From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:34274 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779AbdH2IWp (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2017 04:22:45 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Luca Coelho Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, David Spinadel , Luca Coelho Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: mvm: Avoid deffering non bufferable frames References: <20170825082730.31388-1-luca@coelho.fi> <20170825082730.31388-3-luca@coelho.fi> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:22:41 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170825082730.31388-3-luca@coelho.fi> (Luca Coelho's message of "Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:27:30 +0300") Message-ID: <87efruvl4e.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20170829_102251_331774_A6E740ED) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Luca Coelho writes: > From: David Spinadel > > Use bcast station for all non bufferable frames on AP and AD-HOC. > > The host is no longer aware of STAs PS status because of buffer > station offload, so we can't rely on mac80211 to toggle on > IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_PS_BUFFER bit. > > A possible issue with buffering such frames, beside the obvious spec > violation, is when a station disconnects while in PS but the AP isn't > aware of that. In such scenarios the AP won't be able to send probe > responses or auth frames so the STA won't be able to reconnect and > the AP will have a queue hang. > > Fixes: 3e56eadfb6a1 ("iwlwifi: mvm: implement AP/GO uAPSD support") > Signed-off-by: David Spinadel > Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho "deffering"? Should it be deferring? -- Kalle Valo