Re: [PATCH 1/4] wifi: libertas: add missing calls to cancel_work_sync()

[Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>]

Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru> writes:

> On 8/1/23 13:23, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> Another problem I see that you don't always reply to review comments and
>> that gives an impression that the comments are ignored. Please always
>> try to reply something to the review comments, even if just a simple
>> "ok" or "I don't agree because...".
>
> Looking through my e-mails for the previous month, I was unable to find an
> unanswered review. Could you please provide an example? I'll fix it
> ASAP.

You have sent so many patches and I don't have time to start go through
them. Maybe I noticed that with some of mwifiex patches, not sure. But
that doesn't matter, I just hope that in the future you reply to
comments.

> I don't want to speculate around the workflow of others and realize
> that someone (especially the maintainer) may be overloaded and too
> busy. OTOH it's not quite clear why the trivial things like
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=169030215701718&w=2 stalls for
> almost a week. Should I consider this as "ignored" too?

A delay of week is business as usual, I have patches in queue which are
from last October:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=684424&state=*

Remember that this is not a 24/7 service and we just had a summer break.
I have 160 patches in patchwork right so expect long delays but you can
check the status from patchwork yourself:

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#checking_state_of_patches_from_patchwork

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches