-mails for the previous month, I was unable to find an >> unanswered review. Could you please provide an example? I'll fix it >> ASAP. > > You have sent so many patches and I don't have time to start go through > them. Maybe I noticed that with some of mwifiex patches, not sure. But > that doesn't matter, I just hope that in the future you reply to > comments. While going through patches in patchwork I noticed this dicussion: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20230726072114.51964-2-dmantipov@yandex.ru/ As there's no reply to Brian it gives a feeling that you are ignoring our comments. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches