linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] ath10k: adjust skb length in ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_packet
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:46:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87muf9k4pq.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567679893-14029-2-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org> (Wen Gong's message of "Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:38:06 +0800")

Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:

> From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
>
> When the FW bundles multiple packets, pkt->act_len may be incorrect
> as it refers to the first packet only (however, the FW will only
> bundle packets that fit into the same pkt->alloc_len).
>
> Before this patch, the skb length would be set (incorrectly) to
> pkt->act_len in ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_packet, and then later manually
> adjusted in ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_process_packet.
>
> The first problem is that ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_process_packet does not
> use proper skb_put commands to adjust the length (it directly changes
> skb->len), so we end up with a mismatch between skb->head + skb->tail
> and skb->data + skb->len. This is quite serious, and causes corruptions
> in the TCP stack, as the stack tries to coalesce packets, and relies
> on skb->tail being correct (that is, skb_tail_pointer must point to
> the first byte_after_ the data).
>
> Instead of re-adjusting the size in ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_process_packet,
> this moves the code to ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_packet, and also add a
> bounds check, as skb_put would crash the kernel if not enough space is
> available.
>
> Tested with QCA6174 SDIO with firmware
> WLAN.RMH.4.4.1-00007-QCARMSWP-1.
>
> Fixes: 8530b4e7b22bc3b ("ath10k: sdio: set skb len for all rx packets")
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>

[...]

> @@ -632,13 +627,29 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_packet(struct ath10k *ar,
>  {
>  	struct ath10k_sdio *ar_sdio = ath10k_sdio_priv(ar);
>  	struct sk_buff *skb = pkt->skb;
> +	struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = ath10k_sdio_readsb(ar, ar_sdio->mbox_info.htc_addr,
>  				 skb->data, pkt->alloc_len);
> +
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		/* Update actual length. The original length may be incorrect,
> +		 * as the FW will bundle multiple packets as long as their sizes
> +		 * fit within the same aligned length (pkt->alloc_len).
> +		 */
> +		htc_hdr = (struct ath10k_htc_hdr *)skb->data;
> +		pkt->act_len = le16_to_cpu(htc_hdr->len) + sizeof(*htc_hdr);
> +		if (pkt->act_len <= pkt->alloc_len) {
> +			skb_put(skb, pkt->act_len);
> +		} else {
> +			ath10k_warn(ar, "rx packet too large (%zu > %zu)\n",
> +				    pkt->act_len, pkt->alloc_len);
> +			ret = -EMSGSIZE;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	pkt->status = ret;
> -	if (!ret)
> -		skb_put(skb, pkt->act_len);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }

I simplified the error handling in this function to follow the ath10k
style, please check carefully that I didn't create any bugs:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=6e4d2cc5

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-12 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-05 10:38 [PATCH v5 0/8] ath10k: improve throughout of tcp/udp TX/RX of sdio Wen Gong
2019-09-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] ath10k: adjust skb length in ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_packet Wen Gong
2019-09-12 13:46   ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2019-09-12 14:02     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-09-12 14:54   ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] ath10k: enable RX bundle receive for sdio Wen Gong
2019-09-21 12:15   ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] ath10k: change max RX bundle size from 8 to 32 " Wen Gong
2019-09-23  9:05   ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-24  9:32     ` Wen Gong
2019-09-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio Wen Gong
2019-09-23  9:49   ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] ath10k: disable TX complete indication of htt for sdio Wen Gong
2019-09-21 12:02   ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] ath10k: add htt TX bundle " Wen Gong
2019-09-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] ath10k: enable alt data of TX path " Wen Gong
2019-09-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] ath10k: enable napi on RX " Wen Gong
2019-09-23  9:22   ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-12 15:39 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] ath10k: improve throughout of tcp/udp TX/RX of sdio Kalle Valo
2019-09-12 17:51   ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-13  3:54     ` Wen Gong
2019-09-20 12:44       ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-23  9:29 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-24 12:32   ` Wen Gong
2019-09-26  2:33     ` Wen Gong
2019-10-14 11:53       ` Wen Gong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87muf9k4pq.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wgong@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).