From: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] mac80211: add beacon filtering support
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:36:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k57fy964.fsf@litku.valot.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090224090137.GB10851@jm.kir.nu> (Jouni Malinen's message of "Tue\, 24 Feb 2009 11\:01\:37 +0200")
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:20:58PM -0800, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
>> We used to go through a probe request cycle once to make sure, but I'm
>> not sure there's a point in that. Just pointing out the change here.
>
> Having seen some hardware implementations of Beacon miss getting out of
> sync with the AP timing and causing way too frequent disconnections, I
> would think that there may well be good reasons to check in software
> that report was indeed correct, e.g., by sending the probe request
> before giving up on the AP.
I see your point, I also have had to suffer because of buggy APs
having unstable TBTT. But the cost for this is high, currently it
increases two seconds the time to signal a lost connection to the user
space. I would hope to have something faster.
>> The code looks pretty good, but this will lead to an interesting
>> situation where "iwlist wlan1 scan last" ("iw dev wlan1 scan dump") will
>> not show _any_ BSS, which will probably trip up NM; this happens because
>> the BSS will not be updated and expire after 10 seconds. I think we need
>> a way to "hold on" to the BSS.
>
> Dropping the BSS is not good.. The scan results should always include
> the current BSS so that information from it is available for things like
> 4-way handshake (WPA/RSN IE is needed from Beacon/ProbeResp).
Understood. Thanks for bringing this up.
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-24 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-23 16:37 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] mac80211: beacon filtering Kalle Valo
2009-02-23 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] mac80211: decrease execution of the associated timer Kalle Valo
2009-02-24 2:13 ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-24 18:40 ` Kalle Valo
2009-02-23 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] mac80211: track beacons separately from the rx path activity Kalle Valo
2009-02-24 2:15 ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-24 18:52 ` Kalle Valo
2009-02-23 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] mac80211: add beacon filtering support Kalle Valo
2009-02-23 17:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-23 19:06 ` Kalle Valo
2009-02-23 19:11 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-23 19:31 ` Kalle Valo
2009-02-23 19:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-24 4:46 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-24 5:17 ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-24 8:58 ` Jouni Malinen
2009-02-24 2:18 ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-24 20:34 ` Kalle Valo
2009-02-24 2:20 ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-24 9:01 ` Jouni Malinen
2009-02-24 18:36 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2009-02-24 18:43 ` Jouni Malinen
2009-02-24 19:02 ` Kalle Valo
2009-02-24 18:30 ` Kalle Valo
2009-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH] stlc45xx: " Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k57fy964.fsf@litku.valot.fi \
--to=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).