From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FB46535A3 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710777112; cv=none; b=qjSgo3yZqXtDYOvlxXBA6tTix5zFldNAwrlQ35010BiNyD+zYmd85vGKqR6jb/UyTCrad0VLjgpV7fnmB3nXu08uQHmOu2SxQUci/EqPsxmsgwMks5bIQ5iHH6WAjhQ9v69aooXlD9YDDnZKMc00p9q5V1ft2solvDBq+9oQnkI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710777112; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PHnH0COEHNBZDq8Wm4oxYFn87tNlx1Q+VbmW6kLBc80=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=N9xKLtUtRtjjvkj7KWinREmPZwFKnXiXbtenOC9beYk6cb3d64cJcXCnqiHTnf+p4B/xpbC4vqsegEnQsVF8KrPIRqIjiu0B9vuckYqarcGiaBNZB8fFOl1UV+hQeKe9OztY+fASc/jAE8+zPyUSh7cOyIPe+q6N9cahoDD/5as= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EayC+uec; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EayC+uec" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC480C43390; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:51:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1710777111; bh=PHnH0COEHNBZDq8Wm4oxYFn87tNlx1Q+VbmW6kLBc80=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EayC+uecMtkOf0ReVhmrWiOONMG47Y1bclCnITcIIeG+VdC5eFMfDOThKVOR04sNO hT/n+cB0gwB7GvO2YQjMAhhgzjl/Q7LiHZEXnsWrNgqEEJ+8HvbycV3+2/t4EbCFrH Ca1sCtoQb4cWM0XLqWvkZNbjNsnUNc490jipkYsa/VQVb9zqO3v/gGLLZpR1f3/CJy NHM0EudCDxmIyrox4rVDcJ0Y3rrvBvS//lY7yGlPdzS0NgEw96UxNSi5wl2Y+kX6Ug /wvVpnNZ6RAGTuwb9oeoy/RhusMnXz/8apg0jXtKEUEZzDcEMLLcf7PJeT8QQ/xHh+ Sx4aSqF8BQRGg== From: Kalle Valo To: Aloka Dixit Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz References: <20240314204651.11075-1-quic_alokad@quicinc.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:51:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20240314204651.11075-1-quic_alokad@quicinc.com> (Aloka Dixit's message of "Thu, 14 Mar 2024 13:46:51 -0700") Message-ID: <87sf0nczca.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Aloka Dixit writes: > WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace > peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data. > > Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 > > Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz") > Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit What does this fix from user's point of view? Does it mean that 320 MHz chanels were broken before and this commit fixes that? I can ammend the commit message. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches