From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Tony Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"jano.vesely\@gmail.com" <jano.vesely@gmail.com>,
"linux\@endlessm.com" <linux@endlessm.com>,
"briannorris\@chromium.org" <briannorris@chromium.org>,
"gojun077\@gmail.com" <gojun077@gmail.com>,
"drake\@endlessm.com" <drake@endlessm.com>,
"davem\@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"jian-hong\@endlessm.com" <jian-hong@endlessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rebased 0/2] rtw88: pci: interrupt routine improvement
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:17:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o901po9h.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7CD281DE3E379468C6D07993EA72F84D18C5FE8@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw> (Tony Chuang's message of "Tue, 3 Sep 2019 11:55:56 +0000")
Tony Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com> writes:
>> From: Kalle Valo [mailto:kvalo@codeaurora.org]
>>
>> <yhchuang@realtek.com> writes:
>>
>> > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
>> >
>> > This patch set includes two patches to improve PCI interrupt routine.
>> > One is to reduce HW IRQ time, the other is to enable MSI.
>> >
>> > The patches can be found at:
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11114043/
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11126007/
>> >
>> > They were rebased properly to resolve conflicts.
>>
>> In the future, please use version markings ("v2", "v3" etc) in the
>> Subject and not something like "rebased". This makes my life easier as I
>> can immeaditely see what is the latest version I should take.
>>
>
> Oh, I just combine two patches with different version markings.
> And I don't know how to write a proper subject in this case, maybe
> I shouldn't use cover latter?
The cover letter was helpful, please continue using that. IIRC the
separate patches were v3 and v4, so using v5 would have been clear for
me. But no need to resend because of this, just trying to streamline the
process and optimise my time :)
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-03 9:14 [PATCH rebased 0/2] rtw88: pci: interrupt routine improvement yhchuang
2019-09-03 9:14 ` [PATCH rebased 1/2] rtw88: pci: Move a mass of jobs in hw IRQ to soft IRQ yhchuang
2019-09-03 13:37 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-03 9:14 ` [PATCH rebased 2/2] rtw88: pci: enable MSI interrupt yhchuang
2019-09-03 11:10 ` [PATCH rebased 0/2] rtw88: pci: interrupt routine improvement Kalle Valo
2019-09-03 11:55 ` Tony Chuang
2019-09-03 12:17 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2019-09-03 12:21 ` Tony Chuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o901po9h.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drake@endlessm.com \
--cc=gojun077@gmail.com \
--cc=jano.vesely@gmail.com \
--cc=jian-hong@endlessm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@endlessm.com \
--cc=yhchuang@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).