From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54CE213C9A1; Thu, 9 May 2024 09:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715248104; cv=none; b=DQjkyhRMT86yR//hEWDH0UZ+Q/jz8qiHMJbm8zNs/ZKYRGhRUXjKUY2bm1Tny11pHsBTaWpwjKfTJGmGGmLGfm3RZ6TI3KZE5tDt2WCjHTKiWGVxqIwLl5kyIgvIEWYCUrSxNf685C5Ye+CreQuxhSnBr+hwd/IkmujrVi3GOJ8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715248104; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x91PPA8I915qWgtXq6YkB2ihGWBsWfIw40RlhsjrtDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZbtO9GxuRoaeM/q1CghGFJeDbjIFb5UkXP+0t4qb0K8O01iD23cS0pToWSPa1zkbTwEVzOp/v9y48Tz1gneVC81mVKdQNN0M+wmOCfuYdHKKdlmIMOE5GT1+cG3wEqmwXUmagjqWkVxNOyE1cwJD4wsZPUquUibUn3iTJbaIgH0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XE1hmBUr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XE1hmBUr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA397C116B1; Thu, 9 May 2024 09:48:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715248103; bh=x91PPA8I915qWgtXq6YkB2ihGWBsWfIw40RlhsjrtDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XE1hmBUrqwarnydIAoimo6HRIjq7uEbjauEQ7vY7pRNpZkOC4Tj5Wvz4BsYgShYCJ 7rIm4h6vZkQdo0+vLz24QpN+evBddfEEfgG5930kjQ9rua6sy+XAyqW8teex5koYkw BkaLvAPqOxGjhohCeeMws+NiPY03G3k8wAKAzdMKhw7ZZXCxG2SmNw3iDp5I3k7xuT sGAB8oZLB8klzD+K0E++/I98JH+YqE2bAg+/Z2pW2xODgyb8HvQzl+PRj5NU+LZCxN fCJLvGa1q5Mh5Qoa7tUmhAqzBPO95Wzg9HGYp7FSnICgtxZoJLF1HMYIfbaD9zySWS xi2eLzeBajS0g== From: Kalle Valo To: Ping-Ke Shih Cc: Breno Leitao , "leit@meta.com" , "open list:REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER (rtw89)" , "open list" Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless] wifi: rtw89: Un-embed dummy device References: <20240424182351.3936556-1-leitao@debian.org> <87ttjqgf2r.fsf@kernel.org> <87mspigex0.fsf@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 12:48:21 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Ping-Ke Shih's message of "Thu, 9 May 2024 07:59:01 +0000") Message-ID: <87o79fl3iy.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Ping-Ke Shih writes: >> Out of curiosity, why don't you rebase your tree to net-next/linux-next >> frequently? > > My tree goes to wireless-next, so I think it should be always based on > wireless-next. Once wirelss-next rebase (ff-merge) net-next, my tree will > have them also. The simple answer about updating to net-next frequently: it's complicated :) The long answer is that the guidance from Linus is to avoid making unnecessary merges so we fast forward wireless-next only after it's pulled to net-next. And we can't rebase wireless-next due to downstream trees Ping's rtw tree, besides rebasing public git trees is evil anyway. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches