From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thomas.huehn@hs-nordhausen.de, nbd@nbd.name, kvalo@kernel.org,
johannes.berg@intel.com, lorenzo@kernel.org,
Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath9k: fix per-packet TX-power cap for TPC
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:11:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0t6mfzo.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230330132159.758088-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> writes:
> Fix incorrect usage of plain rate_idx as index into the max (power) per
> rate lookup table.
>
> For transmit power control (TPC), the ath9k driver maintains internal
> tables (in struct ath_hw) to store the max allowed power level per rate.
> They are used to limit a given TX-power according to regulatory and user
> limits in the TX-path per packet. The tables are filled in a predefined
> order, starting with values for CCK + OFDM rates and followed by the
> values for MCS rates. Thus, the maximum power levels for MCS do not
> start at index 0 in the table but are shifted by a fixed value.
>
> The TX-power limiting in ath_get_rate_txpower currently does not apply
> this shift, thus retrieves the incorrect maximum power level for a given
> rate. In particular for MCS rates, the maximum power levels for CCK/OFDM
> rates were used, e.g. maximum power for OFDM 0 was used for MCS 0. If
> STBC is used, the power is mostly limited to 0 because the STBC table
> is zeroed for legacy CCK/OFDM rates. Encountered this during testing of
> our work-in-progress TPC per packet for ath9k.
> This only has an effect when TPC is enabled in ath9k (tpc_enabled in
> struct ath_hw) which defaults to false. In this case it has a
> significant impact on the used TX-power, throughput + RSSI. Otherwise
> the affected code is just skipped and TX-power is limited with the
> hardware registers only. This patch fixes this table lookup.
>
> Tested on OpenWrt (kernel 5.15.98, but backported ath9k driver) with
> small desk setup using ath9k chips AR9280 and AR9580. Cap of TX-power is
> working properly for all rates now, throughput and RSSI as expected,
> equal to as if TPC was disabled.
> Compile-tested with latest 6.3 kernel + allyesconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 13:21 [PATCH v2] ath9k: fix per-packet TX-power cap for TPC Jonas Jelonek
2023-03-30 15:11 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2023-04-17 10:31 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r0t6mfzo.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=jelonek.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=thomas.huehn@hs-nordhausen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).