From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mac80211: Sync airtime weight sum with per AC synced sta airtime weight together
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 23:24:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87impqipl7.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568639388-27291-4-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org>
Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org> writes:
> Global airtime weight sum is updated only when txq is added/removed
> from rbtree. If upper layer configures sta weight during high load,
> airtime weight sum will not be updated since txq is most likely on the
> tree. It could a little late for upper layer to reconfigure sta weight
> when txq is already in the rbtree. And thus, incorrect airtime weight sum
> will lead to incorrect global virtual time calculation as well as global
> airtime weight sum overflow of airtime weight sum during txq removed.
>
> Hence, need to update airtime weight sum upon receiving event for
> configuring sta weight once sta's txq is on the rbtree.
>
> Besides, if airtime weight sum of ACs and sta weight is synced under the
> same per AC lock protection, there can be a very short window causing
> incorrct airtime weight sum calculation as below:
>
> active_txq_lock_VO .
> VO weight sum is syncd .
> sta airtime weight sum is synced .
> active_txq_unlock_VO .
> . .
> active_txq_lock_VI .
> VI weight sum is syncd .
> sta airtime weight sum active_txq_lock_BE
> active_txq_unlock_VI Remove txq and thus sum
> . is calculated with synced
> . sta airtime weight
> . active_txq_unlock_BE
>
> So introduce a per ac synced station airtime weight synced with per
> AC synced weight sum together. And the per-AC station airtime weight
> is used to calculate weight sum.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> net/mac80211/cfg.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 6 ++++--
> net/mac80211/sta_info.h | 3 +++
> net/mac80211/tx.c | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> index d65aa01..4b420bb 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> @@ -1284,7 +1284,8 @@ static int sta_apply_parameters(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> int ret = 0;
> struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
> struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = sta->sdata;
> - u32 mask, set;
> + u32 mask, set, tid, ac;
> + struct txq_info *txqi;
>
> sband = ieee80211_get_sband(sdata);
> if (!sband)
> @@ -1452,8 +1453,30 @@ static int sta_apply_parameters(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> if (ieee80211_vif_is_mesh(&sdata->vif))
> sta_apply_mesh_params(local, sta, params);
>
> - if (params->airtime_weight)
> + if (params->airtime_weight &&
> + params->airtime_weight != sta->airtime_weight) {
> + for (ac = 0; ac < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; ac++) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
> + for (tid = 0; tid < IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS + 1; tid++) {
> + if (!sta->sta.txq[tid] ||
> + ac != ieee80211_ac_from_tid(tid))
> + continue;
> +
> + sta->airtime_weight_synced[ac] =
> + params->airtime_weight;
> +
> + txqi = to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[tid]);
> + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order))
> + continue;
> +
> + local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] = local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] +
> + params->airtime_weight -
> + sta->airtime_weight;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
> + }
> sta->airtime_weight = params->airtime_weight;
With this, airtime_weight is basically only used to return to and from
userspace, right? I.e., after the above loop has run, it will match the
contents of airtime_weight_synced; so why not just turn airtime_weight
into a per-ac array? You could just use airtime_weight[0] as the value
to return to userspace...
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-16 13:09 [PATCH 1/4] mac80211: Switch to a virtual time-based airtime scheduler Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] mac80211: defer txqs removal from rbtree Yibo Zhao
2019-09-17 21:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18 10:27 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-18 11:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-19 9:56 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-19 10:37 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-20 8:29 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-20 9:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-21 10:49 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 11:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-21 11:53 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 12:22 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 13:02 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-21 13:24 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 14:00 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-22 5:19 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-23 10:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-23 11:42 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-23 16:39 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-24 5:27 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-24 7:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-24 2:45 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-24 7:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-24 8:31 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-24 8:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-16 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] mac80211: fix low throughput in push pull mode Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 15:27 ` Johannes Berg
2019-09-17 6:36 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-17 6:55 ` Johannes Berg
2019-09-17 21:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18 10:02 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-18 10:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18 10:18 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 13:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] mac80211: Sync airtime weight sum with per AC synced sta airtime weight together Yibo Zhao
2019-09-17 21:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-09-18 10:16 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] mac80211: Switch to a virtual time-based airtime scheduler Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-17 21:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-20 8:37 ` Yibo Zhao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-12-13 7:19 [PATCH V4 0/4] Enable virtual time-based airtime scheduler support on ath10k Yibo Zhao
2019-12-13 7:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] mac80211: Sync airtime weight sum with per AC synced sta airtime weight together Yibo Zhao
2019-12-13 9:58 ` Johannes Berg
2019-12-17 15:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87impqipl7.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yiboz@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).