From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 04/11] ath10k: add start_once support
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:25:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shc2aip8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170917194013.8658-5-erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> (Erik Stromdahl's message of "Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:40:06 +0200")
Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> writes:
> Add possibility to configure the driver to only start target once.
> This can reduce startup time of SDIO devices significantly since
> loading the firmware can take a substantial amount of time.
But it also makes it impossible to restart the firmware if it crashes,
right? Good to mention that in the commit log.
> The patch is also necessary for high latency devices in general since
> it does not seem to be possible to rerun the BMI phase (fw upload)
> without power-cycling the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
[...]
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> @@ -784,6 +784,8 @@ struct ath10k {
> =20
> bool is_high_latency;
> =20
> + bool is_started;
Is a separate boolean really needed? State management becomes really
difficult if an enum ath10k_state and this boolean to define the state
of the device. Can't you use ar->state?
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
> @@ -569,6 +569,12 @@ struct ath10k_hw_params {
> bool is_high_latency;
> =20
> enum ath10k_bus bus;
> +
> + /* Specifies whether or not the device should be started once.
> + * If set, the device will be started once by the early fw probe
> + * and it will not be terminated afterwards.
> + */
> + bool start_once;
> };
I would actually prefer that the bus driver (eg. usb.c) decides this and
provides it though ath10k_core_register(). It might be that some SDIO
devices have a GPIO line to reset the device etc.
The struct ath10k_bus_params I mentioned earlier might be handy also
here.
--=20
Kalle Valo=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-22 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-17 19:40 [RFC v3 00/11] ath10k high latency Erik Stromdahl
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 01/11] ath10k: high_latency detection Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:06 ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 02/11] ath10k: htt: RX ring config HL support Erik Stromdahl
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 03/11] ath10k: per target configurablity of various items Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:19 ` Kalle Valo
2017-12-28 12:43 ` Erik Stromdahl
2018-01-08 13:41 ` Kalle Valo
2018-01-08 14:03 ` Govind Singh
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 04/11] ath10k: add start_once support Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:25 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 05/11] ath10k: htt: High latency TX support Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:26 ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 06/11] ath10k: htt: High latency RX support Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:32 ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 07/11] ath10k: various fixes for high latency devices Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:43 ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 08/11] ath10k: add QCA9377 usb hw_param item Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:46 ` Kalle Valo
2017-12-22 15:49 ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 09/11] ath10k: add QCA9377 sdio " Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 10/11] ath10k: wmi: disable softirq's while calling ieee80211_rx Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Kalle Valo
2017-09-17 19:40 ` [RFC v3 11/11] ath10k: remove htt pending TX count for high latency Erik Stromdahl
2017-12-22 15:55 ` [RFC v3 00/11] ath10k " Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87shc2aip8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=erik.stromdahl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).