From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Karthikeyan Periyasamy <periyasa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: reject zero MAC address in add station
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:23:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imroyiwn.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <218afd33eda4410472c2a99624f81908cf535cb4.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:
> On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 19:36 +0530, Karthikeyan Periyasamy wrote:
>> > > Don't allow using a zero MAC address as the station
>> > > MAC address. so validated the MAC address using
>> > > is_valid_ether_addr.
>> >
>> > Theoretically, all zeroes might have been a valid address at some
>> > point.
>> > I see no reason not to reject it, but I'd like to know why you ended up
>> > with this now??
>> >
>>
>> Its a Wireless fuzz testing tool (codenomicon) which sends out different
>> types of frames to the AP. It actually tampers legitimate wireless
>> frames (Probe, Auth, Assoc, Data etc..) and will send to the AP. I
>> thought allowing a zero MAC address station is not a valid. so validated
>> the given MAC address. Just for curious, which case all zero address is
>> a valid MAC.
>
> Well, it isn't really, but the OUI 00:00:00 *is* in fact assigned (or
> was), and theoretically the vendor could assign it to a device.
Heh, now that we allow routing the 0.0.0.0/8 subnet, this means that the
following could be a perfectly sensible thing to do:
'ip neigh add 0.0.0.1/8 lladdr 00:00:00:00:00:01 dev wlan0'
One bit per address per network layer ought to be enough for everyone,
right? ;)
-Toke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-26 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-24 9:16 [PATCH] mac80211: reject zero MAC address in add station Karthikeyan Periyasamy
2019-07-26 11:06 ` Johannes Berg
2019-07-26 14:06 ` Karthikeyan Periyasamy
2019-07-26 14:07 ` Johannes Berg
2019-07-26 14:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87imroyiwn.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=periyasa@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).