linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 04/11] ath10k: add start_once support
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:25:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shc2aip8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170917194013.8658-5-erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> (Erik Stromdahl's message of "Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:40:06 +0200")

Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> writes:

> Add possibility to configure the driver to only start target once.
> This can reduce startup time of SDIO devices significantly since
> loading the firmware can take a substantial amount of time.

But it also makes it impossible to restart the firmware if it crashes,
right? Good to mention that in the commit log.

> The patch is also necessary for high latency devices in general since
> it does not seem to be possible to rerun the BMI phase (fw upload)
> without power-cycling the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>

[...]

> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> @@ -784,6 +784,8 @@ struct ath10k {
> =20
>  	bool is_high_latency;
> =20
> +	bool is_started;

Is a separate boolean really needed? State management becomes really
difficult if an enum ath10k_state and this boolean to define the state
of the device. Can't you use ar->state?

> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
> @@ -569,6 +569,12 @@ struct ath10k_hw_params {
>  	bool is_high_latency;
> =20
>  	enum ath10k_bus bus;
> +
> +	/* Specifies whether or not the device should be started once.
> +	 * If set, the device will be started once by the early fw probe
> +	 * and it will not be terminated afterwards.
> +	 */
> +	bool start_once;
>  };

I would actually prefer that the bus driver (eg. usb.c) decides this and
provides it though ath10k_core_register(). It might be that some SDIO
devices have a GPIO line to reset the device etc.

The struct ath10k_bus_params I mentioned earlier might be handy also
here.

--=20
Kalle Valo=

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-22 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-17 19:40 [RFC v3 00/11] ath10k high latency Erik Stromdahl
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 01/11] ath10k: high_latency detection Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:06   ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 02/11] ath10k: htt: RX ring config HL support Erik Stromdahl
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 03/11] ath10k: per target configurablity of various items Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:19   ` Kalle Valo
2017-12-28 12:43     ` Erik Stromdahl
2018-01-08 13:41       ` Kalle Valo
2018-01-08 14:03         ` Govind Singh
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 04/11] ath10k: add start_once support Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:25   ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 05/11] ath10k: htt: High latency TX support Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:26   ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 06/11] ath10k: htt: High latency RX support Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:32   ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 07/11] ath10k: various fixes for high latency devices Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:43   ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 08/11] ath10k: add QCA9377 usb hw_param item Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:46   ` Kalle Valo
2017-12-22 15:49   ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 09/11] ath10k: add QCA9377 sdio " Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 10/11] ath10k: wmi: disable softirq's while calling ieee80211_rx Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 11/11] ath10k: remove htt pending TX count for high latency Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:55 ` [RFC v3 00/11] ath10k " Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87shc2aip8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=erik.stromdahl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).