From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.38]:32085 "EHLO sabertooth02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751168AbbALLwB (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:52:01 -0500 From: Kalle Valo To: Sujith Manoharan CC: Michal Kazior , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix DMA burst size References: <1419834066-11802-1-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org> <21677.2491.857663.473071@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:51:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <21677.2491.857663.473071@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Sujith Manoharan's message of "Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:56:03 +0530") Message-ID: <87ppakdxnv.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20150112_125222_789252_2E635CD7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sujith Manoharan writes: > Michal Kazior wrote: >> Since it's for cards/chips why do you enable it for 10.2 only? There's >> 10.1, main and tlv as well which could possibly benefit from this. > > I've not tested it with any of the FW versions other than 10.2 and > am not sure if older FW support this properly. We could try it > with 10.1, I guess - but even that is in 'maintenance mode' > internally. Yeah, I don't see much point of trying to improve our 10.1 support as all the new development happens on 10.2 branch. Most important is that we don't break 10.1 support ("no regressions" rule), but it in no way does 10.1 need to be in feature parity with 10.2. -- Kalle Valo