From: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: "Manoharan, Rajkumar" <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"rmanohar@codeaurora.org" <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath10k: fix unconditional num_mpdus_ready subtraction
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:48:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shz0b4s2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459352551-11773-3-git-send-email-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> (Rajkumar Manoharan's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:12:31 +0530")
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> writes:
> Decrement num_mpdus_ready only when rx amsdu is processed successfully.
> Not doing so, will result in leak and impact stabilty under low memory
> cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
> index 96a7417..9696c2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
> @@ -2412,14 +2412,12 @@ static void ath10k_htt_txrx_compl_task(unsigned long ptr)
> struct ath10k_htt *htt = (struct ath10k_htt *)ptr;
> struct ath10k *ar = htt->ar;
> struct htt_tx_done tx_done = {};
> - struct sk_buff_head rx_q;
> struct sk_buff_head rx_ind_q;
> struct sk_buff_head tx_ind_q;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> unsigned long flags;
> int num_mpdus;
>
> - __skb_queue_head_init(&rx_q);
> __skb_queue_head_init(&rx_ind_q);
> __skb_queue_head_init(&tx_ind_q);
I guess you are removing the unused rx_q just as a cleanup? It's good
practise to mention that in the commit log (or better yet in a separate
patch).
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-05 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 15:42 [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: fix calibration init sequence of qca99x0 Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-30 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath10k: remove unnecessary warning for probe response drops Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-31 16:57 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-01 5:13 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-30 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] ath10k: fix unconditional num_mpdus_ready subtraction Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-31 18:52 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-01 5:19 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-04-05 12:46 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-04-05 12:48 ` Valo, Kalle [this message]
2016-04-05 13:34 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-04-05 12:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: fix calibration init sequence of qca99x0 Valo, Kalle
2016-04-05 13:32 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87shz0b4s2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmanohar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).