linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: use non-zero TID only for QoS frames
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 11:47:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87in3k6zti.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180905080036.9177-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net>

Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
>
> Some frames may have a non-zero skb->priority assigned by
> mac80211 internally, e.g. TDLS setup frames, regardless of
> support for QoS.
>
> Currently, we set skb->priority to 0 for all data frames.
> Note that there's a comment that this is "required for
> correct WPA/11i MIC", but that doesn't seem true as we use
>
>         if (ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control))
>                 qos_tid = ieee80211_get_tid(hdr);
>         else
>                 qos_tid = 0;
>
> in the code there. We could therefore reconsider this, but
> it seems like unnecessary complexity for the unlikely (and
> not very useful) case of not having QoS on the connection.
>
> This situation then causes something strange - most data
> frames will go on TXQ for TID 0 for non-QoS connections,
> but very few exceptions that are internally generated will
> go on another TXQ, possibly causing confusion.

What kind of confusion are you seeing? Reordering issues, or something
else?

-Toke

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-05 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-05  8:00 [PATCH] mac80211: use non-zero TID only for QoS frames Johannes Berg
2018-09-05  8:06 ` Arend van Spriel
2018-09-05  8:09   ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-05  9:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2018-09-05  9:50   ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-05  9:56     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-09-05 10:56       ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-05 11:07         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-09-05 11:08           ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-05 11:12             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87in3k6zti.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@toke.dk \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).