[PATCH v2 0/6] wifi: rtw89: preparation for MLO including AP_LINK_PS feature, ieee80211_ops and links

[PATCH v2 0/6] wifi: rtw89: preparation for MLO including AP_LINK_PS feature, ieee80211_ops and links

[Ping-Ke Shih]

Add more materials for MLO. First one is AP_LINK_PS feature. Then
implement ieee80211_ops related to links. The last two are to consider
link_id instead of -1.

v2:
  - rebase on top of tree. no other changes.

Zong-Zhe Yang (6):
  wifi: rtw89: 8922a: configure AP_LINK_PS if FW supports
  wifi: rtw89: register ops of can_activate_links
  wifi: rtw89: implement ops of change vif/sta links
  wifi: rtw89: apply MLD pairwise key to dynamically active links
  wifi: rtw89: pass target link_id to ieee80211_gtk_rekey_add()
  wifi: rtw89: pass target link_id to ieee80211_nullfunc_get()

 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c      |  32 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h      |   5 +
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c     |  45 ++-
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h     |  59 ++++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c       |  71 ++++-
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h       |  19 ++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c      |  50 ++++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.h      |   7 +
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c | 280 +++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c      |   1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/wow.c      |   5 +-
 11 files changed, 560 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 1/6] wifi: rtw89: 8922a: configure AP_LINK_PS if FW supports

[Ping-Ke Shih]

From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>

After FW v0.35.46.0, for AP mode, RTL8922A FW supports a new FW feature,
called NOTIFY_AP_INFO, to notify driver information related to AP mode.
And, one function of it is to monitor PS states of remote stations. Once
one of them changes, FW will send a C2H event to tell driver. With this
FW feature, we can declare AP_LINK_PS.

For now, driver still needs to determine if a frame is ps-poll or U-APSD
trigger. So, add the corresponding RX handling in driver, which activates
only when at least one AP is running.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c     | 42 ++++++++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h     | 37 +++++++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c       | 66 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h       | 19 ++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c      | 50 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.h      |  7 ++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c | 13 +++-
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c      |  1 +
 8 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
index 34034f44c050..c99111df90a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
@@ -2749,6 +2749,41 @@ static void rtw89_core_flush_ppdu_rx_queue(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	}
 }
 
+static
+void rtw89_core_rx_pkt_hdl(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, const struct sk_buff *skb,
+			   const struct rtw89_rx_desc_info *desc)
+{
+	struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data;
+	struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link;
+	struct ieee80211_sta *sta;
+	struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta;
+	u8 macid = desc->mac_id;
+
+	if (!refcount_read(&rtwdev->refcount_ap_info))
+		return;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
+	rtwsta_link = rtw89_assoc_link_rcu_dereference(rtwdev, macid);
+	if (!rtwsta_link)
+		goto out;
+
+	rtwsta = rtwsta_link->rtwsta;
+	if (!test_bit(RTW89_REMOTE_STA_IN_PS, rtwsta->flags))
+		goto out;
+
+	sta = rtwsta_to_sta(rtwsta);
+	if (ieee80211_is_pspoll(hdr->frame_control))
+		ieee80211_sta_pspoll(sta);
+	else if (ieee80211_has_pm(hdr->frame_control) &&
+		 (ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control) ||
+		  ieee80211_is_qos_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control)))
+		ieee80211_sta_uapsd_trigger(sta, ieee80211_get_tid(hdr));
+
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
 void rtw89_core_rx(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 		   struct rtw89_rx_desc_info *desc_info,
 		   struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -2771,6 +2806,7 @@ void rtw89_core_rx(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	rx_status = IEEE80211_SKB_RXCB(skb);
 	memset(rx_status, 0, sizeof(*rx_status));
 	rtw89_core_update_rx_status(rtwdev, desc_info, rx_status);
+	rtw89_core_rx_pkt_hdl(rtwdev, skb, desc_info);
 	if (desc_info->long_rxdesc &&
 	    BIT(desc_info->frame_type) & PPDU_FILTER_BITMAP)
 		skb_queue_tail(&ppdu_sts->rx_queue[band], skb);
@@ -3748,6 +3784,8 @@ int rtw89_core_sta_link_disassoc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 {
 	const struct ieee80211_vif *vif = rtwvif_link_to_vif(rtwvif_link);
 
+	rtw89_assoc_link_clr(rtwsta_link);
+
 	if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION)
 		rtw89_fw_h2c_set_bcn_fltr_cfg(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, false);
 
@@ -3883,6 +3921,7 @@ int rtw89_core_sta_link_assoc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 		rtw89_fw_h2c_set_bcn_fltr_cfg(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, true);
 	}
 
+	rtw89_assoc_link_set(rtwsta_link);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -5150,6 +5189,9 @@ static int rtw89_core_register_hw(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
 	if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(BEACON_FILTER, &rtwdev->fw))
 		ieee80211_hw_set(hw, CONNECTION_MONITOR);
 
+	if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(NOTIFY_AP_INFO, &rtwdev->fw))
+		ieee80211_hw_set(hw, AP_LINK_PS);
+
 	hw->wiphy->interface_modes = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) |
 				     BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) |
 				     BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_CLIENT) |
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index ecccb51184be..3e93b53fd67b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -4452,6 +4452,7 @@ enum rtw89_fw_feature {
 	RTW89_FW_FEATURE_RFK_PRE_NOTIFY_V0,
 	RTW89_FW_FEATURE_RFK_RXDCK_V0,
 	RTW89_FW_FEATURE_NO_WOW_CPU_IO_RX,
+	RTW89_FW_FEATURE_NOTIFY_AP_INFO,
 };
 
 struct rtw89_fw_suit {
@@ -5596,6 +5597,9 @@ struct rtw89_dev {
 	struct rtw89_rfe_data *rfe_data;
 	enum rtw89_custid custid;
 
+	struct rtw89_sta_link __rcu *assoc_link_on_macid[RTW89_MAX_MAC_ID_NUM];
+	refcount_t refcount_ap_info;
+
 	/* ensures exclusive access from mac80211 callbacks */
 	struct mutex mutex;
 	struct list_head rtwvifs_list;
@@ -5730,10 +5734,18 @@ static inline bool rtw89_vif_assign_link_is_valid(struct rtw89_vif_link **rtwvif
 	for (link_id = 0; link_id < IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS; link_id++) \
 		if (rtw89_vif_assign_link_is_valid(&(rtwvif_link), rtwvif, link_id))
 
+enum rtw89_sta_flags {
+	RTW89_REMOTE_STA_IN_PS,
+
+	NUM_OF_RTW89_STA_FLAGS,
+};
+
 struct rtw89_sta {
 	struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev;
 	struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif;
 
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(flags, NUM_OF_RTW89_STA_FLAGS);
+
 	bool disassoc;
 
 	struct sk_buff_head roc_queue;
@@ -5811,6 +5823,31 @@ u8 rtw89_sta_link_inst_get_index(struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link)
 	return rtwsta_link - rtwsta->links_inst;
 }
 
+static inline void rtw89_assoc_link_set(struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link)
+{
+	struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta = rtwsta_link->rtwsta;
+	struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = rtwsta->rtwdev;
+
+	rcu_assign_pointer(rtwdev->assoc_link_on_macid[rtwsta_link->mac_id],
+			   rtwsta_link);
+}
+
+static inline void rtw89_assoc_link_clr(struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link)
+{
+	struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta = rtwsta_link->rtwsta;
+	struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = rtwsta->rtwdev;
+
+	rcu_assign_pointer(rtwdev->assoc_link_on_macid[rtwsta_link->mac_id],
+			   NULL);
+	synchronize_rcu();
+}
+
+static inline struct rtw89_sta_link *
+rtw89_assoc_link_rcu_dereference(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 macid)
+{
+	return rcu_dereference(rtwdev->assoc_link_on_macid[macid]);
+}
+
 static inline int rtw89_hci_tx_write(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 				     struct rtw89_core_tx_request *tx_req)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
index 2191c037d72e..7bda9aab382c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
@@ -728,6 +728,7 @@ static const struct __fw_feat_cfg fw_feat_tbl[] = {
 	__CFG_FW_FEAT(RTL8922A, ge, 0, 35, 22, 0, WOW_REASON_V1),
 	__CFG_FW_FEAT(RTL8922A, lt, 0, 35, 31, 0, RFK_PRE_NOTIFY_V0),
 	__CFG_FW_FEAT(RTL8922A, lt, 0, 35, 42, 0, RFK_RXDCK_V0),
+	__CFG_FW_FEAT(RTL8922A, ge, 0, 35, 46, 0, NOTIFY_AP_INFO),
 };
 
 static void rtw89_fw_iterate_feature_cfg(struct rtw89_fw_info *fw,
@@ -8164,6 +8165,71 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_mrc_upd_duration(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int rtw89_fw_h2c_ap_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, bool en)
+{
+	struct rtw89_h2c_ap_info *h2c;
+	u32 len = sizeof(*h2c);
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	int ret;
+
+	skb = rtw89_fw_h2c_alloc_skb_with_hdr(rtwdev, len);
+	if (!skb) {
+		rtw89_err(rtwdev, "failed to alloc skb for ap info\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	skb_put(skb, len);
+	h2c = (struct rtw89_h2c_ap_info *)skb->data;
+
+	h2c->w0 = le32_encode_bits(en, RTW89_H2C_AP_INFO_W0_PWR_INT_EN);
+
+	rtw89_h2c_pkt_set_hdr(rtwdev, skb, FWCMD_TYPE_H2C,
+			      H2C_CAT_MAC,
+			      H2C_CL_AP,
+			      H2C_FUNC_AP_INFO, 0, 0,
+			      len);
+
+	ret = rtw89_h2c_tx(rtwdev, skb, false);
+	if (ret) {
+		rtw89_err(rtwdev, "failed to send h2c\n");
+		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int rtw89_fw_h2c_ap_info_refcount(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, bool en)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (en) {
+		if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&rtwdev->refcount_ap_info))
+			return 0;
+	} else {
+		if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&rtwdev->refcount_ap_info))
+			return 0;
+	}
+
+	ret = rtw89_fw_h2c_ap_info(rtwdev, en);
+	if (ret) {
+		if (!test_bit(RTW89_FLAG_SER_HANDLING, rtwdev->flags))
+			return ret;
+
+		/* During recovery, neither driver nor stack has full error
+		 * handling, so show a warning, but return 0 with refcount
+		 * increased normally. It can avoid underflow when calling
+		 * with @en == false later.
+		 */
+		rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "h2c ap_info failed during SER\n");
+	}
+
+	if (en)
+		refcount_set(&rtwdev->refcount_ap_info, 1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static bool __fw_txpwr_entry_zero_ext(const void *ext_ptr, u8 ext_len)
 {
 	static const u8 zeros[U8_MAX] = {};
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h
index efa63d444821..a8e9e3e0b19b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h
@@ -3466,6 +3466,12 @@ struct rtw89_h2c_wow_aoac {
 	__le32 w0;
 } __packed;
 
+struct rtw89_h2c_ap_info {
+	__le32 w0;
+} __packed;
+
+#define RTW89_H2C_AP_INFO_W0_PWR_INT_EN BIT(0)
+
 #define RTW89_C2H_HEADER_LEN 8
 
 struct rtw89_c2h_hdr {
@@ -3725,6 +3731,14 @@ struct rtw89_c2h_wow_aoac_report {
 
 #define RTW89_C2H_WOW_AOAC_RPT_REKEY_IDX BIT(0)
 
+struct rtw89_c2h_pwr_int_notify {
+	struct rtw89_c2h_hdr hdr;
+	__le32 w2;
+} __packed;
+
+#define RTW89_C2H_PWR_INT_NOTIFY_W2_MACID GENMASK(15, 0)
+#define RTW89_C2H_PWR_INT_NOTIFY_W2_PWR_STATUS BIT(16)
+
 struct rtw89_h2c_tx_duty {
 	__le32 w0;
 	__le32 w1;
@@ -4168,6 +4182,10 @@ enum rtw89_mrc_h2c_func {
 #define RTW89_MRC_WAIT_COND_REQ_TSF \
 	RTW89_MRC_WAIT_COND(0 /* don't care */, H2C_FUNC_MRC_REQ_TSF)
 
+// CLASS 36 - SoftAP
+#define H2C_CL_AP			0x24
+#define H2C_FUNC_AP_INFO 0x0
+
 #define H2C_CAT_OUTSRC			0x2
 
 #define H2C_CL_OUTSRC_RA		0x1
@@ -4697,6 +4715,7 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_mrc_sync(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 			  const struct rtw89_fw_mrc_sync_arg *arg);
 int rtw89_fw_h2c_mrc_upd_duration(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 				  const struct rtw89_fw_mrc_upd_duration_arg *arg);
+int rtw89_fw_h2c_ap_info_refcount(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, bool en);
 
 static inline void rtw89_fw_h2c_init_ba_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
index 7907b84d204b..03fc21440271 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
@@ -5364,6 +5364,39 @@ rtw89_mac_c2h_mrc_status_rpt(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *c2h, u32
 	rtw89_complete_cond(wait, cond, &data);
 }
 
+static void
+rtw89_mac_c2h_pwr_int_notify(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 len)
+{
+	const struct rtw89_c2h_pwr_int_notify *c2h;
+	struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link;
+	struct ieee80211_sta *sta;
+	struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta;
+	u16 macid;
+	bool ps;
+
+	c2h = (const struct rtw89_c2h_pwr_int_notify *)skb->data;
+	macid = le32_get_bits(c2h->w2, RTW89_C2H_PWR_INT_NOTIFY_W2_MACID);
+	ps = le32_get_bits(c2h->w2, RTW89_C2H_PWR_INT_NOTIFY_W2_PWR_STATUS);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
+	rtwsta_link = rtw89_assoc_link_rcu_dereference(rtwdev, macid);
+	if (unlikely(!rtwsta_link))
+		goto out;
+
+	rtwsta = rtwsta_link->rtwsta;
+	if (ps)
+		set_bit(RTW89_REMOTE_STA_IN_PS, rtwsta->flags);
+	else
+		clear_bit(RTW89_REMOTE_STA_IN_PS, rtwsta->flags);
+
+	sta = rtwsta_to_sta(rtwsta);
+	ieee80211_sta_ps_transition(sta, ps);
+
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
 static
 void (* const rtw89_mac_c2h_ofld_handler[])(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 					    struct sk_buff *c2h, u32 len) = {
@@ -5409,6 +5442,12 @@ void (* const rtw89_mac_c2h_wow_handler[])(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	[RTW89_MAC_C2H_FUNC_AOAC_REPORT] = rtw89_mac_c2h_wow_aoac_rpt,
 };
 
+static
+void (* const rtw89_mac_c2h_ap_handler[])(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+					  struct sk_buff *c2h, u32 len) = {
+	[RTW89_MAC_C2H_FUNC_PWR_INT_NOTIFY] = rtw89_mac_c2h_pwr_int_notify,
+};
+
 static void rtw89_mac_c2h_scanofld_rsp_atomic(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 					      struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
@@ -5463,6 +5502,13 @@ bool rtw89_mac_c2h_chk_atomic(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *c2h,
 		return true;
 	case RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_WOW:
 		return true;
+	case RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_AP:
+		switch (func) {
+		default:
+			return false;
+		case RTW89_MAC_C2H_FUNC_PWR_INT_NOTIFY:
+			return true;
+		}
 	}
 }
 
@@ -5493,6 +5539,10 @@ void rtw89_mac_c2h_handle(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		if (func < NUM_OF_RTW89_MAC_C2H_FUNC_WOW)
 			handler = rtw89_mac_c2h_wow_handler[func];
 		break;
+	case RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_AP:
+		if (func < NUM_OF_RTW89_MAC_C2H_FUNC_AP)
+			handler = rtw89_mac_c2h_ap_handler[func];
+		break;
 	case RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_FWDBG:
 		return;
 	default:
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.h
index 18579c020548..81507274a97e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.h
@@ -426,6 +426,12 @@ enum rtw89_mac_c2h_wow_func {
 	NUM_OF_RTW89_MAC_C2H_FUNC_WOW,
 };
 
+enum rtw89_mac_c2h_ap_func {
+	RTW89_MAC_C2H_FUNC_PWR_INT_NOTIFY = 0,
+
+	NUM_OF_RTW89_MAC_C2H_FUNC_AP,
+};
+
 enum rtw89_mac_c2h_class {
 	RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_INFO = 0x0,
 	RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_OFLD = 0x1,
@@ -434,6 +440,7 @@ enum rtw89_mac_c2h_class {
 	RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_MCC = 0x4,
 	RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_FWDBG = 0x5,
 	RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_MRC = 0xe,
+	RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_AP = 0x18,
 	RTW89_MAC_C2H_CLASS_MAX,
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
index 619d2d3771d5..8dc475f6fdf7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
@@ -775,6 +775,7 @@ static int rtw89_ops_start_ap(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 	struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif = vif_to_rtwvif(vif);
 	struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link;
 	const struct rtw89_chan *chan;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
 
@@ -783,6 +784,7 @@ static int rtw89_ops_start_ap(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 		rtw89_err(rtwdev,
 			  "%s: rtwvif link (link_id %u) is not active\n",
 			  __func__, link_conf->link_id);
+		ret = -ENOLINK;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -804,12 +806,18 @@ static int rtw89_ops_start_ap(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 	rtw89_fw_h2c_cam(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, NULL, NULL);
 	rtw89_chip_rfk_channel(rtwdev, rtwvif_link);
 
+	if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(NOTIFY_AP_INFO, &rtwdev->fw)) {
+		ret = rtw89_fw_h2c_ap_info_refcount(rtwdev, true);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
+	}
+
 	rtw89_queue_chanctx_work(rtwdev);
 
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static
@@ -830,6 +838,9 @@ void rtw89_ops_stop_ap(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(NOTIFY_AP_INFO, &rtwdev->fw))
+		rtw89_fw_h2c_ap_info_refcount(rtwdev, false);
+
 	rtw89_mac_stop_ap(rtwdev, rtwvif_link);
 	rtw89_chip_h2c_assoc_cmac_tbl(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, NULL);
 	rtw89_fw_h2c_join_info(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, NULL, true);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c
index 7b203bb7f151..26a944d3b672 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c
@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ static void ser_reset_mac_binding(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
 		ser_reset_vif(rtwdev, rtwvif);
 
 	rtwdev->total_sta_assoc = 0;
+	refcount_set(&rtwdev->refcount_ap_info, 0);
 }
 
 /* hal function */
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 2/6] wifi: rtw89: register ops of can_activate_links

[Ping-Ke Shih]

From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>

Register mac80211 ops of can_activate_links which is required when
we are ready to enable multiple active links.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h     |  1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index 3e93b53fd67b..dcd2ccadac96 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -830,6 +830,7 @@ enum rtw89_phy_idx {
 };
 
 #define __RTW89_MLD_MAX_LINK_NUM 2
+#define RTW89_MLD_NON_STA_LINK_NUM 1
 
 enum rtw89_chanctx_idx {
 	RTW89_CHANCTX_0 = 0,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
index 8dc475f6fdf7..40ff5aa041fa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
@@ -1484,6 +1484,30 @@ static int rtw89_ops_set_tid_config(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool rtw89_can_work_on_links(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				    struct ieee80211_vif *vif, u16 links)
+{
+	struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif = vif_to_rtwvif(vif);
+	u8 w = hweight16(links);
+
+	if (vif->type != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION &&
+	    w > RTW89_MLD_NON_STA_LINK_NUM)
+		return false;
+
+	return w <= rtwvif->links_inst_valid_num;
+}
+
+static bool rtw89_ops_can_activate_links(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
+					 struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
+					 u16 active_links)
+{
+	struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = hw->priv;
+
+	guard(mutex)(&rtwdev->mutex);
+
+	return rtw89_can_work_on_links(rtwdev, vif, active_links);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
 static int rtw89_ops_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 			     struct cfg80211_wowlan *wowlan)
@@ -1611,6 +1635,7 @@ const struct ieee80211_ops rtw89_ops = {
 	.set_sar_specs		= rtw89_ops_set_sar_specs,
 	.link_sta_rc_update	= rtw89_ops_sta_rc_update,
 	.set_tid_config		= rtw89_ops_set_tid_config,
+	.can_activate_links	= rtw89_ops_can_activate_links,
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
 	.suspend		= rtw89_ops_suspend,
 	.resume			= rtw89_ops_resume,
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 3/6] wifi: rtw89: implement ops of change vif/sta links

[Ping-Ke Shih]

From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>

To support MLO, implement change_vif_links() and change_sta_links() ops.
Basically, we follow arguments to set/clear links. One special thing is
that when vif is idle, i.e. no connection, link id 0 is set up by us for
default uses. So, when bitmap of vif links change from 0x0 to non-zero,
we clear the default one first. And when bitmap of vif links change from
non-zero to 0x0, we set up a default one at the end.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h     |  17 ++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c | 226 +++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index dcd2ccadac96..bcfefd7fa01e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -5700,10 +5700,17 @@ struct rtw89_dev {
 	u8 priv[] __aligned(sizeof(void *));
 };
 
+struct rtw89_link_conf_container {
+	struct ieee80211_bss_conf *link_conf[IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS];
+};
+
+#define RTW89_VIF_IDLE_LINK_ID 0
+
 struct rtw89_vif {
 	struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev;
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct list_head mgnt_entry;
+	struct rtw89_link_conf_container __rcu *snap_link_confs;
 
 	u8 mac_addr[ETH_ALEN];
 	__be32 ip_addr;
@@ -6273,9 +6280,19 @@ static inline struct ieee80211_bss_conf *
 __rtw89_vif_rcu_dereference_link(struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link, bool *nolink)
 {
 	struct ieee80211_vif *vif = rtwvif_link_to_vif(rtwvif_link);
+	struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif = rtwvif_link->rtwvif;
+	struct rtw89_link_conf_container *snap;
 	struct ieee80211_bss_conf *bss_conf;
 
+	snap = rcu_dereference(rtwvif->snap_link_confs);
+	if (snap) {
+		bss_conf = snap->link_conf[rtwvif_link->link_id];
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	bss_conf = rcu_dereference(vif->link_conf[rtwvif_link->link_id]);
+
+out:
 	if (unlikely(!bss_conf)) {
 		*nolink = true;
 		return &vif->bss_conf;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
index 40ff5aa041fa..a4e47ef22b9b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int rtw89_ops_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 
 	rtw89_traffic_stats_init(rtwdev, &rtwvif->stats);
 
-	rtwvif_link = rtw89_vif_set_link(rtwvif, 0);
+	rtwvif_link = rtw89_vif_set_link(rtwvif, RTW89_VIF_IDLE_LINK_ID);
 	if (!rtwvif_link) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto release_port;
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int rtw89_ops_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 	return 0;
 
 unset_link:
-	rtw89_vif_unset_link(rtwvif, 0);
+	rtw89_vif_unset_link(rtwvif, RTW89_VIF_IDLE_LINK_ID);
 release_port:
 	list_del_init(&rtwvif->list);
 	rtw89_core_release_bit_map(rtwdev->hw_port, port);
@@ -246,17 +246,17 @@ static void rtw89_ops_remove_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 
 	mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
 
-	rtwvif_link = rtwvif->links[0];
+	rtwvif_link = rtwvif->links[RTW89_VIF_IDLE_LINK_ID];
 	if (unlikely(!rtwvif_link)) {
 		rtw89_err(rtwdev,
 			  "%s: rtwvif link (link_id %u) is not active\n",
-			  __func__, 0);
+			  __func__, RTW89_VIF_IDLE_LINK_ID);
 		goto bottom;
 	}
 
 	__rtw89_ops_remove_iface_link(rtwdev, rtwvif_link);
 
-	rtw89_vif_unset_link(rtwvif, 0);
+	rtw89_vif_unset_link(rtwvif, RTW89_VIF_IDLE_LINK_ID);
 
 bottom:
 	list_del_init(&rtwvif->list);
@@ -1508,6 +1508,220 @@ static bool rtw89_ops_can_activate_links(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 	return rtw89_can_work_on_links(rtwdev, vif, active_links);
 }
 
+static void __rtw89_ops_clr_vif_links(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				      struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif,
+				      unsigned long clr_links)
+{
+	struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link;
+	unsigned int link_id;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(link_id, &clr_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
+		rtwvif_link = rtwvif->links[link_id];
+		if (unlikely(!rtwvif_link))
+			continue;
+
+		__rtw89_ops_remove_iface_link(rtwdev, rtwvif_link);
+
+		rtw89_vif_unset_link(rtwvif, link_id);
+	}
+}
+
+static int __rtw89_ops_set_vif_links(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				     struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif,
+				     unsigned long set_links)
+{
+	struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link;
+	unsigned int link_id;
+	int ret;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(link_id, &set_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
+		rtwvif_link = rtw89_vif_set_link(rtwvif, link_id);
+		if (!rtwvif_link)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = __rtw89_ops_add_iface_link(rtwdev, rtwvif_link);
+		if (ret) {
+			rtw89_err(rtwdev, "%s: failed to add iface (link id %u)\n",
+				  __func__, link_id);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static
+int rtw89_ops_change_vif_links(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
+			       struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
+			       u16 old_links, u16 new_links,
+			       struct ieee80211_bss_conf *old[IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS])
+{
+	struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = hw->priv;
+	struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif = vif_to_rtwvif(vif);
+	unsigned long clr_links = old_links & ~new_links;
+	unsigned long set_links = new_links & ~old_links;
+	bool removing_links = !old_links || clr_links;
+	struct rtw89_link_conf_container *snap;
+	int ret = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	guard(mutex)(&rtwdev->mutex);
+
+	rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_STATE,
+		    "%s: old_links (0x%08x) -> new_links (0x%08x)\n",
+		    __func__, old_links, new_links);
+
+	if (!rtw89_can_work_on_links(rtwdev, vif, new_links))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (removing_links) {
+		snap = kzalloc(sizeof(*snap), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!snap)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(snap->link_conf); i++)
+			snap->link_conf[i] = old[i];
+
+		rcu_assign_pointer(rtwvif->snap_link_confs, snap);
+	}
+
+	/* might depend on @snap; don't change order */
+	rtw89_leave_ips_by_hwflags(rtwdev);
+
+	if (rtwdev->scanning)
+		rtw89_hw_scan_abort(rtwdev, rtwdev->scan_info.scanning_vif);
+
+	if (!old_links)
+		__rtw89_ops_clr_vif_links(rtwdev, rtwvif,
+					  BIT(RTW89_VIF_IDLE_LINK_ID));
+	else if (clr_links)
+		__rtw89_ops_clr_vif_links(rtwdev, rtwvif, clr_links);
+
+	if (removing_links) {
+		/* @snap is required if and only if during removing links.
+		 * However, it's done here. So, cleanup @snap immediately.
+		 */
+		rcu_assign_pointer(rtwvif->snap_link_confs, NULL);
+
+		/* The pointers in @old will free after this function return,
+		 * so synchronously wait for all readers of snap to be done.
+		 */
+		synchronize_rcu();
+		kfree(snap);
+	}
+
+	if (set_links) {
+		ret = __rtw89_ops_set_vif_links(rtwdev, rtwvif, set_links);
+		if (ret)
+			__rtw89_ops_clr_vif_links(rtwdev, rtwvif, set_links);
+	} else if (!new_links) {
+		ret = __rtw89_ops_set_vif_links(rtwdev, rtwvif,
+						BIT(RTW89_VIF_IDLE_LINK_ID));
+		if (ret)
+			__rtw89_ops_clr_vif_links(rtwdev, rtwvif,
+						  BIT(RTW89_VIF_IDLE_LINK_ID));
+	}
+
+	rtw89_enter_ips_by_hwflags(rtwdev);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void __rtw89_ops_clr_sta_links(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				      struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta,
+				      unsigned long clr_links)
+{
+	struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link;
+	struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link;
+	unsigned int link_id;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(link_id, &clr_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
+		rtwsta_link = rtwsta->links[link_id];
+		if (unlikely(!rtwsta_link))
+			continue;
+
+		rtwvif_link = rtwsta_link->rtwvif_link;
+
+		rtw89_core_sta_link_disassoc(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link);
+		rtw89_core_sta_link_disconnect(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link);
+		rtw89_core_sta_link_remove(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link);
+
+		rtw89_sta_unset_link(rtwsta, link_id);
+	}
+}
+
+static int __rtw89_ops_set_sta_links(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				     struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta,
+				     unsigned long set_links)
+{
+	struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link;
+	struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link;
+	unsigned int link_id;
+	int ret;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(link_id, &set_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
+		rtwsta_link = rtw89_sta_set_link(rtwsta, link_id);
+		if (!rtwsta_link)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		rtwvif_link = rtwsta_link->rtwvif_link;
+
+		ret = rtw89_core_sta_link_add(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link);
+		if (ret) {
+			rtw89_err(rtwdev, "%s: failed to add sta (link id %u)\n",
+				  __func__, link_id);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		rtw89_vif_type_mapping(rtwvif_link, true);
+
+		ret = rtw89_core_sta_link_assoc(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link);
+		if (ret) {
+			rtw89_err(rtwdev, "%s: failed to assoc sta (link id %u)\n",
+				  __func__, link_id);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		__rtw89_ops_bss_link_assoc(rtwdev, rtwvif_link);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static
+int rtw89_ops_change_sta_links(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
+			       struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
+			       struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
+			       u16 old_links, u16 new_links)
+{
+	struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = hw->priv;
+	struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta = sta_to_rtwsta(sta);
+	unsigned long clr_links = old_links & ~new_links;
+	unsigned long set_links = new_links & ~old_links;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	guard(mutex)(&rtwdev->mutex);
+
+	rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_STATE,
+		    "%s: old_links (0x%08x) -> new_links (0x%08x)\n",
+		    __func__, old_links, new_links);
+
+	if (!rtw89_can_work_on_links(rtwdev, vif, new_links))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	rtw89_leave_ps_mode(rtwdev);
+
+	if (clr_links)
+		__rtw89_ops_clr_sta_links(rtwdev, rtwsta, clr_links);
+
+	if (set_links) {
+		ret = __rtw89_ops_set_sta_links(rtwdev, rtwsta, set_links);
+		if (ret)
+			__rtw89_ops_clr_sta_links(rtwdev, rtwsta, set_links);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
 static int rtw89_ops_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 			     struct cfg80211_wowlan *wowlan)
@@ -1636,6 +1850,8 @@ const struct ieee80211_ops rtw89_ops = {
 	.link_sta_rc_update	= rtw89_ops_sta_rc_update,
 	.set_tid_config		= rtw89_ops_set_tid_config,
 	.can_activate_links	= rtw89_ops_can_activate_links,
+	.change_vif_links	= rtw89_ops_change_vif_links,
+	.change_sta_links	= rtw89_ops_change_sta_links,
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
 	.suspend		= rtw89_ops_suspend,
 	.resume			= rtw89_ops_resume,
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 4/6] wifi: rtw89: apply MLD pairwise key to dynamically active links

[Ping-Ke Shih]

From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>

In MLD connection, a pairwise key should work on all active links. And, we
take just one entry in security CAM for one pairwise key. (It means we will
reuse one single entry for all links.) Originally, we already applied the
security CAM entry of pairwise key to deflink's address CAM.

However, links can be activated dynamically. So now for pairwise keys, each
rtw89_sta records the IDs of the security CAM entries. Then, when driver is
notified that some links are active via change_sta_links(), we apply target
pairwise keys to them according to the record.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c      | 32 ++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h      |  5 +++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h     |  4 +++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c | 16 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c
index 8ef59994c0db..8fa1e6c1ce13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c
@@ -135,8 +135,8 @@ static int rtw89_cam_get_avail_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 }
 
 static int rtw89_cam_get_addr_cam_key_idx(struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry *addr_cam,
-					  struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam,
-					  struct ieee80211_key_conf *key,
+					  const struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam,
+					  const struct ieee80211_key_conf *key,
 					  u8 *key_idx)
 {
 	u8 idx;
@@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ static int __rtw89_cam_detach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 static int __rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 				      struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link,
 				      struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link,
-				      struct ieee80211_key_conf *key,
-				      struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam)
+				      const struct ieee80211_key_conf *key,
+				      const struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam)
 {
 	struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry *addr_cam;
 	u8 key_idx = 0;
@@ -286,6 +286,22 @@ static int __rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int rtw89_cam_attach_link_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				  struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link,
+				  struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link,
+				  u8 sec_cam_idx)
+{
+	struct rtw89_cam_info *cam_info = &rtwdev->cam_info;
+	const struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam;
+
+	sec_cam = cam_info->sec_entries[sec_cam_idx];
+	if (!sec_cam)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	return __rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link,
+					  sec_cam->key_conf, sec_cam);
+}
+
 static int rtw89_cam_detach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 				    struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 				    struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
@@ -306,6 +322,9 @@ static int rtw89_cam_detach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 
 	rtwvif = vif_to_rtwvif(vif);
 
+	if (rtwsta)
+		clear_bit(sec_cam->sec_cam_idx, rtwsta->pairwise_sec_cam_map);
+
 	rtw89_vif_for_each_link(rtwvif, rtwvif_link, link_id) {
 		rtwsta_link = rtwsta ? rtwsta->links[link_id] : NULL;
 		if (rtwsta && !rtwsta_link)
@@ -369,6 +388,8 @@ static int rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 			return ret;
 	}
 
+	set_bit(sec_cam->sec_cam_idx, rtwsta->pairwise_sec_cam_map);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -410,6 +431,9 @@ static int rtw89_cam_sec_key_install(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	sec_cam->len = RTW89_SEC_CAM_LEN;
 	sec_cam->ext_key = ext_key;
 	memcpy(sec_cam->key, key->key, key->keylen);
+
+	sec_cam->key_conf = key;
+
 	ret = rtw89_cam_send_sec_key_cmd(rtwdev, sec_cam);
 	if (ret) {
 		rtw89_err(rtwdev, "failed to send sec key cmd: %d\n", ret);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h
index 3134ebf08825..8fd2d776408e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h
@@ -578,4 +578,9 @@ int rtw89_cam_sec_key_del(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 void rtw89_cam_bssid_changed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 			     struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link);
 void rtw89_cam_reset_keys(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev);
+int rtw89_cam_attach_link_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				  struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link,
+				  struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link,
+				  u8 sec_cam_idx);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index bcfefd7fa01e..409cbdc6b92a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -3359,6 +3359,8 @@ struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry {
 	u8 spp_mode : 1;
 	/* 256 bits */
 	u8 key[32];
+
+	struct ieee80211_key_conf *key_conf;
 };
 
 struct rtw89_sta_link {
@@ -5761,6 +5763,8 @@ struct rtw89_sta {
 	struct rtw89_ampdu_params ampdu_params[IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS];
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(ampdu_map, IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS);
 
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(pairwise_sec_cam_map, RTW89_MAX_SEC_CAM_NUM);
+
 	u8 links_inst_valid_num;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(links_inst_map, __RTW89_MLD_MAX_LINK_NUM);
 	struct rtw89_sta_link *links[IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS];
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
index a4e47ef22b9b..bf7a674bce28 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
@@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ static int __rtw89_ops_sta_add(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 		rtw89_core_txq_init(rtwdev, sta->txq[i]);
 
 	skb_queue_head_init(&rtwsta->roc_queue);
+	bitmap_zero(rtwsta->pairwise_sec_cam_map, RTW89_MAX_SEC_CAM_NUM);
 
 	rtwsta_link = rtw89_sta_set_link(rtwsta, sta->deflink.link_id);
 	if (!rtwsta_link) {
@@ -1656,6 +1657,7 @@ static int __rtw89_ops_set_sta_links(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link;
 	struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link;
 	unsigned int link_id;
+	u8 sec_cam_idx;
 	int ret;
 
 	for_each_set_bit(link_id, &set_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
@@ -1682,6 +1684,20 @@ static int __rtw89_ops_set_sta_links(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 		}
 
 		__rtw89_ops_bss_link_assoc(rtwdev, rtwvif_link);
+
+		for_each_set_bit(sec_cam_idx, rtwsta->pairwise_sec_cam_map,
+				 RTW89_MAX_SEC_CAM_NUM) {
+			ret = rtw89_cam_attach_link_sec_cam(rtwdev,
+							    rtwvif_link,
+							    rtwsta_link,
+							    sec_cam_idx);
+			if (ret) {
+				rtw89_err(rtwdev,
+					  "%s: failed to apply pairwise key (link id %u)\n",
+					  __func__, link_id);
+				return ret;
+			}
+		}
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 5/6] wifi: rtw89: pass target link_id to ieee80211_gtk_rekey_add()

[Ping-Ke Shih]

From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>

When calling ieee80211_gtk_rekey_add(), pass the target link_id
instead of always -1.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/wow.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/wow.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/wow.c
index 3e81fd974ec1..1e1dbb20d47a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/wow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/wow.c
@@ -620,7 +620,10 @@ static struct ieee80211_key_conf *rtw89_wow_gtk_rekey(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	 * need to unlock mutex
 	 */
 	mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
-	key = ieee80211_gtk_rekey_add(wow_vif, rekey_conf, -1);
+	if (ieee80211_vif_is_mld(wow_vif))
+		key = ieee80211_gtk_rekey_add(wow_vif, rekey_conf, rtwvif_link->link_id);
+	else
+		key = ieee80211_gtk_rekey_add(wow_vif, rekey_conf, -1);
 	mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
 
 	kfree(rekey_conf);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 6/6] wifi: rtw89: pass target link_id to ieee80211_nullfunc_get()

[Ping-Ke Shih]

From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>

When calling ieee80211_nullfunc_get(), pass the target link_id
instead of always -1.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 3 ++-
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c   | 5 +++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
index c99111df90a7..6f9b4f0b2748 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
@@ -3216,6 +3216,7 @@ static int rtw89_core_send_nullfunc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 				    struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link, bool qos, bool ps)
 {
 	struct ieee80211_vif *vif = rtwvif_link_to_vif(rtwvif_link);
+	int link_id = ieee80211_vif_is_mld(vif) ? rtwvif_link->link_id : -1;
 	struct ieee80211_sta *sta;
 	struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -3231,7 +3232,7 @@ static int rtw89_core_send_nullfunc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	skb = ieee80211_nullfunc_get(rtwdev->hw, vif, -1, qos);
+	skb = ieee80211_nullfunc_get(rtwdev->hw, vif, link_id, qos);
 	if (!skb) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
index 7bda9aab382c..cbd759c844e5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
@@ -2415,6 +2415,7 @@ static int rtw89_fw_h2c_add_general_pkt(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 					u8 *id)
 {
 	struct ieee80211_vif *vif = rtwvif_link_to_vif(rtwvif_link);
+	int link_id = ieee80211_vif_is_mld(vif) ? rtwvif_link->link_id : -1;
 	struct rtw89_pktofld_info *info;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	int ret;
@@ -2431,10 +2432,10 @@ static int rtw89_fw_h2c_add_general_pkt(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 		skb = ieee80211_proberesp_get(rtwdev->hw, vif);
 		break;
 	case RTW89_PKT_OFLD_TYPE_NULL_DATA:
-		skb = ieee80211_nullfunc_get(rtwdev->hw, vif, -1, false);
+		skb = ieee80211_nullfunc_get(rtwdev->hw, vif, link_id, false);
 		break;
 	case RTW89_PKT_OFLD_TYPE_QOS_NULL:
-		skb = ieee80211_nullfunc_get(rtwdev->hw, vif, -1, true);
+		skb = ieee80211_nullfunc_get(rtwdev->hw, vif, link_id, true);
 		break;
 	case RTW89_PKT_OFLD_TYPE_EAPOL_KEY:
 		skb = rtw89_eapol_get(rtwdev, rtwvif_link);
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] wifi: rtw89: 8922a: configure AP_LINK_PS if FW supports

[Kalle Valo]

Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes:

> From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
>
> After FW v0.35.46.0, for AP mode, RTL8922A FW supports a new FW feature,
> called NOTIFY_AP_INFO, to notify driver information related to AP mode.
> And, one function of it is to monitor PS states of remote stations. Once
> one of them changes, FW will send a C2H event to tell driver. With this
> FW feature, we can declare AP_LINK_PS.
>
> For now, driver still needs to determine if a frame is ps-poll or U-APSD
> trigger. So, add the corresponding RX handling in driver, which activates
> only when at least one AP is running.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

[...]

> +static inline void rtw89_assoc_link_clr(struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link)
> +{
> +	struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta = rtwsta_link->rtwsta;
> +	struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = rtwsta->rtwdev;
> +
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(rtwdev->assoc_link_on_macid[rtwsta_link->mac_id],
> +			   NULL);
> +	synchronize_rcu();
> +}

In ath12k patches I got feedback that synchronize_rcu() should not be
used unless we explicitly need it, for example if if we free something
or similar. Just wanted to mention this, up to you if you want to keep
it or not.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] wifi: rtw89: 8922a: configure AP_LINK_PS if FW supports

[Kalle Valo]

Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes:

> From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
>
> After FW v0.35.46.0, for AP mode, RTL8922A FW supports a new FW feature,
> called NOTIFY_AP_INFO, to notify driver information related to AP mode.
> And, one function of it is to monitor PS states of remote stations. Once
> one of them changes, FW will send a C2H event to tell driver. With this
> FW feature, we can declare AP_LINK_PS.
>
> For now, driver still needs to determine if a frame is ps-poll or U-APSD
> trigger. So, add the corresponding RX handling in driver, which activates
> only when at least one AP is running.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

[...]

> +// CLASS 36 - SoftAP

In wireless we prefer '/* */'.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

RE: [PATCH v2 1/6] wifi: rtw89: 8922a: configure AP_LINK_PS if FW supports

[Ping-Ke Shih]

Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote:
> Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes:
> 
> > From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
> >
> > After FW v0.35.46.0, for AP mode, RTL8922A FW supports a new FW feature,
> > called NOTIFY_AP_INFO, to notify driver information related to AP mode.
> > And, one function of it is to monitor PS states of remote stations. Once
> > one of them changes, FW will send a C2H event to tell driver. With this
> > FW feature, we can declare AP_LINK_PS.
> >
> > For now, driver still needs to determine if a frame is ps-poll or U-APSD
> > trigger. So, add the corresponding RX handling in driver, which activates
> > only when at least one AP is running.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static inline void rtw89_assoc_link_clr(struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link)
> > +{
> > +     struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta = rtwsta_link->rtwsta;
> > +     struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = rtwsta->rtwdev;
> > +
> > +     rcu_assign_pointer(rtwdev->assoc_link_on_macid[rtwsta_link->mac_id],
> > +                        NULL);
> > +     synchronize_rcu();
> > +}
> 
> In ath12k patches I got feedback that synchronize_rcu() should not be
> used unless we explicitly need it, for example if if we free something
> or similar. Just wanted to mention this, up to you if you want to keep
> it or not.

The 'rtwdev->assoc_link_on_macid[rtwsta_link->mac_id]' is to store pointer of
rtwsta that is drv_priv [] of ieee80211_sta. After returning from this
function (disassoc), ieee80211_sta is going to be freed by kfree, no other
synchronize_rcu(), so I think this is necessary here. 

Thanks for your reminder. 

RE: [PATCH v2 1/6] wifi: rtw89: 8922a: configure AP_LINK_PS if FW supports

[Ping-Ke Shih]

Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote:
> Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes:
> 
> > From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
> >
> > After FW v0.35.46.0, for AP mode, RTL8922A FW supports a new FW feature,
> > called NOTIFY_AP_INFO, to notify driver information related to AP mode.
> > And, one function of it is to monitor PS states of remote stations. Once
> > one of them changes, FW will send a C2H event to tell driver. With this
> > FW feature, we can declare AP_LINK_PS.
> >
> > For now, driver still needs to determine if a frame is ps-poll or U-APSD
> > trigger. So, add the corresponding RX handling in driver, which activates
> > only when at least one AP is running.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +// CLASS 36 - SoftAP
> 
> In wireless we prefer '/* */'.
> 

The checkpatch is changed to allow this style by default, so I didn't catch
the warning. Add option "--ignore C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE" to my local script.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] wifi: rtw89: 8922a: configure AP_LINK_PS if FW supports

[Kalle Valo]

Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes:

> Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes:
>> 
>> > From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
>> >
>> > After FW v0.35.46.0, for AP mode, RTL8922A FW supports a new FW feature,
>> > called NOTIFY_AP_INFO, to notify driver information related to AP mode.
>> > And, one function of it is to monitor PS states of remote stations. Once
>> > one of them changes, FW will send a C2H event to tell driver. With this
>> > FW feature, we can declare AP_LINK_PS.
>> >
>> > For now, driver still needs to determine if a frame is ps-poll or U-APSD
>> > trigger. So, add the corresponding RX handling in driver, which activates
>> > only when at least one AP is running.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> > +// CLASS 36 - SoftAP
>> 
>> In wireless we prefer '/* */'.
>> 
>
> The checkpatch is changed to allow this style by default, so I didn't catch
> the warning. Add option "--ignore C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE" to my local script.

Oh, didn't know that. We should then add that to our ath12k-check script
as well.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches