From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] wlegacy: Remove unneeded variable and make function to be void
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:45:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h85hh0hb.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568306492-42998-3-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> (zhong jiang's message of "Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:41:31 +0800")
zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> writes:
> il4965_set_tkip_dynamic_key_info do not need return value to
> cope with different ases. And change functon return type to void.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c
> index ffb705b..a7bbfe2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c
> @@ -3326,12 +3326,11 @@ struct il_mod_params il4965_mod_params = {
> return il_send_add_sta(il, &sta_cmd, CMD_SYNC);
> }
>
> -static int
> +static void
> il4965_set_tkip_dynamic_key_info(struct il_priv *il,
> struct ieee80211_key_conf *keyconf, u8 sta_id)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> - int ret = 0;
> __le16 key_flags = 0;
>
> key_flags |= (STA_KEY_FLG_TKIP | STA_KEY_FLG_MAP_KEY_MSK);
> @@ -3367,8 +3366,6 @@ struct il_mod_params il4965_mod_params = {
> memcpy(il->stations[sta_id].sta.key.key, keyconf->key, 16);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&il->sta_lock, flags);
> -
> - return ret;
> }
>
> void
> @@ -3483,8 +3480,7 @@ struct il_mod_params il4965_mod_params = {
> il4965_set_ccmp_dynamic_key_info(il, keyconf, sta_id);
> break;
> case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_TKIP:
> - ret =
> - il4965_set_tkip_dynamic_key_info(il, keyconf, sta_id);
> + il4965_set_tkip_dynamic_key_info(il, keyconf, sta_id);
> break;
> case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40:
> case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104:
To me this looks inconsistent with the rest of the cases in the switch
statement. And won't we then return the ret variable uninitalised?
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-12 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 16:41 [PATCH 0/3] wireless: Remove unneeded variable zhong jiang
2019-09-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] brcmsmac: Remove unneeded variable and make function to be void zhong jiang
2019-09-13 13:37 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] wlegacy: " zhong jiang
2019-09-12 17:45 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2019-09-16 5:53 ` zhong jiang
2019-09-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] libertas: " zhong jiang
2019-09-13 13:38 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h85hh0hb.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).