From: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] wl1251 sdio interface
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:04:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r5wfp1v4.fsf@litku.valot.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090717184643.25883.95065.stgit@tikku> (Kalle Valo's message of "Fri\, 17 Jul 2009 21\:47\:39 +0300")
Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi> writes:
> Here is v2 of Bob's wl1251 sdio patches. I have now rebased them on
> top of wl1251/wl1271 split patches. Only compile-tested because I
> don't have working test setup right now (neither spi or sdio), but I
> should have access to one in two weeks.
I forgot to mention that wl1251 most probably is still broken regards to
bssid handling. I will fix this after my (current) vacation, unless
someone else is faster. To get wl1251 temporarily working, this patch
must be reverted:
commit cc3ec8cb518534c1c593e5f2682710d33c903627
Author: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu May 14 13:10:14 2009 +0200
mac80211: fix managed mode BSSID handling
Currently, we will ask the driver to configure right away
when somebody changes the desired BSSID. That's totally
strange because then we will configure the driver without
even knowing whether the BSS exists. Change this to only
configure the BSSID when associated, and configure a zero
BSSID when not associated.
Oddly enough I can't find this patch anymore in wireless-testing, I
could only find a revert. I don't know what happened to it.
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-17 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 18:47 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] wl1251 sdio interface Kalle Valo
2009-07-17 18:47 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] wl1251: remove fixed address support from spi commands Kalle Valo
2009-07-17 18:47 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] wl1251: separate bus i/o code into io.c Kalle Valo
2009-07-17 18:48 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] wl1251: use wiphy_dev instead of wl->spi->dev Kalle Valo
2009-07-17 18:48 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] wl1251: introduce wl1251_if_operations struct Kalle Valo
2009-07-17 18:48 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] wl1251: make wl1251_set_partition bus agnostic Kalle Valo
2009-07-17 18:48 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] wl1251: move module probe methods into spi.c Kalle Valo
2009-07-17 18:48 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] wl1251: split spi interface into separate module Kalle Valo
2009-07-17 18:48 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] wl1251: add sdio support Kalle Valo
2009-07-17 19:04 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2009-07-17 19:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] wl1251 sdio interface Bob Copeland
2009-07-18 5:32 ` Bob Copeland
2009-07-19 13:03 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r5wfp1v4.fsf@litku.valot.fi \
--to=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).