From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42858 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751443AbbJFOQW (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:16:22 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Martin Blumenstingl Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com, nbd@openwrt.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ath9k: Fix NF CCA limits for AR9287 and AR9227 References: <1437554563-11712-1-git-send-email-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 17:16:14 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1437554563-11712-1-git-send-email-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> (Martin Blumenstingl's message of "Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:42:43 +0200") Message-ID: <87mvvw13rl.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20151006_161625_466712_6185B767) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Martin Blumenstingl writes: > The FreeBSD driver [0] uses the same 2G values as for the AR9280 chips. > Using the same values in ath9k results in much better throughput for me. > > Before this patch I had a huge amount of packet loss (sometimes up to > 40%) and the max transfer speed was somewhere around 5Mbit/s. With this > patch applied I have zero packet loss and ten times the throughput. > My device uses a AR9227 which is the PCI variant of the AR9287. > > [0] http://bxr.su/FreeBSD/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal/ar9002/ar9287.h > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl So what should I do with this patch? Is this good to apply? Discussion here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6841051/ -- Kalle Valo