linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Peter Oh <poh@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com>,
	Peter Oh <poh@qca.qualcomm.com>, <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath: use PRI value given by spec for fixed PRI
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:41:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fv817ecp.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <551C5C51.8010109@codeaurora.org> (Peter Oh's message of "Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:00:01 -0700")

Peter Oh <poh@codeaurora.org> writes:

>> As for your patch at hand, I tested it for ETSI and it does not
>> change detector performance,
>
> The patch is useful when there are many missing pulses within a burst.
> It happens almost every time when channel loading rate is higher than
> 40%, but around 30% channel loading does not miss pulses that much.
>
>> therefore (please replace 16 with PRI_TOLERANCE in the macro)
>
> I'll do.
>
>> Acked-by: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com>

So what's the conclusion? Should I wait for v2 or is this good to
commit? I didn't quite get Zefir's comment about PRI_TOLERANCE above.

-- 
Kalle Valo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-15 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-27 16:59 [PATCH] ath: use PRI value given by spec for fixed PRI Peter Oh
2015-03-30  9:55 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2015-03-30 17:57   ` Peter Oh
2015-04-01 10:04     ` Zefir Kurtisi
2015-04-01 21:00       ` Peter Oh
2015-04-15 12:41         ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2015-04-15 17:10           ` Peter Oh
2015-09-03 18:04       ` Peter Oh
2015-09-04 10:55         ` Zefir Kurtisi
2015-09-04 12:55           ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fv817ecp.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=poh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=poh@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).